1
   

"I disagree" vs "That's intellectually bankrupt"

 
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Feb, 2004 09:11 pm
Yes, I see that myself, Craven, in that I don't mind "intellectually dishonest" at all, it makes me look for where I am lousing up, and did even as I was typing understand that others might take umbrage to those words. Wording, wording. I am not at all arguing (well, me, argue, of course not) your ideas. Intellectually undefended, whatever. Bankrupt has resonance, somehow, perhaps by usage, of more than goofing up a discussion.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Feb, 2004 09:12 pm
Quote:
Simple description is adequate.


Well, in that case there's subjective disagreement on what is and is not a "simple description" beyond that of what is and what is not "adequate".

I posit that it has a lot less to do with what is simple and a lot more to do with what is pejorative.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Feb, 2004 09:16 pm
ossobuco wrote:
Bankrupt has resonance, somehow, perhaps by usage, of more than goofing up a discussion.


I'm not sure if I made clear enough that I don't call people either intellectually dishonest or intellectually bankrupt.

I've not used either to descibe a person.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Feb, 2004 10:06 pm
I got that you described the arguments, whatever they were, that way, not the people. I am railing at your choice of words to decry an argument because I think that even though I gather you think those phrases are equal in content, I think they hit posters' ears differently, one being more of a personal slice than the other, even if it was directed at the attempted argument.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Feb, 2004 11:25 pm
Intellectually dishonest rings truer to me. Bankrupcy would mean a person is wholy without intellegence or intellect. That would be dishonest.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Feb, 2004 07:40 pm
truth
Ceili, I still favor the moralist perspective. To be intellectually bankrupt is not to be stupid, ignorant, or incapable of intellectual acuity. It best connotes a lack of intellectual integrity.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 06/19/2021 at 12:56:27