@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil Albuquerque wrote:...of course value exists although some of its vectors have relative referents,...
That was the point of my original response, that although life has “value” it is directly inherent to the “relative referents of its vectors”. A case by case basis, perceived by an individual, if it exist at all.
Fil Albuquerque wrote:..., but not its structure or do you think life and its organization are a chaotic collection of actions without priority's ???
Your oversimplifying too much to ascertain the specificity of your argument… (Although I think your just getting either sidetracked or possible your just diverting) Life CAN BE (and sometimes for lack of a better understanding) a random collection of actions without priority’s, at least in the sense of priorities you speak of later in your original post. You stated that
Fil Albuquerque wrote: ...life has value...
Are we talking about life’s value or the value of its actions (organized or otherwise). The point I’m trying to make is, that they are not the same thing.
Fil Albuquerque wrote:We are morally obliged to take care of the less fortunate.
Why? because you say so? There are plenty of (if not most) life forms and/or people out there that I consider to have value, but to say that it’s equal across the board or automatic, I find that to be erroneous.
Fil Albuquerque wrote:Opinion ? First even opinions have causes they don't come about without constrains.
No ****, wasn’t saying otherwise…
And the rest of the post is a continuous tirade. One, that anyone with a basic understanding of social structure can spew and I find it to be pointless to comment on except for with the following…duh.