Reply
Wed 6 Jun, 2012 02:53 am
Over at Facebook, they have taken to promoting some goofy web site which puts up short vids about the rich and famous (or the moderately well-off and slightly notorious--it's hard for me to tell). Their latest is "Kelly Ripa leg-cross." Now, leaving aside that i've never heard of Kelly Ripa (and have no interest), what the hell is going on here? Is it 1950 again? Are we in the sixth grade? A woman who crosses her legs while wearing a skirt is showing far less thigh than a woman doing anything while wearing a pair of shorts. Are female thighs more salacious when beneath a skirt than when below a pair of shorts? Somebody help me out here . . .
@Setanta,
maybe she was demonstrating the new Republican sponsored birth control method, just cross your legs girls
That makes as much sense as anything else . . .
I saw the video and all I could think was - What? All she did was cross her legs. I too wondered why it was considered noteworthy.
@edgarblythe,
Yeah . . . sixth grade stuff, Bosss . . .
@Setanta,
socialcam? that is bad viral spam
report it if you see it anywhere - x it off the page
I didn't go look at it--i never look at that kind of stuff. They want "permissions," which essentially means they want the info from your profile.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace