@Lustig Andrei,
Lustig Andrei wrote:Nobody except the owner/management of an apartment complex has such jurisdiction, do they?
Yes, thay
DON 'T,
but the problem is one of
USURPATION, which has plenty of precedent in America.
From our knowledge of history and from our reading of the Constitution,
it is more than abundantly clear that government was never granted power
to interfere with ingestion of opium, either, but a
liberal interpretation was applied,
to
deviate from personal freedom from governmental intrusion.
The seductive temptation was:
social welfare. It has prevailed until this minute.
Lustig Andrei wrote: I can see that a prohibition against smoking in one's apartment may be imposed as a condition of tenancy
I have selected
non-smokers to be my tenanats
and to be my employees as attorneys, or support staff.
I detest the stench of tobacco cigarettes; marijuana is not as bad as that.
When I took in my girlfriend, Maralyn (hopelessly addicted to tobacco),
I made her agree to do
ALL of her smoking outside. She did.
Lustig Andrei wrote:by the authority of the entity which owns and operates the building,
but certainly not a governmental body.
AGREED!
Lustig Andrei wrote:That, it seems to me, is a clear violation of the right to privacy guarantees in the US Constitution.
Is Bloomberg actually that off-the-wall nuts?
I don't know.
I 'm sure that he is
BRILLIANT. I don 't know if he is sane.
David