The Myth of a Palestinian People

Do you have any other interests you could post about, JoeBruno?

Like, wanna share some recipes?

Or tell us about what you've been reading lately?

Or do you have some thoughts on the Euro & the EU?

Sorry, I haven't even read many of your threads or your comments, but it's clear you're becoming a wee bit montonous & kinda boring.

he's the semitic jgoldman10

i've seen pictures of them, i'm pretty sure they're people

they're definitely human beings, just like the jews

Rather reminds me of those "all black people are evil"-type threads.
I mean, who reads them after a while?
You don't actually need to, because you know exactly what the gist of each fresh post is going to be without even looking.

i gave up on PR and her crew, but so far i like poking mr. bruno, though i've been informed he now ignores me

me, can you believe it

i may cry

I'm sure you asked for it, dj!
Got just what you deserved!

Here is something you didn't know:If you don't like my posts, don't read them.

See how easy that was?If you had an IQ above 40, you could have figured it out yourself.

i once knew this guy named malcolm, for some reason you'd always find him in the centre of things, he said something profound

"You're not the boss of me"

I just sort of skim over them (or the thread titles) , Joe.
Like I said, they are kinda predictable.
I'm always interested in new posters to the site, but you're proving to be something of a disappointment, after a very short time!

Seriously, how do you expect people to respond to your repetitive "message"?

Alas, my iPad won't play the linked video, but if it resembles the argument made by Newt Gingrich, it's accurate.

"Palestinians" are a fiction in the sense that they have nothing approaching a long history as a people, and began their "Palestinian" existence as a group of Arabs who found themselves living in an area that was identifiable because of the West's dismantling of the Ottoman Empire.

Clearly there is now a group of people who self-identify as "Palestinians," but any historical claims that extend beyond a few decades are specious.

Whether or not this has any bearing on the "Palestinian" issue is a separate discussion, but basing the so-called "Right of Return" on an historical legacy is pretty ridiculous.

I see what you did there

Cycloptichorn

Why actually refer to history when bullshit is so much more entertaining, and doesn't require hard things like thinking and study.

The first mention of Palestine of which i know was by Herodotus almost 2400 years ago. It would be interesting to know upon what basis clowns claim that there were no Palestinian people before, say, the dismantling of the Osmanli Empire. Who live there before that? Nobody?

Oh i know, base your "right of return" on your ancestors having been one among several peoples who lived there almost 2000 years ago. Yeah, that's a good idea--kill anyone who gets in your way.

The Father of Lies also "mentioned" Atlanteans and the Egyptian army using Phoenix as weapons., so I guess we can consider him an authority on Palestinians.

Actual historians, as opposed to those of us who are merely interested in the subject, are conflicted on the subject and so each of us could be wrongly right.

Oh, you mean in much the same way Americans are an invented people?

Yeah, so what?

I know of no "actual historian" who is "conflicted" on this subject. Perhaps you have been reading (yeah, right) some zionist shills. The expression "the father of lies" comes from the bible, from John, Chapter Eight, verse 44--it is a reference to "the devil." You must really think people around here are stupid, to attempt to get away with bullshit such as that.

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

Herodotus does not "mention" anything that he has not seen himself; he otherwise simply reports what people had told him. He visited Palestine himself, and he mentions Palestine at least a half dozen times. This is a typical Finn performance--since you can't answer the post, you just make **** up and attempt to turn it into a sneer. The result, however, reveals you to be a devotee of the father of lies.

Well since you don't know of them, they must not exist.

I'm surprised that as often as your reference Herodotus that you are not aware that while he is generally known as The Father of History, he is also referred to as The Father of Lies of by many.

See...googling "Father of Lies" led you astray. A very typical Setanta performance.

I didn't have to google anything, i was already familiar with the scriptural reference. Just as i'm familiar with your bullshit routine. You've got no case, which is nothing new.

By the way, dipshit, i wasn't denying that Herodotus reports extravagent claims, he does it all the time. However, he carefully states that this is what he was told, he doesn't report it as the truth. You wouldd know that if you had read The Histories--which i suspect you never have.