@BillRM,
Quote:
Just because congress had not used this power on members for medical reasons in the past does not mean that they can not do so at their whim!!!!!!
You think that Congress has the Constitutional authority to unseat a member, who has been duly elected by the people,
on whim? Or because of medical reasons? You are such an ignorant fool, you really just embarrass yourself with such foolish comments.
Quote:Expulsion is the most serious form of
disciplinary action that can be taken against a Member of Congress. Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution provides that "Each House [of Congress] may determine the Rules of its proceedings, punish its members
for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member."
Process leading to expulsion
Presently, the disciplinary process begins when a resolution to expel or censure a Member is referred to the appropriate committee. In the House, this is the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct (House Ethics Committee); in the Senate, this is the Select Committee on Ethics (Senate Ethics Committee).
The committee may then ask other Representatives or Senators to come forward with complaints about the Member under consideration or may initiate an investigation into the Member's actions. Sometimes Members may refer a resolution calling for an investigation into a particular Member or matter that may lead to the recommendation of expulsion or censure.
Rule XI (Procedures of committees and unfinished business) of the Rules of the House of Representatives state that the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct can investigate allegations that a Member violated "any law, rule, regulation, or other standard of conduct applicable to the conduct of such Member... in the performance of his duties or the discharge of his responsibilities". The Senate Select Committee on Ethics has the same jurisdiction. The committee may then report back to their whole chamber as to its findings and recommendations for further actions.
When an investigation is launched by either committee, an investigatory subcommittee will be formed. Once the investigatory subcommittee has collected evidence, talked to witnesses, and held an adjudicatory hearing it will vote on whether the Member is found to have committed the specific actions and then will vote on recommendations. If expulsion is the recommendation then the subcommittee's report will be referred to the full House of Representatives or Senate where Members may vote to accept, reject, or alter the report's recommendation. Voting to expel requires the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present and voting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress
Giffords was not guilty of "disorderly conduct", she did not violate any "any law, rule, regulation, or other standard of conduct", she did not commit treason, she did not take bribes, and nothing she did, or failed to do, could possibly have justified such severe
disciplinary action as expulsion, and your assertion that Congress could have voted to expel her, or any other member, "on whim" is just plain absurd.
This topic appears over your head, BillRM. Even your hypotheticals should have some connection to reality.
Being shot in the head, and being absent from Washington during a period of recovery, does not qualify as reasons for expulsion.