Is it possible for the state or existance where everything is possible, even though the existance of such a state would also make it possible for everything to also be not possible. But if it were not possible how would it be possible for it to have ever defined the absolute with out reference.
I have argued extensively on this forum that "existence" is relative, never absolute. Thus the existence of "a thing " implies the existence of "a thinger".There is only co-existence.Things and thingers are ontologically co-extensive.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace