1
   

Apollo 16 Brought Two Skulls from Moon?

 
 
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2012 10:33 pm
Here is one fossil skull http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/detail/?mission=Apollo%2016&sample=60135
Remains of neurons, brain cells, and blood vessels are found in these two micrographs http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apollo%2016&sample=60135&source_id=JSC03939
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apollo%2016&sample=60135&source_id=JSC03941

and marked in Edit [Moderator]: Link removed
Edit [Moderator]: Link removed

Here is another fractured fossil skull http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/detail/?mission=Apollo%2016&sample=60095

Read more at Edit [Moderator]: Link removed
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 1 • Views: 2,765 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2012 10:49 pm
@bewildered,
can you say pyroclast?
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2012 11:01 pm
@farmerman,
given the neighborhood I reside in, I can certainly say it. Along with volcanoclastic. And quartz. And basalt. And . .
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2012 11:03 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Im thinking that our friend bewildered suffers from a lack of fiber in his diet
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2012 11:08 pm
@farmerman,
Well, you have to admit that his nom-de-net is aptly chosen.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2012 12:42 am
I'll tell you what nobody should have an easy time believing...

That from the end of WW-II until around 1970 or thereabouts all anybody ever heard about in schools in this county was getting to the moon before Russia did, giant programs, giant expenses, the whole national purpose in lilfe until finally they do it, make a couple or three or four more trips back there and then:

Quote:
The moon?? Oh, yeah, been there, done that, now it's time to get back to the serious business of fighting demoKKKrat wars (Nam) and perfecting our welfare state...


Or could it be that whatever they found up there freaked them so bad that they either couldn't handle it and canceled all further such projects for quasi-religious reasons, or made the whole subject area into black-op business and we just never read about it any more??


0 Replies
 
bewildered
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2012 02:11 am
@farmerman,
Can you show me a micrograph of pyroclasts with veins like these
Edit [Moderator]: Link removed
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2012 08:21 am
@bewildered,
If you looked at the thin sections that you posted (and , of course, you have to understand what your looking at), you will see that thin sections of the pyroclasts contain magamatic crystalline emplaced FELDPSARS and what appear to be Ferro silocates like peridotite. As far as I know, we dont have any skulls that are pyroclastics.

If these were skulls why didnt NASA hold em up and say WOWEEE! look what we found on the moon?

Are you claiming some big conspiracy by JPL and NASA? Why then do they publish the photos and thin sections and let folks like you take shots at them?

You really need some intensive training in thin section petrology because You are a total idiot (However, I do wait in eager anticipation of what your going to "discover" next)
bewildered
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jan, 2012 02:57 am
@farmerman,
Just show me the micrograph I requested.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 15 Jan, 2012 05:54 am
@bewildered,
Look you idiot, the mineral makeup f the polarized thin sections clearly shows that these are pyroclasts. How many skulls you know made of igneous minerals?
You dont have a ckue about what youre looking at. I once found a "dendrite" on a slick rock surface when I was a kid. It looked like a fossil tree and I was convinced of its fossil importnace as a recording of past worlds. I then started following up and found a mineralogy expert at the delaware NAT HISTORY MUSEUM .(tHE GUY WAS A MEMBER OF THE Dupont family and he gave the museum building to the state)It was really a ploy to house his mineral collection. ANyway, he told me about dendrites and we wpent time among the collections seeing others. I learned that fossils can also have "Pseudomorphs".
You have a (And not even a really good one) "pseudomorph" that is a pyroclast having a sub spherical shape but a clear mineral makeup.

When you post **** like this you are showing us that you arent very impressed with knowledge , you are, more likely, pushing some sort of quasi religious agenda.
bewildered
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jan, 2012 08:26 am
@farmerman,
Still no disproof.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jan, 2012 08:31 am
i'm guessing that nasa brought a skull per astronaut back from the moon every time they went there, unless the astronauts didn't have skulls (maybe that's why they wore those hard helmets Confused )
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jan, 2012 09:18 am
@bewildered,
Quote:

Still no disproof.
Thats only because youre tooignorant to understand what you are claiming. Find me an igneous "Skull " in the fossil record ANYWHERE!!

Ya cant,? see what I mean?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Apollo 16 Brought Two Skulls from Moon?
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 09/28/2022 at 08:45:11