Apollo 16 Brought Two Skulls from Moon?

can you say pyroclast?

given the neighborhood I reside in, I can certainly say it. Along with volcanoclastic. And quartz. And basalt. And . .

Im thinking that our friend bewildered suffers from a lack of fiber in his diet

Well, you have to admit that his nom-de-net is aptly chosen.

I'll tell you what nobody should have an easy time believing...

That from the end of WW-II until around 1970 or thereabouts all anybody ever heard about in schools in this county was getting to the moon before Russia did, giant programs, giant expenses, the whole national purpose in lilfe until finally they do it, make a couple or three or four more trips back there and then:



Or could it be that whatever they found up there freaked them so bad that they either couldn't handle it and canceled all further such projects for quasi-religious reasons, or made the whole subject area into black-op business and we just never read about it any more??

Can you show me a micrograph of pyroclasts with veins like these
Edit [Moderator]: Link removed

If you looked at the thin sections that you posted (and , of course, you have to understand what your looking at), you will see that thin sections of the pyroclasts contain magamatic crystalline emplaced FELDPSARS and what appear to be Ferro silocates like peridotite. As far as I know, we dont have any skulls that are pyroclastics.

If these were skulls why didnt NASA hold em up and say WOWEEE! look what we found on the moon?

Are you claiming some big conspiracy by JPL and NASA? Why then do they publish the photos and thin sections and let folks like you take shots at them?

You really need some intensive training in thin section petrology because You are a total idiot (However, I do wait in eager anticipation of what your going to "discover" next)

Just show me the micrograph I requested.

Look you idiot, the mineral makeup f the polarized thin sections clearly shows that these are pyroclasts. How many skulls you know made of igneous minerals?
You dont have a ckue about what youre looking at. I once found a "dendrite" on a slick rock surface when I was a kid. It looked like a fossil tree and I was convinced of its fossil importnace as a recording of past worlds. I then started following up and found a mineralogy expert at the delaware NAT HISTORY MUSEUM .(tHE GUY WAS A MEMBER OF THE Dupont family and he gave the museum building to the state)It was really a ploy to house his mineral collection. ANyway, he told me about dendrites and we wpent time among the collections seeing others. I learned that fossils can also have "Pseudomorphs".
You have a (And not even a really good one) "pseudomorph" that is a pyroclast having a sub spherical shape but a clear mineral makeup.

When you post **** like this you are showing us that you arent very impressed with knowledge , you are, more likely, pushing some sort of quasi religious agenda.

Still no disproof.

i'm guessing that nasa brought a skull per astronaut back from the moon every time they went there, unless the astronauts didn't have skulls (maybe that's why they wore those hard helmets )

Thats only because youre tooignorant to understand what you are claiming. Find me an igneous "Skull " in the fossil record ANYWHERE!!

Ya cant,? see what I mean?