0
   

Is Plato's Tripartite Theory of the Soul (as outlined in the Book IV, 435c - 441d) defensible?

 
 
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2011 11:12 pm
It's based on the Law of Non-Contradiction (436c), but that would imply that there could easily be more than three parts of the soul (i.e. say you have just come to the end of a delicious dinner and have one sip of water [D] and one bite of food [E] left; you want to consume both, but eating either would fill you up and you are conflicted [(D & ~E) & (~D & E)], which would imply that the appetitive part of the soul could be divided into two parts, resulting in a four-part soul). Knowing this, is there any way Plato's Tripartite Theory of the Soul can be defended?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 1,872 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
bluemist phil
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2012 08:58 pm
@Momentum,
Depends on what you call defensible. If we accept Plato's PNC, then there will be distinct parts of the soul and of the state, each of which is related to its Idea, or to a specific universal concept. This much is logically coherent. When he decides that there are three parts, one could ask why not four or five? His choice appears to have been made on the number he thinks common sense will support. This is a pragmatic consideration, not one based in deduction. Common sense is different today than it was in ancient Athens, so we could pick a different number of divisions.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
DOES NOTHING EXIST??? - Question by mark noble
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is Plato's Tripartite Theory of the Soul (as outlined in the Book IV, 435c - 441d) defensible?
Copyright © 2017 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/15/2017 at 08:00:18