3
   

Remakes. What's the Point?

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jan, 2004 03:05 am
Indeed......lol...smooch....
0 Replies
 
oldandknew
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jan, 2004 01:56 pm
doing a remake saves on script writers fee, saves on creative input by director, camera angles and lighting is easier to set up by coping the original, editors job is a bit like cut & paste & the sound track is just noise in stereo.

yours sincerely

BORCFE >>>>>
By One Retired Cynical Film Editor
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jan, 2004 03:49 pm
OAK, Excellent point. Money, again. And speed and ease. It's sometimes hard for me to remember that movies and books and other art forms are also businesses. It took me a long time to accept the fact that in publishing books are products.

Money makes the world go around
The world go around
The world go around
0 Replies
 
MisterEThoughts
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jan, 2004 04:13 pm
I love the remakes because it makes me interested more plus they can add new things to it.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jan, 2004 04:28 pm
"The Lord of the Rings" is essentially a remake but they didn't get it right the first time around -- they didn't have CGI effects, for one reason. I don't think anyone will think of remaking it once again unless it's in hologram 3-D.
0 Replies
 
kaylee8
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Mar, 2004 06:37 pm
The last remake of LAST OF THE MOHICANS was superior to the Randolph Scott version.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Mar, 2004 11:17 pm
That's for sure.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/04/2022 at 07:16:54