Why do you suppose Jesus never condemned slavery?

If we behaved like this today would we be considered psychopathic?

If you behaved like you do now in a society unchanged from the one you are so knowledgeable about you would be leading man for the next human sacrifice ceremony.

Only because the Christian religion became established north and west of where it was seeded.

If you behaved like you do now in a society unchanged

spendius wrote:

Quote:

First...show me where I said anything of the sort of thing that I enlarged.

I only asked you what use we can find for why we might suppose Jesus never condemned slavery.

Nonsense. You did much more than that...which was the reason I enlarged part of what you did.

Now...respond to what I asked you about the enlarged part of your quote. Or grow the balls to acknowledge that you cannot.

And you can leave your sexual fears, frustrations, and obsessions out of the response. The do not apply to me.

Frank I think you are wasting your time with spendius "no mater how much fun it may seem.

I think spendius is not much different than you or I. We seem to be the passengers of the ride our unconscious minds take us on.

You would probably be a valuable asset to the thread "what is free will"

I have learned a lot myself.

My initial thoughts are: Free will can be defined in a way that requires that humans cannot possess it.

It can also be defined in a way that shows every human possesses it.

I would be ASTONISHED to find a general agreement on which it is.

So you do not see it as a psychopath behavior?

So you do not see it as a psychopath behavior?



No I don't. I would need to be as stupid, arrogant and self-validating as you are in order to think of it in those terms.

OK let me reword it in terms that may be closer to your heart.

Quote:

OK let me reword it in terms that may be closer to your heart.

Just answer the points I raised. Hysterical ravings are Apisa's domain.

Would you have started the Hebrew CLU had you been there?

Jesus did do. He was there. It cost Him His life.

The Founding Fathers maintained their position by approving slavery. They didn't just not condemn slavery. They passed laws to return runaway slaves and to punish anybody who spoke out publicly against slavery

to count them as 3/5ths of whites for population purposes.

I would have asked many questions so that people would question what they thought was true.

Do you have any evidence to this claim?

Let me guess you find this to be a moral act?

What evidence do you have for this singly being a population purposes?

spendius you seem to be an extremist conservative in your positions, do you think that fathers should still keep the jewels of their daughter's virginity?

I would have asked many questions so that people would question what they thought was true.



Oh yeah!!

The thread is fatuous from every point of view I can think of except that a pipsqueak bozo somewhere in the alleys of NJ is seeking to prove that our traditional religion has got it all wrong on the rumpy-pumpy issues and with your full support.

I think it was something to do with allocation of federal funds. Whites counted one and slaves counted 3/5ths or possibly 2/3rds.

Not really. Most fathers think that in my experience. It's unprincipled

I'm a ******* atheist for ****'s sake rl. How many more times do you need telling. Atheists don't do moral acts.

Have you heard what your little brother has been saying about you lately?

It is less than 2 minutes long.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7TWZEg7-gQ&feature=c4-overview&list=UUtlfyd1Xs9CtxfBNP9_IgAw[/youtube]

The thread is fatuous from every point of view I can think of except that a pipsqueak bozo somewhere in the alleys of NJ is seeking to prove that our traditional religion has got it all wrong on the rumpy-pumpy issues and with your full support.

Did not bother to view the video...but anyone who thinks "an agnostic is just an atheist who doesn't know it"...doesn't know what he/she is talking about.