@reasoning logic,
Nope...I am suggesting that since these practices have...Why not come out and explain exactly why one believes this God is evil and immoral?, and then a theist of this God and an atheist, or doubter can actually get together and get something productive discussed about this God, or any other God...Rather than theists trying to explain why an atheist does not reject anything and just chooses to believe that this God or any other God may be evil...While atheists keep asking for proof that they do, because it seems they do not understand that they believe things and know why they do...Or do not believe things, because they believe things and know why they do...Or were born without an instinctive ability to know what they believe or do not believe because they believe things and why...So that this one big circle can actually go somewhere and actually progress...
Atheists already know what theists believe about this God or any other God that may exist...
Tell us theists what it is that you believe, or what you do not believe, because you believe this...and a theist can actually try to explain why they do believe, and do not believe, because they believe this...
It doesn't do any good to explain how one thinks a God is not real because they reject it...Then explain how fucked up this God is without explaining why you believe it is true, and not also explaining how they reject it is true... because they know it is not an accurate or truthful statement but are being stubborn...
How could anyone try to explain their views or validate that subjectively for someone else? Think about that one for me, and get back to me when you come up with an idea...