2
   

Famed fossil isn't a bird after all, analysis says

 
 
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:50 am
Famed fossil isn't a bird after all, analysis says
By MALCOLM RITTER - AP Science Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — One of the world's most famous fossil creatures, widely considered the earliest known bird, is getting a rude present on the 150th birthday of its discovery: A new analysis suggests it isn't a bird at all.

Chinese scientists are proposing a change to the evolutionary family tree that boots Archaeopteryx off the "bird" branch and onto a closely related branch of birdlike dinosaurs.

Archaeopteryx (ahr-kee-AHP'-teh-rihx) was a crow-sized creature that lived about 150 million years ago. It had wings and feathers, but also quite un-birdlike traits like teeth and a bony tail. Discovered in 1861 in Germany, two years after Charles Darwin published "On the Origin of Species," it quickly became an icon for evolution and has remained popular since.

The Chinese scientists acknowledge they have only weak evidence to support their proposal, which hinges on including a newly recognized dinosaur.

Other experts say the change could easily be reversed by further discoveries. And while it might shake scientific understanding within the bird lineage, they said, it doesn't make much difference for some other evolutionary questions.

Archaeopteryx dwells in a section of the family tree that's been reshuffled repeatedly over the past 15 or 20 years and still remains murky. It contains the small, two-legged dinosaurs that took the first steps toward flight. Fossil discoveries have blurred the distinction between dinosaurlike birds and birdlike dinosaurs, with traits such as feathers and wishbones no longer seen as reliable guides.

"Birds have been so embedded within this group of small dinosaurs ... it's very difficult to tell who is who," said Lawrence Witmer of Ohio University, who studies early bird evolution but didn't participate in the new study.

The proposed reclassification of Archaeopteryx wouldn't change the idea that birds arose from this part of the tree, he said, but it could make scientists reevaluate what they think about evolution within the bird lineage itself.

"Much of what we've known about the early evolution of birds has in a sense been filtered through Archaeopteryx," Witmer said. "Archaeopteryx has been the touchstone... (Now) the centerpiece for many of those hypotheses may or may not be part of that lineage."

The new analysis is presented in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature by Xing Xu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, and colleagues. They compared 384 specific anatomical traits of 89 species to figure out how the animals were related. The result was a tree that grouped Archaeopteryx with deinonychosaurs, two-legged meat-eaters that are evolutionary cousins to birds.

But that result appeared only when the analysis included a previously unknown dinosaur that's similar to Archaeopteryx, which the researchers dubbed Xiaotingia zhengi. It was about the size of a chicken when it lived some 160 million years ago in the Liaoning province of China, home to many feathered dinosaurs and early birds.

Julia Clarke of the University of Texas at Austin, who did not participate in the study, said the reclassification appeared to be justified by the current data. But she emphasized the study dealt with a poorly understood section of the evolutionary tree, and that more fossil discoveries could very well shift Archaeopteryx back to the "bird" branch.

Anyway, moving it "a couple of branches" isn't a huge change, and whether it's considered a bird or not is mostly a semantic issue that doesn't greatly affect larger questions about the origin of flight, she said.

Luis Chiappe, an expert in early bird evolution at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County who wasn't part of the new study, said he doesn't think the evidence is very solid.

"I feel this needs to be reassessed by other people, and I'm sure it will be," he said.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 1,246 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:55 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Ancestor of all birds knocked from its perch
AFP By Laurent Banguet

A handout photo released on July 26, by Nature magazine, shows the fossil of Xiaotingia Zhengi, a previously unknown species of bird-like dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of China. Xing Xu and colleagues describe the fossilized remains of a small, feathered, Archaeopteryx-like dinosaur, weighing about 0.8 kg

A handout photo released on July 26, by Nature magazine, shows the fossil of Xiaotingia …

A handout illustration released on July 26, by Nature magazine shows an artists impression of Xiaotingia Zhengi, a previously unknown species of bird-like dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of China. Xing Xu and colleagues describe the fossilized remains of a small, feathered, Archaeopteryx-like dinosaur, weighing about 0.8 kg

A handout illustration released on July 26, by Nature magazine shows an artists impression …

The winged Archaeopteryx, long venerated as the forebear of birds, has been knocked off its hallowed perch on the tree of evolution, according to a study released Wednesday.

A new dinosaur species unearthed in northern China reveals that the iconic 150 million year old "original bird" is probably just another dino with feathers, of which there are many, the researchers said.

It is hard to imagine a harder fall from evolutionary grace.

Since its discovery 150 years ago in Bavaria, most scientists placed Archaeopteryx squarely at the root of the broad group of proto-birds, known as Avialae, from which our modern feathered friends have emerged.

The emblematic creature was also held up as a case study -- THE case study during the late 19th century -- of evolutionary transition, to wit, from dinosaur to bird.

Over the years, a few scientists have gingerly expressed doubts, pointing to supposedly defining bird-like characteristics -- feathers, the wishbone, three-fingered hands -- that were also showing up in non-avian dinosaurs.

But without hard proof that Archaeopteryx was not really where it belonged on the so-called phylogenetic tree, the presumed progenitor continued to reign over its feathered kingdom.

Enter Xing Xu, a professor at Linyi University in China's Shandong Province and discoverer extraordinaire of dinosaur fossils.

In the new study, published in Nature, Xu and colleagues describe the attributes of a previously unknown dinosaur the fossil of which was found in Liaoning Province, in China's northeast.

About the size of a chicken and probably weighing less than a kilo (about two pounds), Xiaotingia shared a host of key characteristics with Archaeopteryx but seemed, at the same time, to fall into another group of non-avian dinos called Deinonychosauria.

A standard computer analysis confirmed as much, but at the same time produced a stunning result: Archaeopteryx had been reclassified into the same group.

"In other words, Archaeopteryx was no longer a bird," Lawrence Witmer, a professor at Ohio university's Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, said in a commentary, also in Nature.

Xiaotingia, it turns out, was the smoking gun that sceptical scientists had been looking for.

Surprised by their findings, Xu and his team ran the analysis again, but this time without the newly discovered species. Archaeopteryx was restored -- in error, they now knew -- to its previous perch.

Xu has called for further confirmation, but suggests that his discovery will overturn long-held assumptions about the "avian ancestral condition."

"Perhaps the time has come to finally accept that Archaeopteryx was just another small, feathered, bird-like theropod fluttering around in the Jurassic," Witmer said.

One reason it has been so hard for biologists to embrace this idea may have more to do with history than science.

The first Archaeopteryx specimen was discovered, with uncanny timing, less than two years after the publication of Charles Darwin's game-changing Origin of the Species.

With an evenly matched blend of avian and reptilian features, it became -- in textbooks and public debate -- "Exhibit A" in explaining the transformative power of natural selection and evolution.

"The familiar fossils have guided almost all scientific thought about the beginnings of birds," Witman said, including himself among those led astray.

It's reclassification, he added, is likely to "rock the palaeontological community for years to come."

Who are the new candidates for king of the roost?

No single species is likely to ever gain the stature that Archaeopteryx once had, said Xu.

But among the new pretenders, three newly discovered creatures stand out: Epidexipteryx, Jeholornis, and Sapeornis.
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:58 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Photos:

http://news.yahoo.com/famed-fossil-isnt-bird-analysis-says-170200685.html

History:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 10:16 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Science moves just like this. Archeoptery has always been a bit of an outsider because it has about 21 features of dinosauria and about 34 or mpore that are clearly bird-like. SO it really doesnt matter. The very arguments that arise are clear evidence that this animal is one of the best "intermediates" we can view in the fossil record.
NEVER accept any fist level report of a find. It is almost guaranteed to be changed by further inspection.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 01:32 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:

Archaeopteryx dwells in a section of the family tree that's been reshuffled repeatedly over the past 15 or 20 years and still remains murky. It contains the small, two-legged dinosaurs that took the first steps toward flight. Fossil discoveries have blurred the distinction between dinosaurlike birds and birdlike dinosaurs, with traits such as feathers and wishbones no longer seen as reliable guides.

All this shuffling isn't surprising given that this creature is so close to the point of divergence.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Famed fossil isn't a bird after all, analysis says
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:56:40