@igm,
every conceivable 'position' with regard to religion, reality, life or any other human concept, is necessarily limited and based on false assumptions.
i agree with you that an agnostic is more logical than a theist or atheist. but being agnostic is limited in logic also, because it implies that you still consider the possibility of a god. this means you are still a slave to the concept of god vs no god, maintaining an 'i don't know' position. this implies there is a possible resolution to the question.
non-duality offers a resolution to the question, as a paradoxical truth that everything that exists is all one thing, and because of this, it is itself not necessarily 'absolutely existent'. therefore the question of the absolute existence of anything, whether it is god or the material universe or consciousness, does not arise anymore, because the very questioner does not absolutely exist anymore.
however, clinging to the concept of non duality as the ultimate solution to the question of god vs atheism vs agnosticism is also another illusion, because what non duality points to is an eternal nothingness, which cannot actually resolve any finite human problems.
