1
   

NASA covered up Martian microscopies.

 
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Jul, 2011 03:34 am
@bewildered,
bewildered wrote:

Don't use chemistry to identify fossil cells:
Edit [Moderator]: Link removed
What should be used if not chemistry and context?
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Jul, 2011 05:23 am
@bewildered,
Quote:
Don't use chemistry to identify fossil cells:


1First assume everything is a "fossil cell"

2Exclude all evidence that does not support this idea

3Go out and scurry around with meaningless interpretations based upon silly assumptions

4Find what youve expwected would be there all along

5Tell everyone that these are hunks of tissue torn from the host without leaving any hard evidence (The mars soil is awash in blood vessels and red blood cells and thats all)


Im not done even considering more scientific critiques,Im just having fun with how your mind works. Youd make a better engineer than a scientist. You get something in your head and then pursue it to death(or maybe invention as the case may be).

You must learn all the tools we have at hand besides some microscope. We have aerial spectrophotometers on the rovers and we are getting chemistry whether you want it or not. The chemoistry does NOT support your worldview.

ANd your back story about the ancient cib=vilizations etc is absent any proof or evidence so Id not link the two, it makes you look even more foolish.
bewildered
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Jul, 2011 06:57 pm
@rosborne979,
Morphology on the micron/nano level is to be used for material to be studied.
Morphology is unique on that level in most cases, at least in differentiating cells from minerals.
0 Replies
 
bewildered
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Jul, 2011 03:32 am
@farmerman,
Read
Edit [Moderator]: Link removed
and criticize my claim that no minerals match the martian muscle fibers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2018 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/16/2018 at 11:42:49