@Mame,
Mame wrote:
I am still wondering about that - what was that all about? Why throw him in the ocean at all? Why not just kill him, take a picture, then give him back to his family for whatever they would do with him? Or why not keep the proof for people at home? Have there been any pictures of him with bullet holes? Not that that would mean anything these days.
Well, they did kill him, and they did take pictures of his corpse.
If is body was returned to "his family," it would likely be the foundation of a jihadi shrine. Not a smart move.
Why would the US want to keep his corpse? Obama won't release the gory photos because "we don't spike the football." Apparently he can't even imagine a valid reason for revealing them. Nope,if you disagree with his decisions, you must be a jingoistic troglodyte.
I'm all for keeping his corpse and displaying it in the Smithsonian or Ripley's.
Maybe we could have a national lottery in which an American family might win the right to display his mummified cadaver on their front porch or in their hot tube.
He long ago forfeited any right to civilized treatment.