19
   

Did Waterboarding lead to the death of Osama?

 
 
DrewDad
 
  3  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:21 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Logical fallacies all over the place...
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:24 am
@DrewDad,
Rhetorical meaningless posts all over the place.
DrewDad
 
  2  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:29 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Because popularity is what makes something right or wrong.....
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:30 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
At least I'm not fooled by my own rhetoric.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:34 am
@DrewDad,
And then we get more meaningless rhetoric. Yaaaawwwwwnnnn.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:34 am
@DrewDad,
Mr. Dubois gets fooled by his own reflection.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:36 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

So we can't waterboard a terrorist because that would be "torture,
Yes because at that point the person is under your control.

Quote:
but we can shoot an unarmed terrorist in the eyeball. Welcome to la la land.


This was during a military operation where the intent and weapons that person might have are unknown. It's nice that you feel competent enough to second guess the SEALS that were there Renaldo. You must be a big man on your block. The only one in la la land is you Renaldo. You are a stupid a-hole and should be called out as such.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:38 am
Everyone is laughing at you, parados. We can all see I'm in your head.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:41 am
@parados,
Parados said

The only one in la la land is you Renaldo. You are a stupid a-hole and should be called out as such.

I think you're being very unfair to a lot of stupid a-holes out there. They at least know how to use a spoon, a skill Mr. Dubois still needs to acquire.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:42 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Life must be pretty sweet in your little fantasy universe.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  0  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:42 am
Thanks for the encouragement and letting me know my posts are effective.
0 Replies
 
Renaldo Dubois
 
  0  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:43 am
@DrewDad,
Well, yes, my life is very sweet. I am very happy. I don't know what else to tell ya. I know YOU would be much happier if I was as miserable as you.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 07:52 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

Everyone is laughing at you, parados.
That's nice

Quote:
We can all see I'm in your head.
We can all see through yours.

You are an armchair idiot that thinks you can call Navy SEALS murderers and get away with it.

Let's examine your argument.
You claim Obama is guilty of war crimes for ordering an unarmed man shot.
That would be an illegal order under the USMCJ and should be refused.
Bin Laden was shot by Navy Seals and it turned out he was unarmed.
You are accusing the Navy Seals of murder in that they purposely went there to shoot an unarmed man.

That is your entire argument Renaldo. THere is no other way to interpret your argument. You sit there and accuse the US military of murder. How does it feel to do that Renaldo? Does it make you feel like a big man? Does your dick trickle a little bit while you do it Renaldo?
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  2  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 08:03 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Millions of americans believe waterboarding is torture---so what is your point?
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 08:41 am
@raprap,
My point is that my opinion is as valid as yours.
failures art
 
  3  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 08:41 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

My, you're naive. First you give me a letter from a political hack.

You wanted people to believe Panetta earlier. Now when he clarifies this is clear language, you don't? Why the 180?

Renaldo Dubois wrote:

Then when I expose the left wing political hack who printed the letter, you now again want me to believe the letter.

What does printing the letter have to do with anything? The blogger didn't write the letter--Panetta did.

You haven't exposed anything. You are making an argument to ignore the letter because the message carrier who brought the letter is liberal. That's a logically false argument.

Renaldo Dubois wrote:

If this were a court of law, the jury would be rolling on the floor.

This is not a court. This is an internet forum. The only jury here are posters. I think you are unaware of the jury and why they are laughing.

A
R
T
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 08:46 am
@failures art,
It's your source. You're source is biased and a proven liar. You stumbled right out of the gate so you're done here.
DrewDad
 
  2  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 08:48 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Leon Panetta is biased and a proven liar?
failures art
 
  3  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 08:53 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

It's your source.

I see you're having trouble here. It's Leon Panetta. You used him earlier when he made statements you though supported your claim. Now you are pulling a 180 when he makes clear in his language that your claim was false.

Renaldo Dubois wrote:

You're source is biased and a proven liar.

Says right wing bloggers. Of course they view him as a liar. I'm sure his opinion of them is mutual.

Renaldo Dubois wrote:

You stumbled right out of the gate so you're done here.

I brought a source (Panetta) that you have used, and now you are saying he can't be used because the info came from a blogger you don't like. You omit that the letter has been verified as legitimate.

If you don't wish to believe Panetta, that is fine. It only means that you withdraw your previous statements where you attempted to use him as a source (when it suited you).

A
R
T
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 May, 2011 09:21 am
@DrewDad,
Nope. Greg Sargent is.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 01:16:56