0
   

Dinosaurs may have carried lice, gives clues to animals' evolution

 
 
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2011 10:46 am
Dinosaurs may have carried lice, scientists say
By Amina Khan, Los Angeles Times
April 10, 2011

A study of louse DNA suggests that mammals and birds may have begun to flourish before dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago.

The lowly louse may have a more impressive pedigree than once thought: Dinosaurs may have hosted the parasitic bugs, a study says.

The findings, published Tuesday in the journal Biology Letters, also show — through comparison of lice — that mammals and birds may have begun to flourish before the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. That's counter to a long-held idea that they only ascended and diversified once the dinosaurs were gone.

Lice spend their entire lives on one species, so they evolve along with their hosts. That means their similarities can be used as a way to study evolutionary relationships between the creatures they live on.

"Some people have described lice as heirlooms — they're just inherited — which is why they tend to track the evolution of their hosts pretty well," said study coauthor Kevin Johnson, an ornithologist at the University of Illinois in Champaign.

The international team of researchers looked at DNA differences between 69 modern lineages of lice that feed on various birds and mammals. Based on these DNA differences, the scientists were able to infer how much time had passed since various lice shared common ancestors.

The scientists also used fossils in building their louse family tree: a 44-million-year-old bird louse fossil and a 100-million-year-old book louse fossil (a nonparasitic louse closely related to parasitic lice). Based on the fossils' physical characteristics, the scientists were able to determine where they fit on the family tree of the lice that had been analyzed genetically. Those anchoring time points allowed them to fix dates at which other lice in the tree branched to become separate species.

From this, the researchers concluded that lice began diversifying around 125 million years ago, so their hosts — birds and mammals — must have begun diversifying well before the dinosaur die-off.

Dinosaurs may even have been the first animals to have lice, Johnson said. Reptiles have no hair or feathers onto which a louse could latch, but lice might have lived on the first feathered dinosaurs, then continued to do so as those dinosaurs evolved into birds.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 544 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2011 10:51 am
Neat---but from a creation hypothesis POV that just means the dinosaur lice missed the Arc along with the unicorns.
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2011 10:54 am
@raprap,
Laughing Idea Razz Laughing

BBB
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2011 02:31 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
I am always amazed that there are paleontologists who make their entire careers the study of mites,lice and ticks. I had one guy worked for me who's PhD was the study of one single tiny critter, a specific specie of a sea critter called a foraminiferan. (The spcies was named Globigerina (cause thats what it looked like-I woulda called it a Blobagerina).

The only saving grace was that his foram critter was key to finding oil and my guy was a stats whiz in defining where big herds of these fossils were dumped.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Dinosaurs may have carried lice, gives clues to animals' evolution
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/02/2024 at 05:56:26