Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

@reasoning logic,

Quote:

Is there any truth to this?

There is no truth in the exaggerations of Ionus but by now you should have come to expect that, RL. He badly distorts things in his usual tangential fashion because that allows him to avoid the facts.

Here's the link. The writer was a former top CIA agent.

Do you know how to use Ctrl+F to locate any word within the text? If you do, [gee, conditionals are not specific. I guess we'll have to abandon all conditionals], simply ignore the following.

Just click on the page when it comes up, then click Ctrl and f. A little box will appear probably in the upper right corner. Type in any word you want and if there is more than one of that word, click the up/down buttons to find the pertinent section.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Stockwell/StockwellCIA87_2.html

Here's a link to what might be the same speech in a YouTube video. I haven't seen this link before so I don't know.

Quote:

Americas Third World War

How 6 Million People Were Killed In CIA Secret Wars Against Third World Countries

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4068.htm

3 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

The "we" in this case is almost everybody except you!

Another survey ! When do you find time to come up with the crap you post here !

0 Replies

@reasoning logic,

Quote:

Is there any truth to this?

Of course there is no truth to it . It is just more bullshit JoinTalibanTerorism made up .

0 Replies

@JTT,

You would require a reference for the sky being blue.....if your education had included the English language I wouldnt be explaining the basics of how to construct sentences . Maybe you can sue your bosses in North Korea ?

Quote:

your nonexistent rules,

Are you assuming they dont exist because you dont know them ? Rather arrogant even for you ....

Quote:

what an ignorant no nothing you are.

Do you often tell people their points of view ? Does that come from being the only person on the planet who knows every war crime but doesnt do anything about it except wail at the USA ?

1 Reply

@JTT,

Quote:

you don't understand 'non sequitur'.

But I do...your ESP is tragic like the rest of you .

Quote:

Your 180 degree tangential answer didn't address this at all.

No it wasnt tangential . If you had a brain instead of a recorded message you WOULD have understood .

Quote:

your inane notion that people don't use non specific language.

Pathetic . People do use non-specific language that is what rules of good English try to address . Why are you so stupid ?

Quote:

some nonsense that had nothing to do with the question asked.

It answers the question specifically, you just dont have the intelligence to see it . I will help you out with a different answer.....just because....is that more understandable ?

0 Replies

@JTT,

All this pretense at being academic by you because you cant answer the question which is phrased using your rules of grammar ......How much more is more and how more is much more?

Will you answer the question or continue to plead stupidity as a defence ?

0 Replies

@JTT,

Quote:

Nice tangent.

So if you criticise me it is apt, if I point out your failings it is tangential . Very Happy

You are a laugh a minute . Do you do stand up in clubs ?

Quote:

Are you suggesting that all the great writers of the world have avoided words that are not specific?

I am suggesting you know nothing but extremes and hysteria.....seriously, you are mentally ill, right ?

Do you understand that there are exceptions to the rules or does your compulsive obsessive disorder prevent that ?

0 Replies

@JTT,

Are you denying you got all hot and excited about one of your own posts and claimed tens of thousands of breast feeding women had their breasts cut off whilst their babies watched ? Shall I go find the post ? Would you like to bet your presence here on it ?

1 Reply

@JTT,

Quote:

a YouTube video.......How 6 Million People Were Killed In CIA Secret Wars Against Third World Countries

A YouTube video.....is there any nicer expert anywhere ?

1 Reply

Personally I wish you guys would find another playground.

I was reading the news on the McClatchy news website and clicking through several articles and come across one from 4/7. Its not my normal article, spendius, but I found it interesting nonetheless.

WikiLeaks cables show U.S. took softer line toward Libya

It seems this Libya thing put the US and its efforts in other areas in a pickle. I am glad that in the end, they chose to support (if not lead) the efforts to oust Qaddafi after he responded so aggressively against Libya protesters.

From another article, it seem that last week we sent an envoy into Libya; apparently, the US is now reluctant to supply arms to Libya because they are not what the make up is of the Libya opposition.

Quote:

While the Obama administration wants Gadhafi to leave power, it's said that it won't furnish the rebels with weapons, partly out of reluctance to become more deeply involved in another Arab conflict, partly because U.S. officials say they're still trying to determine the makeup of the rebel movement.

Chris Stevens, a former official at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli who's now the Obama administration's special envoy to the opposition, arrived in Benghazi last week but has yet to meet with Hifter, both Hifter and others say.

Libyan rebel leader with U.S. ties feels abandoned

0 Replies

@Ionus,

The notion of you making a reasoned case for anything is laughable in the extreme, Anus.

1 Reply

@Ionus,

Quote:

A YouTube video.....is there any nicer expert anywhere ?

See what I told you, RL, diversions, lies, tangents, the lad is incapable of addressing anything that is put in front of him.

A YouTube video of John Stockwell;

John Stockwell is the highest-ranking CIA official ever to leave the agency and go public. He ran a CIA intelligence-gathering post in Vietnam, was the task-force commander of the CIA's secret war in Angola in 1975 and 1976, and was awarded the Medal of Merit before he resigned. Stockwell's book In Search of Enemies, published by W.W. Norton 1978, is an international best-seller.

1 Reply

@Ionus,

Quote:

And if you were fluent in English you would avoid them .

Really, do you mean writers like Shakespeare, W Somerset Maughn

Quote:

How can you be so stupid as to admit there are inaccurate ways to write therefore it is good English ??

It isn't a question of inaccurate. Non-specific doesn't mean inaccurate.

'more' is nonspecific, yet you think it's okay to use it but big W writer's "rule" is when you use another word that explains more than more, it's bad English.

You don't have to explain to us why you don't understand this for you are, with your continued and growing idiocy, making it readily apparent.

PLease provide a short list of big W's writer's nonspecific words that fluent people should avoid or can I find it on the internet.

You still haven't been able to come up with a source for your arrant nonsense. Why do you think [and in your case I use that word lightly] that is?

0 Replies

@Ionus,

?

Quote:

And if you were fluent in English you would avoid them .

Really, do you mean writers like Shakespeare, W Somerset Maughn

Quote:

How can you be so stupid as to admit there are inaccurate ways to write therefore it is good English ??

It isn't a question of inaccurate. Non-specific doesn't mean inaccurate.

'more' is nonspecific, yet you think it's okay to use it but big W writer's "rule" is when you use another word that explains more than more, it's bad English.

You don't have to explain to us why you don't understand this for you are, with your continued and growing idiocy, making it readily apparent.

'most' is also nonspecific, as is bigger, smaller, some, sometimes, recently, lately, the list is endless. And your contention is that fluent people avoid these words?

Please provide a short list of big W writer's nonspecific words that fluent people should avoid or can I find it on the internet?

You still haven't been able to come up with a source for your arrant nonsense. Why do you think [and in your case I use that word lightly] that is?

2 Replies

@Ionus,

Quote:

The problem is you exaggerate everything beyond comprehension .

Given the arrant, and growing, stupidity that you are exhibiting with your mentally vacant "rules", I think I have been much too generous in describing you.

Quote:

you still haven't provided your source

Quote:

This shows your ignorance better than anything I could have said...you think the English language has one source ?

Yet even with specific language, 'your' is specific, Anus, you can't comprehend simple clear English. Nowhere did I suggest that English "has one source".

Is this a comprehension problem or one of your lies?

1 Reply

@Ionus,

Quote:
1) No, the idea that that, above, is your dumbest notion isn't quite accurate.
*2) No, the idea that above, is your dumbest notion isn't quite accurate.*
[* denotes ungrammatical for English. The second 'that' is necessary to make it grammatical][/quote]

Quote:

I(didn't reply, he chooses another one of his idiotic tangents)onus:

Of course you dont have the intelligence to write anything so it makes sense, so you are pleading it is bad English or nothing from you...I choose nothing from you .

See what I told you, RL. Even when you provide Ionus with a rebuttal that illustrates his idea is pure piffle, he either lies or avoids the issue with some ludicrous [increasingly so] tangent.

1 Reply

@Ionus,

Quote:

if your education had included the English language I wouldnt[sic] be explaining the basics of how to construct sentences .

Spendi kindly explained to you how mistaken you were and you, again, took a hard left to avoid engaging him. Why? Because you know that you are wrong and yet you have continued with a series of transparent lies.

Pretty sad, Ionus. Once a dumb grunt always a dumb grunt. And it's becoming increasingly apparent that you are also a dishonest dumb grunt, a racist, misogynistic, dishonest, dumb grunt.

1 Reply

@JTT,

Quote:

The notion of you making a reasoned case for anything is laughable in the extreme

We'll let others judge, shall we ? You might have bias like with your war crimes hysteria .

0 Replies

@JTT,

Quote:

A YouTube video of John Stockwell

So if someone from the CIA is in your camp they are to be trusted beyond credibility . But what if they say what you dont like ? What happens then ?

0 Replies

@JTT,

Quote:

Quote:
And if you were fluent in English you would avoid them .
Really, do you mean writers like Shakespeare, W Somerset Maughn

I knew you were border line psychotic, but really.....comparing your self to Shakespeare ???

0 Replies

Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know