@contrex,
You just proved my point with beautiful exactness. Thank you for that.
Think about what you just said: they've discovered that the "speed of gravity" is predicted to be exactly equal to the speed of light. What is the speed of light? It is the perceived maximum velocity of light and radiation -- energy -- within a vacuum.
This supports my theory that gravity is in fact a resultant force. "Gravitational damping," as you described it, depends on the speed of gravity -- and therefore light, if the aforementioned holds true. The quantum of light, the photon, is a massless particle with an infinite range; it travels, conveniently, at the speed of light -- and therefore the predicted speed of gravity. It also happens to be the force carrier for electromagnetism, making it a key component of my so-called "stoner nonsense."
"Gravitational radiation", then, could conceivably be another form of radioactive or nuclear radiation produced by photons -- in the realm of cosmic rays, gamma rays, beta rays, etc.
Compare it to CMBR if you'd like: whereas CMBR is stretched and diluted across the entirety of the universe, gravitational radiation would be a localized distortion caused by the magnetic pull of massive bodies.
In essence, what they are viewing is potential proof that there is a constant "pull" acting upon everything within earth's atmosphere and beyond -- gravity. It is not a force acting upon the planet -- it is the force of the planet's electromagnetic activity pulling everything within its range of influence towards it, diffused through the crust of the planet; without the thick crust and volume of water, the gravitational constant upon the earth's surface would crush us.
I'm not trying to tell you what
is, I just hope I might have decently described what
might be -- with greater evidence. In either case, I stand firm in my conclusion that gravity is not an independent force, but a resultant and mutual one.