20
   

Eliminate high school honors classes to increase diversity?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 06:06 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:
I am talking about teachers teaching all students with the same enthusiasm, diligence,
care, and high expectations that Honors classes receive
Can it be the difference between teaching students with powerful minds, who reek of success,
as distinct from others whose academic history shows them to be a bunch of losers ?





David
wmwcjr
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 07:31 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Hi, David. My older daughter is now in her second year of teaching math classes at a high school in the city where she currently resides. She's very smart and loves kids. On two separate occasions I've helped her grade test papers. I can tell you right now that many of these students DON'T EVEN TRY. Once during a test day, one of the students spoke out and said, "But I wasn't paying attention that day." My daughter's response was "Uh-huh." Laughing

As to the question that serves as the title of this topic, absolutely not.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 09:40 am
@wmwcjr,
wmwcjr wrote:
Hi, David.
Hi, Bill.



wmwcjr wrote:
My older daughter is now in her second year
of teaching math classes at a high school in the city
where she currently resides. She's very smart and loves kids.
On two separate occasions I've helped her grade test papers.
I can tell you right now that many of these students DON'T EVEN TRY.
About 30 years ago, I was chairman of the NY Mensa Scholarship Committee.
One of the applicants sent in his essay of maybe 20 words (to win the prize)
written in colored crayon on a ripped off piece of brown paper bag.




wmwcjr wrote:
Once during a test day, one of the students spoke out and said,
"But I wasn't paying attention that day." My daughter's response was "Uh-huh." Laughing
Once during trial a defense attorney (not me) succeeded on cross-examination in catching
Plaintiff in lies. He asked the Plaintiff the reason that he comes to Court and tell lies under oath.
He answered: "If I tell the truth, I won 't get the money."





David
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 09:56 am
@OmSigDAVID,
The plaintiff you described lacked both a knowledge of probable consequence, as well as a sense of responsibility. The two most immediately obvious probable consequences would be that he won, and was therefore stealing from the defendant; and, that he would lose, and suffer adversely himself (at the very least, having the expense of a failed suit). He also, apparently, lacked a sense of responsiblity, giving no thought to who might be hurt by his actions.

When i was in the army, i opened my foot locker in the barracks one day to get a clean pair of socks (keeping clean, dry socks on your feet is important). I then thought that i should wash my feet first, and, looking around, and seeing no one else there, i went into the latrine, and rinsed my feet off in the shower. Having dried them, i walked back into the bay where my bunk was, to catch this joker going through my foot locker. I asked him what the hell he thought he was doing--his reply was: "Hey man, i didn't know it was yours." I resopnded: "You knew it wasn't yours! Who the hell raised you?" He got pissed and asked if was talking about his mama. I said yes. He backed down.

He also lacked a consideration of the probable consequences--in this case, either that i would be robbed, or that he would be caught, and might suffer adverse consequences. And, of course, he lacked a sense of responsibility.

However, i don't think that it is the job of schools to teach children a sense of responsibility, and i even doubt that they can reasonably be required to teach the consideration of consequences, beyond teaching children how to think logically. Teachers do well to give students the lessons of the curriculum. Responsibility and consequences are things they must learn in the home.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 01:06 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
The plaintiff you described lacked both a knowledge of probable consequence,
as well as a sense of responsibility.
True; he confessed to perjury.





Setanta wrote:
The two most immediately obvious probable consequences would be that he won,
and was therefore stealing from the defendant;
Yes; he wanted the court to do that for him.
This was a bench trial; the judge was not inclined to believe Plaintiff's allegations,
underlying his theory of liability, after that confession.






Setanta wrote:
and, that he would lose, and suffer adversely himself (at the very least, having the expense of a failed suit).
He had a pro bono, charity lawyer.




Setanta wrote:
He also, apparently, lacked a sense of responsiblity, giving no thought to who might be hurt by his actions.
I don 't believe that he cared, except for himself.
I doubt that he 'd have said it, if he 'd known that he coud be criminally prosecuted for perjury. (He was not.)








Setanta wrote:
When i was in the army, i opened my foot locker in the barracks one day to get a clean pair of socks
(keeping clean, dry socks on your feet is important).
It IS.





Setanta wrote:
I then thought that i should wash my feet first, and, looking around, and seeing no one else there, i went into the latrine, and rinsed my feet off in the shower. Having dried them, i walked back into the bay where my bunk was, to catch this joker going through my foot locker. I asked him what the hell he thought he was doing--his reply was: "Hey man, i didn't know it was yours." I resopnded: "You knew it wasn't yours! Who the hell raised you?" He got pissed and asked if was talking about his mama. I said yes. He backed down.

He also lacked a consideration of the probable consequences--in this case, either that i would be robbed, or that he would be caught, and might suffer adverse consequences. And, of course, he lacked a sense of responsibility.
Such is the nature of thieves.







Setanta wrote:
However, i don't think that it is the job of schools to teach children a sense of responsibility, and i even doubt that they can reasonably be required to teach the consideration of consequences, beyond teaching children how to think logically. Teachers do well to give students the lessons of the curriculum. Responsibility and consequences are things they must learn in the home.
Agreed; or figure it out for themselves.





David
0 Replies
 
Oylok
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 01:41 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
David wrote:
Lash wrote:
I am talking about teachers teaching all students with the same enthusiasm, diligence, care, and high expectations that Honors classes receive

Can it be the difference between teaching students with powerful minds, who reek of success, as distinct from others whose academic history shows them to be a bunch of losers ?


In my brief experience as a Maths tutor in college, I always enjoyed teaching the quicker ones more (race and income had nothing to do with it). It was simply because they made my job easier, and success came more readily when I taught them. I like to see other people succeed, not fail. When my pupils succeed, I do.

However, I think that this partiality is something that good teachers need to be able to overcome.

Why?

Because often students' weaknesses in a subject are due freak accidents (like encounters with incompetent teachers or distractions in one's home life) that occurred at some earlier point in their educations. In Maths, if you aren't able to master Algebra 1 in the year you have to do so because some accident befalls you, then you are likely to have an even tougher time once you end up in Algebra 2, no? And the cavities within the student's confidence and knowledge base deepen as he or she moves up the scholastic ladder. You may wonder why schools allow people with such gaps in their understanding to advance at all, but the problem is that there are so many students struggling mathematically, that teachers, in the interests of self-preservation, let hordes of people through to the next level who should be held back.

It is because of this ripple effect that students with very powerful minds have academic histories which show them to be a "bunch of losers".
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 01:51 pm
@Oylok,
Oylok wrote:
(race and income had nothing to do with it).


Leaving aside that there is no such thing as race, i agree completely that skin color and ethnic origin have nothing to do with the capacity of a child to learn. However, i cannot at all agree that income has nothing to do with success in school. Students who come from poor families with few resources are working at a great disadvantage in comparison to those who come from affluent homes. This is true whether the family in question is "white" or "black," or of any other arbitrary description. This is especially true in comparing such a family to a family of the white, Protestant ascendancy. I used the term ascendancy earlier for the precise reason that families which have enjoyed generations of affluence have access to resources, and the knowledge and sophistication to use those resources, which are closed to poor families. Even when a family of the middle, and especially of the upper middle class is not "white," or Protestant, generations of affluence have effects which provide a significant advantage to the family's children in school. Even at a very basic level, children who are hungry, or chronically malnourished, are at a distinct disadvantage in school.
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 01:54 pm
@Setanta,
Quote:
Students who come from poor families with few resources are working at a great disadvantage in comparison to those who come from affluent homes.

Like being able to hire tutors, for instance.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:03 pm
@Setanta,
Quote:
However, i cannot at all agree that income has nothing to do with success in school. Students who come from poor families with few resources are working at a great disadvantage in comparison to those who come from affluent homes
the families that these kids come from matter, but it is not only because of the money, it is also due to the culture in the family. There is a correlation between income and success, but the determinant is not the money, it is due to the level of importance that the family places upon education. We have seen poor Asian kids do far better at education success then others in their income group, they even do on par with wealthy whites, because in their family education success is not a dream, it is a requirement. These kids even succeed in crappy inner city schools where everyone else claims to poor schools for education failure. These asian kids are told by their parents that a bad school is not excuse, that they need to figure out a way to get to college in spite of the quality of the school, and they largely do just that.

Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:05 pm
@hawkeye10,
Apart from the silliness of lumping all people from Asia into a single group and talking about culture, your comments ignore that it takes affluence to provide access to the artifacts of culture which provide the advantage. I consider you a racist, though, so your comments about "culture" don't surprise me. My remarks were not about "poor" schools, they concerned poor families. Your claims are not convincing.
Oylok
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:11 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
Oylok wrote:
(race and income had nothing to do with it)
However, i cannot at all agree that income has nothing to do with success in school. Students who come from poor families with few resources are working at a great disadvantage in comparison to those who come from affluent homes.


High SES means more family support during those rough patches. It means a great deal to student's chances of success.

All I meant was that when the richer students came to me for tutoring, I had no idea how much income they or their families made, so I was not conscious of enjoying my work with them more on account of their wealth.

But if what you're saying is that I unconsciously enjoyed working with the richer ones because those were the ones who had had more prior success and thus picked up the material faster, you may be right. That may well have happened. Good teachers must overcome that partiality, and I certainly tried to give the stragglers as much support as I gave the high-achievers.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:14 pm
@Oylok,
I was speaking to the general principle, and not your personal experience. I can't really know, of course, if what you say is true, but i suspect it would be.
0 Replies
 
Oylok
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:16 pm
@boomerang,
boomerang wrote:
Like being able to hire tutors, for instance.


Tutoring at my school was free. But in general you're right. Please read my reply to Setanta if you want to know what I meant be "race and income had nothing to do with it" (or whatever my exact words were).
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:17 pm
@Oylok,
Quote:
But if what you're saying is that I unconsciously enjoyed working with the richer ones because those were the ones who had had more prior success and thus picked up the material faster, you may be right. That may well have happened. Good teachers must overcome that partiality, and I certainly tried to give the stragglers as much support as I gave the high-achievers.
the motivation level of the students can not help but to greatly effect the motivation level of the teachers. It makes a great deal of difference to how the teacher performs if her students come from Asian families where the parents have instructed the kids that failure in school is not an option as apposed to iner city black kids where the kids have been taught that the schools suck and they are being cheated out of a quality education.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:22 pm
By the way, the city i live in right now has a huge population of people from Asia--i believe it has the largest Chinese population of any city in North America, but i won't insist on that. It also has a large population of Afghans, Persians, Pakistanis, Indians, Arabs, Russians, Koreans, Japanese, Vietnamese; in short, people from all over Asia. Obviouisly, it is errant idiocy to suggest that there is any such thing as a single Asian culture. There are students from these ethnically Asian communities who excel, students who get by, and students who drop out. There are students from these communities who join youth groups and youth orchestras and participate in sports and musical groups; and, there are students from these communities who join street gangs and shoot each other down.

Even if one alleges that i can't prove my contention about affluence and academic success, it is little short of idiocy to talk about an Asian culture and pontificate on the attitude to education in this chimerical, monolithic culture. Tell me, Hawkeye, how do you know that the adults in these families tell their children? Do you go from house to house to demand that you be made privy to their lectures to their children?
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:26 pm
@boomerang,
Unless one is familiar with how poor people live, i don't think one can understand the disadvantages under which they labor. It's nice to think of all the great books you can get from the public library, but what good does that do you if the library is miles away, no one in the family has car to drive you there, and you don't have bus fare? Many such families are doing well just to keep their chilren fed, never mind the quality of the food they get. I've lived and worked in poor neighborhoods. It's just appalling to compare, for example, the prices in a grocery store in a poor neighborhood to those in middle class neighborhoods--where the prices are much lower.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:29 pm
I once worked in a poor neighborhood in Columbus, Ohio, in a shopping center which had a Kroger store. Once or twice, i bought food there, but then i stopped. I could go to the Kroger store on Northwest Boulevard in the affluent Upper Arlington neighborhood, and save money even factoring the gas to drive there. Gasoline was cheaper in Upper Arlington than it was on the north side of Columbus, too.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:30 pm
@Setanta,
Quote:
Tell me, Hawkeye, how do you know that the adults in these families tell their children? Do you go from house to house to demand that you be made privy to their lectures to their children?
first person accounts, as well as studies that speak of the differing level of importance put on education by differing subcultures. Here is a first person for you

Quote:
In some of our cultures, the value of education comes from a Confucian heritage, which puts scholars at the top of the social hierarchy and reveres teachers. Confucius’ birthday is celebrated on September 28 in Taiwan with a national holiday called Teachers’ Day, with ceremonies, dances, and presents for teachers. Confucius is revered as the first teacher, one who advocated education for all—a radical concept in his time.

In many of our families, education is valued because our parents are educated themselves. Many Asian immigrants first come to America for graduate education and so hold advanced degrees; others would not have been allowed into America without their advanced degrees or medical training. Because of language difficulties, it was easier for those trained in math, science, computers, and medicine to succeed here.

Ah, I see the beginnings of the model minority myth…

In many other families, education is seen as a way out of the hard work and poverty whence spring the parents, or as a means of providing better lives for their children. We’ve all heard stories of parents sacrificing everything to send their children to the best schools. My dad was so impressed by a Japanese-American neighbor who worked in a nursery all his life and still drives a rusty old pick-up truck while his three daughters attended private schools and drove Mercedes Benzes.

But I never really thought about the lengths I would go to in the name of education until I had my own children.

All of a sudden all I could see were cartoon heroes who were average or underachieving students—Bart Simpson, Recess, even Arthur. I was horrified by conversations with Caucasian American parents who wanted to hold their children back a grade because their birthday was just before the cutoff (whereas I was trying to find a way to push my daughter a grade ahead because her birthday was just after the cutoff), who criticized other parents for teaching their kindergartners multiplication (whereas I was impressed and inspired), or who said things like, "They need to have a life" (they are children—learning new things is their life). I became concerned that my children might feel ashamed of being bright or that I would have to hide my ambition for them. I felt like I have to be on guard against American culture’s devaluing of education.

Not that I would want a totally Asian education either, which emphasizes rote memorization and conformity. I want them to learn art and music, leadership and creativity, to ask questions and to think outside of the box, but I want them to have a firm foundation in math and science, too. I want them to have the best of both approaches to education, but not so much in terms of content as attitude. I do not want them to be satisfied with passing, but to always strive for excellence.

When we were house-hunting, I researched all the schools first, public and private. I knew all the test scores, the ethnic breakdowns, the test scores by ethnic breakdown, stories and rumors about the teachers and the atmosphere. I finally decided on the school that had both the highest test scores and the highest concentration of Asian-American children—30 percent, as opposed to the city’s average 9 percent. On the one hand, I feel it is important for my kids to grow up surrounded by other Asian Americans so they do not feel like minorities (or freaks). But as an added benefit, I figured that since most Asian-American parents in my town are immigrants who first came here for graduate school, most of them are going to be pushing their kids hard, especially in math and science. Those are the friends I want my kids to have.

I was a little embarrassed about being so hard core, until I talked to other Asian-American parents and discovered that I was not alone. Many Asian Americans try to buy homes in this area, and if they cannot afford a house, then they move into an apartment. I do not know if I would go that far. But one friend of mine just moved out of a new 2000 square foot, 4 bedroom tract home, and into University of Michigan family housing just so that her children could go to a slightly better public school.

In California, Asian Americans are also concentrated by good school districts: Cupertino, Saratoga, Monterey Park are all at least 50 percent APA. Asian shopping malls sprout up in the surrounding area, after-school tutoring centers are de rigueur, and housing prices rise exponentially.

I start salivating at the thought of it and try to figure out how I could possibly afford to buy a house in those incredibly expensive areas. But then I hear stories about how some Caucasian parents are moving out of those school districts because they feel the Asian-American kids are pushing the curve up too high and their children cannot compete.

Moving away because a school is too good? That sounds almost as crazy, as alien to me as paying a child for a C on her report card.

There is some huge culture gap here that I am just not getting.

Even as I write I am aware of the many generalizations, the spoken and unspoken stereotypes, lurking beneath this surface. I am aware that in speaking of education as an "Asian family value," I risk appearing to imply that rigorous educational attainment could not also be an African-American, Hispanic-American, Greek-American, Native American, or Irish-American family value as well.

While this is not my intention, I also want to stake a claim for Asian-American education values as being a special if not unique legacy of our Asian heritages. Claiming this at a time of deep teacher shortages and poor public school performance in a country that can be rabidly anti-intellectual is worthy, perhaps necessary.

In the strict sense of maximizing our education, the "Model Minority" may be one stereotype that we—and Americans of any ethnicity—should not only accept, but might do well to embrace
http://www.imdiversity.com/villages/asian/education_academia_study/wang_education_culture_gap.asp
Oylok
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:31 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
the motivation level of the students can not help but to greatly effect the motivation level of the teachers. It makes a great deal of difference to how the teacher performs if her students come from Asian families where the parents have instructed the kids that failure in school is not an option as apposed to iner city black kids where the kids have been taught that the schools suck and they are being cheated out of a quality education.


I have seen some teachers break through those motivational barriers. Usually they are fanatical Christian types who are determined to chase after that 100th sheep like the fate of the world is at stake. Their eyes seem to glow with a divine light.

As it happens, the two or or three black students I saw were all very motivated to succeed. Blacks had a tradition of succeeding where I went to school. There were no inner cities nearby.
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Nov, 2010 02:35 pm
@hawkeye10,
So, then, you're saying that Afghans, Persians, Punjabis, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Indians, Sinhalese, Tamils, Burmese, Cambodians, Laotians and Vietnamese are motivated by a "Confucian heritage?" How does this song and dance explain Chinese kids in street gangs in Toronto doing drive-by shootings?

In case you need to have it explained to you, your "first person" is anecdotal evidence.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Kid wouldn't fight, died of injuries - Discussion by gungasnake
Public school zero tolerance policies. - Question by boomerang
Dismantling the DC voucher program - Discussion by gungasnake
Adventures in Special Education - Discussion by littlek
home schooling - Discussion by dancerdoll
Can I get into an Ivy League? - Question by the-lazy-snail
Let's start an education forum - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Educational resources on the cheap - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 12:31:45