0
   

Wi-fi and health

Forums: Science, Technology, Biology
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Cyracuz
 
Reply Wed 24 Nov, 2010 08:32 am
Are all the wireless signals we send through the air these days damaging to bilology?

This study seems to say that they are damaging to trees in areas where there is alot of wi-fi activity.

If we can show a connection between the deteriorating health of trees and these signals, can we expect that they have a similar effect on us?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,092 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Nov, 2010 09:52 am
@Cyracuz,
Cyracuz wrote:
Are all the wireless signals we send through the air these days damaging to bilology?

In the scheme of things, No. Cosmic rays cause more known damage than all of our radio EM activity combined.
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Nov, 2010 10:21 am
@rosborne979,
Yes, I hadn't thought about that, but it makes sense.

I was thinking along the lines of resilience. Some lifeforms are more resilient than others, and while trees may take damage from wireless signals, humans may be more resilient.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

U.S. Lags World in Grasp of Genetics and Acceptance of Evolution - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion? - Discussion by wandeljw
New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
New species of hominid discovered - Question by FBM
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
More (much more) dinosaur soft tissue turning up - Discussion by gungasnake
Must Scientific Knowledge Be Considered Relative? - Discussion by wandeljw
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Wi-fi and health
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 10:13:57
▲ ▼