@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
Quote:They don't have to reformulate anything. Heck, they could drop the price of the happy meal and just sell the toys separately. You really don't seem to know what you are talking about here.
Even if the law allowed for parents to upcharge and get the toy in the happy meal, which it does not because the toy is not allowed to be in the same package as the happy meal, this is still none of the governments concern.
It absolutely is the government's concern. I'm not concerned with your resistance to the idea in the slightest, because it's born of uninformed indignation and not a sober examination of the costs society bears from obesity.
Who gives a **** if the toy is IN THE BOX or not? Sell the happy meal for 50 cents cheaper. Sell the toy for an additional 50 cents if you like. Hand the toy to the parent when you hand them their food. Nobody's rights are being trampled on here....
I'm surprised you don't argue for commercials full of sexy ladies showing how cool it is to smoke Camels, all over tv - especially kids TV. After all, if the gov't has no interest in anyone's health, and can't regulate advertising, then you would certainly support such things. Right?
Cycloptichorn