The rules of engagement

What is proper conduct in a discussion of philosophic issues? I don't know if there is a simple answer, but here are a few basic pointers, since my experiences on a2k recently indicate that this is very neccesary.

So when you are criticizing some ideas someone posted there are a few mistakes you can make that will render all your efforts useless. Keep reading if you do not wish to fall into this trap.

First and foremost, stick to the topic. Make sure you understand what is said before you start ridiculing it. If something is unclear, ask for a clarification.

Secondly, don't think you are smarter than everyone else. Opinions about the poster's mental condition or his reasoning skills are not relevant to any discussion, and if you offer only such opinions you are not contributing to the discussion in any meaningful way.

Thirdly, if you disagree with an opinion, a way of reasoning or a truth presented, your disagreement is not poof of fallability. Many people seem to think that it is though, and are quick to point out how wrong you are without offering an explanation of their opinions. However, if you do not present an alternative, or if you do not explain your objection according to criteria that are acceptable to all who are involved, you are making fruitful discussion impossible.

And to end this rant: If you log on to a2k with the mindset that you already know everything there is to know, and if you will never admit that your understanding may fall short of someone elses', you have effectively barred yourself from the eventuality that you may learn something new. If you enter like this, you are more similar to a drunken loudmouth in a bar than an inquisitive individual who wants to discuss and explore philosophic issues.

Speaking from years of experience, a2k is a great place to come to get new inputs, new ideas, and good discussion. But only if you respect the "rules of engagement".