@Cyracuz,
Cyracuz wrote:
Truth is a human invention, relevant only within human relations with eachother and the world we percieve.
I agree if your stating that for personal truth and perceived truth. By stating only that however, it seems as if you are denying any possibility of an absolute truth. If you are, then how could anything be false. The only way something can be false is if there's a truth to compare it to. If there's no real truth which makes it so there's nothing false, then how can there be conflicting ideas that are both true? The only way I can see this logic making any sense to me would be if you taking a metaphysical solipsism approach on this.
Truth as the human invention is just a term used to try and convey a meaning of what we believe to exist. In a close-minded world, everyone is correct in what they believe. There are, however, conflicting ideas. If there are conflicting idea's, then how could both be right? Wouldn't one be right and one be wrong, regardless of whether we know which is what? I'm afraid that I don't really see the logic in that...unless you plan on trying to say that individuals live in separate, parallel universes with their own laws of logic and their own truths . . . I'm not prepared to go there ;-)