1
   

Wal-Mart signifies all that is wrong in America

 
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jul, 2004 04:59 pm
The worship and greed for money makes the world cockeyed. If your are talented and dedicated to something and you end up making a lot of money doing it, that is ideal. I realize not all of us can have the ideal and have to work at jobs we are not really happy in. There are more people who love their work than you would possibly imagine but then if you've intereview everyone on Earth and know they are all unhappy with their jobs, I guess you're right. I guess they must be the people who love and worship at the alter of WalMart and feel that it's necessary to defend the indefensible. Souls are available behind the Shoe Department.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2004 12:58 pm
Thought it a good idea to bring this forum back from the 'dead.' Wink
***************************
Wal-Mars Invades Earth
July 25, 2004
By BARBARA EHRENREICH

It's torn cities apart from Inglewood to Chicago and
engulfed the entire state of Vermont. Now the conflict's
gone national as a presidential campaign issue, with John
Kerry hammering the megaretailer for its abysmally low
wages and Dick Cheney praising it for its "spirit of
enterprise, fair dealing and integrity." This could be the
central battle of the 21st century: Earth people versus the
Wal-Martians.

No one knows exactly when the pod landed on our planet, but
it seemed normal enough during its early years of gentle
expansion. Almost too normal, if you thought about it, with
those smiley faces and red-white-and-blue bunting, like the
space invaders in a 1950's sci-fi flick when they put on
their human suits.

Then it began to grow. By 2000, measures of mere size -
bigger than General Motors! richer than Switzerland! - no
longer told the whole story. It's the velocity of growth
that you need to measure now: two new stores opening and $1
billion worth of U.S. real estate bought up every week;
almost 600,000 American employees churned through in a year
(that's at a 44 percent turnover rate). My thumbnail
calculation suggests that by the year 4004, every square
inch of the United States will be covered by supercenters,
so that the only place for new supercenters will be on top
of existing ones.

Wal-Mart will be in trouble long before that, of course,
because with everyone on the planet working for the company
or its suppliers, hardly anyone will be able to shop there.
Wal-Mart is frequently lauded for bringing consumerism to
the masses, but more than half of its own "associates," as
the employees are euphemistically termed, cannot afford the
company's health insurance, never mind its Faded Glory
jeans. With hourly wages declining throughout the economy,
Wal-Mart - the nation's largest employer - is already
seeing its sales go soft.

In my own brief stint at the company in 2000, I worked with
a woman for whom a $7 Wal-Mart polo shirt, of the kind we
had been ordered to wear, was an impossible dream: It took
us an hour to earn that much. Some stores encourage their
employees to apply for food stamps and welfare; many take
second jobs. Critics point out that Wal-Mart has consumed
$1 billion in public subsidies, but that doesn't count the
government expenditures required to keep its associates
alive. Apparently the Wal-Martians, before landing, failed
to check on the biological requirements for human life.

But a creature afflicted with the appetite of a starved
hyena doesn't have time for niceties. Wal-Mart is facing
class-action suits for sex discrimination and nonpayment
for overtime work (meaning no payment at all), as well as
accusations that employees have been locked into stores
overnight, unable to get help even in medical emergencies.
These are the kinds of conditions we associate with third
world sweatshops, and in fact Wal-Mart fails at least five
out of 10 criteria set by the Worker Rights Consortium,
which monitors universities' sources of logoed apparel -
making it the world's largest sweatshop.

Confronted with its crimes, the folks at the Bentonville
headquarters whimper that the company has gotten too
"decentralized" - meaning out of control - which has to be
interpreted as a cry for help. But who is prepared to step
forward and show Wal-Mart how to coexist with the people of
its chosen planet? Certainly not the enablers, like George
Will and National Review's Jay Nordlinger, who smear the
company's critics as a "liberal intelligentsia" that favors
Williams-Sonoma. (Disclosure: I prefer Costco, which pays
decent wages, insures 90 percent of its employees and is
reputedly run by native-born humans.)

No, Wal-Mart's only hope lies with its ostensible
opponents, like Madeline Janis-Aparicio, who led the
successful fight against a new superstore in Inglewood,
Calif. "The point is not to destroy them," she told me,
"but to make them accountable." Similarly Andy Stern,
president of the Service Employees International Union,
will soon begin a national effort to "bring Wal-Mart up to
standards we can live with." He envisions a nationwide
movement bringing together the unions, churches, community
organizations and environmentalists who are already
standing up to the company's recklessly metastatic growth.

Earth to Wal-Mars, or wherever you come from: Live with us
or go back to the mother ship.

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

If the author's name doesn't sound familiar, see: http://www.pbs.org/now/printable/transcript_ehrenreich_print.html
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2004 02:55 pm
Ehrenreich has been on a tear against Wal-Mart since she worked for them as an "associate" for several months doing research for her book Nickel and Dimed (Holt 2001) and found just how badly they treated their employees.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2004 05:23 pm
I read "Nickel and Dimed" several years ago. It isn't only Wal-Mart that treats their employees badly - unfortunately.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2004 02:09 am
Ehrenreich is an articulate and interesting writer as long as she sticks to reporting what she sees with her own eyes. I greatly appreciated "Nickel and Dimed" for its participant-observer perspective on the life of unskilled workers. Unfortunately, she doesn't stick to what she's good at and tries to get at the big picture too. And this part doesn't work for her because thinking systematically is a weakness of hers.

"My thumbnail calculation suggests that by the year 4004, every square inch of the United States will be covered by supercenters, so that the only place for new supercenters will be on top of existing ones. "

"Wal-Mart will be in trouble long before that, of course, because with everyone on the planet working for the company or its suppliers, hardly anyone will be able to shop there. "

Quotes like this create the appearance of original and profound thinking, but she is really just repeating century-old economic fallacies. And why is a $7 polo shirt an "impossible dream" for someone on a wage of $7/hour? Am I really the only one who actually owns shirts as expensive as my hourly wage?

Barbara Ehrenreich is an engaging, interesting and intelligent writer. I'd say she's worth about ten Michael Moores. This makes her confident but foolish statements about economic and sociological theory all the more disheartening.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2004 02:05 pm
I was on vacation and ran out of memory on my digital camera. Having forgotten the propietary USB cable and thus unable to download the pics to any available computer, I made a trip to Wal-Mart and created a Photo CD from the SM media card to the tune of $3.84. You gotta love it.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 12:05 pm
Wal-Mart workers foil scam
They call police when elderly woman tries to wire $25,000

By ANNE SAKER, Staff Writer

The elderly woman walked into the Kinston Wal-Mart on Tuesday afternoon a week ago and asked to send some money to Canada.

Lakeisha Washington, 23, working at the wire-transfer counter, gave the woman the usual form to fill out. But when Washington got the form back, she stared at what the woman had written on the bottom line.

$25,000.

Wire transfers could not exceed $10,000. Washington called out to customer service manager Catina Gooding, 22, and gave her the paperwork. Gooding studied it. She had never seen a number that size on a money-transfer form. She asked the elderly woman, "What are you sending this money for?"

"They told me I would have to send the money to get my prize delivered," the woman said.

That answer puzzled Gooding. "Did you enter a drawing?"

The woman said no. But she volunteered, "I went and cleared out my whole bank account."

"Right then," Gooding said, "we knew something was up," and the police were summoned.

The woman had been enticed to surrender virtually all of her life savings by a notorious fraud operation out of Canada: A caller announces that the victim has won the Canadian lottery, but before the jackpot can be awarded, the "winner" must send money for taxes or import duties.

North Carolina and federal authorities have long warned people against that scam and others like it, which has bilked them of millions of dollars. Attorney General Roy Cooper said Wednesday that last year alone, his office received 400 complaints about telemarketing deceits -- usually after the victim has sent the money.

"We think the actual number of victims is much higher," Cooper said. "We think they are underreported. And the amounts taken can range from a few hundred dollars per victim to thousands of dollars."

While the Kinston police were on the way, the elderly woman told Gooding she had received a phone call earlier in the day from someone who shared the woman's last name and instructed her to send the money.

Kinston police Detective Ray Petrusch knew of the con because in December, another Kinston woman lost $4,500 in the same way. He asked the elderly woman in Wal-Mart about the lottery. "At first, she didn't believe me that it was a scam," he said. "She was adamant that it was legitimate."

The woman gave Petrusch a telephone number in Canada. Petrusch dialed the number, the call was answered, and when Petrusch introduced himself, the line went dead. The detective's subsequent calls were picked up by a phone machine. Cooper said the Department of Justice is working with Canadian officials to investigate.

Petrusch would not release the elderly woman's name but said her husband had died a few years ago, and she has no children or other family around.

He took her to her bank in Kinston, where apparently no one had asked why she was withdrawing her nest egg. Petrusch explained the situation to the manager, who promised to keep an eye on the elderly woman.

Gooding said she and Washington received congratulations and thanks from co-workers and customers.

Then they went back to work.

link
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 01:21 pm
Cute McG, although I'm starting to think that GREED, yes G-R-E-E-D, is what's making these boiler rooms so successful at fleecing our elderly and less cautious citizens. And GREED is what's driving Wal-Mart to abuse its unskilled labour. Not that greed is bad mind you...as Gordon Gekko said:"Greed is GOOD"
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 04:36 pm
Greed is good. It depends on how one uses greed that is important.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 08:41 am
It's not just greed alone, it's the predatory nature of greed. Stomping on anyone in one's path and leaving behind a bloody trail in the pursuit and lust for money is not a good human character trait.

As far as the failed con job, that's a stupid crook story and any store would have become immediately suspicious.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2004 09:07 pm
That's just sour grapes LW.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2004 09:01 am
Yes, I do detect a lot of sour grapes in your posts.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2004 11:11 am
Hey! Look what you did! You took what I said and reversed it so it looked like I was referring to my own post! Very clever, LW! Laughing
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2004 01:40 pm
I like you better now that you're doing organic drugs McG.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2004 01:18 pm
Laughing Yes, those non-organic are full of chemicals!
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2004 10:47 am
I hate Wal-Mart. They claim to be in it for the average person when all they do is put up Supercenters every couple of blocks, put the "average person" out of business and force them to support the very company that put them out of business. It is like the old miner towns. They offer 10% to their employees so that they give back what little money they made in the first place with nothing left over to save. They also put the business they do business with in bad positions (http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/77/walmart.html). very intersting article.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2004 10:54 am
I'm very curious to see what the fall-out from this is going to be.

Quote:
The United Food and Commercial Workers union has won the right to certify employees at a Wal-Mart in Jonquiere, Quebec.


link
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2004 12:31 pm
How else are they going to keep prices low?

Quote:
California paid an estimated $86 million in pubic assistance in 2001 because workers at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. earn such low wages, researchers said on Tuesday.

"Wal-Mart workers' reliance on public assistance due to substandard wages and benefits has become a form of indirect public subsidy to the company," said the report.

The report said many of Wal-Mart's 44,000 California employees in 2001 relied on food stamps, Medicare and subsidized housing to make ends meet and also need more public health care than typical retail workers.


Wal-Mart Costs California
0 Replies
 
shepaints
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2004 12:48 pm
I see that Walmart is planning to move next
to a 600 acre religious retreat somewhere here in Ontario. Not surprisingly, there is a conflict between Walmart and the retreat administrators. Apparently they will not be placated by promises
of berms etc. to cut down on potential noise, traffic.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2004 02:40 pm
Maybe the price cutting floating head will become their new deity.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 02:12:45