@Setanta,
Absolute crap, but this is Setanta.
As a quick, but important aside, I still think that you are a lying, whining piece of crap, Setanta. Don't you see how childish you are. [rhetorical question] You attempt to discuss with none of the facts. But that has never bothered you before so why let it do so now.
Quote:As HS pointed out, these things can be solved by fact-checking. This Wikipedia article lists the Republic of Vietnam as a "Dialog Partner" of SEATO.
Lame lame lame lame lame, you donkey! You doesn't even bother to quote from YOUR "fact checking" article. Read the whole article, you silly goof. After you made a complete ass of yourself in your first attempt, it must have taken ehBeth hours to get those feet out of your mouth, in they go again.
Quote:
Despite being intended to provide a collective, anti-communist shield to Southeast Asia, SEATO was unable to intervene in the conflicts in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam because an intervention required a decision of unanimity, which was never reached; France and the Philippines objected. Intervention in the Vietnam conflict was sought again later, but France and Pakistan withheld support.
Again, the USA has no god damn business committing terrorist, illegal, immoral actions to try to force the people of any country to do what they don't want to do.
When are y'all going to get that thru your thick skulls? When are y'all going to convey that to your governments?
Quote:That does not alter, however, the right of the government of the RV to accept U.S. military aid and troops. If one argues against the legitimacy of the government of the RV, the same arguments can be advanced against the DRV.
It most certainly does. The RV was a puppet government, just like all the puppet governments the US has set up over the last, roughly a century.
Quote:Because of the 1954 Accords settling the First Indochina War, South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos were not SEATO members. The United States sought, but failed, to make the Vietnam War into a SEATO collective defense problem.
The US prosecuted this huge unjust invasion against Vietnam even when they couldn't get their mendaciously orchestrated "SEATO" to go along.
Quote:This is why i described the entire affair as tragic, with no good guys on any side of the conflict.
You probably describe it this way, Setanta, to salve your guilty conscience. If you were half the historian that you think you are, you would have known that the US was, by that time, guilty of numerous invasions of sovereign nations.
The US was guilty of numerous atrocities against the people of those nations.
The US was never involved in any of those illegal invasions to help the citizenry, it was always involved to help itself to the wealth and resources of those countries.
Quote:They invaded the sovereign nation for which JTT sheds his crocodile tears.
You keep repeating this unmitigated crap like it has any veracity. The people who went into the area that was "known" as South Vietnam were all VIETNAMESE. These were people who were struggling to get the vicious hoard, the US and its troops out of
THEIR COUNTRY!
Repeating your silly nonsense will never relieve you of the brutality that you took part in. How active you were and to what degree you participated is for you to reflect upon.
Quote:Now, one can argue that Ngo Dinh Diem was not an elected representative of the Vietnamese in the Republic of Vietnam, but Ho Chi Minh was no more a elected representative of the people of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam
The people of Vietnam had every right to elect who they wanted. Eisenhower figured it was 80% in favor of Ho Chi Minh. There were elections set to happen but they were nixed because the US wasn't going to get its way.
Is this scummy behavior or what?
The USA did the same thing that it has done numerous times and continues to do to this day, ie. engage in clear terrorist actions, [yes, Cycloptichorn, the US is a terrorist nation, BIG TIME] meant to defeat the choice of the people and install their own brutal dictator.
Ho Chi Minh petitioned Truman a number of times asking the US to support their drive for independence. It is the height of hypocrisy that the US didn't. Instead they supported France to gain France's support in Europe. Duplicity much!
The people who participated in the Vietnam debacle are war criminals. Obviously some are more so, some much more so than others.
People who sit in the get away car of a bank robbery, or people who provide support for criminals are, justifiably, guilty also.
If this was a just world, if every country was treated in the same manner, there would be a large number of American war criminals doing time.
It isn't a just world, we all know that, but that doesn't make it right and moral for the top gangster nation to have play its games with the innocents of the world. This makes a complete mockery of supposed US ideals.
Doesn't it make anyone angry the degree to which you've been misled, the degree to which your government and your troops have been involved in illegal actions against innocent people ?