0
   

Evolution debunked

 
 
Carico
 
Reply Sun 26 Jul, 2009 04:41 am
As I explained, since Darwin couldn't describe his main characters (the common ancestors) then his story never started at all. That's because since Darwin didn't know what or who man supposedly evolved from, then the story of evolution is nothing more than people going round and round in circles in their minds like a dog chasing its tail just to end right back up where they started from; "What's the origin of man?" :what:

Nobody knows because no one can know a character that an author never described in the first place. Wink

So the story of evolution has been a complete and total waste of time since it originated in the minds of men and is still happening in the imaginations of men with no conclusion since Darwin never described his main characters to begin with. :rollinglaugh: So they're as imaginary as each individual imagination. Thus the story of evolution is nothing but a fairy tale and a badly written one since it has no conclusion. Laughing
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,085 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jul, 2009 05:10 am
@Carico,
Carico;66901 wrote:
As I explained, since Darwin couldn't describe his main characters (the common ancestors) then his story never started at all. That's because since Darwin didn't know what or who man supposedly evolved from, then the story of evolution is nothing more than people going round and round in circles in their minds like a dog chasing its tail just to end right back up where they started from; "What's the origin of man?" :what:

Nobody knows because no one can know a character that an author never described in the first place. Wink

So the story of evolution has been a complete and total waste of time since it originated in the minds of men and is still happening in the imaginations of men with no conclusion since Darwin never described his main characters to begin with. :rollinglaugh: So they're as imaginary as each individual imagination. Thus the story of evolution is nothing but a fairy tale and a badly written one since it has no conclusion. Laughing


It "has no conclusion" because it hasn't stopped. New species are observed constantly.

Ever heard of CCR5delta32? Know how that came about?

You're easy to handle.
Carico
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jul, 2009 05:16 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;66904 wrote:
It "has no conclusion" because it hasn't stopped. New species are observed constantly.

Ever heard of CCR5delta32? Know how that came about?

You're easy to handle.


You're correct. People are still engaging in fantasy to figure out the end of the story as I said in previous posts; Darwin left it to his readers to finish his story since he himself coudn't describe his main characters then of course he couldn't bring it to a conclusion either. Wink

And since his readers have been doing that for over 150 years, then even his readers know that his story isn't logical. Wink Nevertheless, Satan wants people to deny God so badly, that he entices people to hang onto myths, even incomplete myths long after they've been proven to be lies. Wink
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jul, 2009 06:01 am
@Carico,
Carico;66907 wrote:
You're correct. People are still engaging in fantasy to figure out the end of the story as I said in previous posts; Darwin left it to his readers to finish his story since he himself coudn't describe his main characters then of course he couldn't bring it to a conclusion either. Wink

And since his readers have been doing that for over 150 years, then even his readers know that his story isn't logical. Wink Nevertheless, Satan wants people to deny God so badly, that he entices people to hang onto myths, even incomplete myths long after they've been proven to be lies. Wink


Again, explain the CCR5delta32 mutation.
Carico
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jul, 2009 07:26 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;66914 wrote:
Again, explain the CCR5delta32 mutation.


First of all, finding a gene or a cell that can arrest a virus doesn't mean that that gene mutated. No one can know if a gene mutated unless someone saw it doing.so. So if some genes are present inside one human and not another, that in no way proves that that's the same gene that mutated from another gene.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2009 02:30 am
@Carico,
Carico;66901 wrote:
As I explained, since Darwin couldn't describe his main characters (the common ancestors) then his story never started at all. That's because since Darwin didn't know what or who man supposedly evolved from, then the story of evolution is nothing more than people going round and round in circles in their minds like a dog chasing its tail just to end right back up where they started from; "What's the origin of man?" :what:

Nobody knows because no one can know a character that an author never described in the first place. Wink

http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect20/human_evolution.jpg

http://mbscientific.com/mediawiki/mediawiki-1.11.1/images/HominidToMan.GIF
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Jul, 2009 08:51 pm
@Carico,
Carico;66918 wrote:
First of all, finding a gene or a cell that can arrest a virus doesn't mean that that gene mutated. No one can know if a gene mutated unless someone saw it doing.so. So if some genes are present inside one human and not another, that in no way proves that that's the same gene that mutated from another gene.


You again show your lack of knowledge.

CCR5delta32 isn't a gene. CCR5 is a gene. CCR5delta32 is the CCR5 gene with a hunk missing, hence delta (definition: deleted) 32 (length of deletion). It is a mutation of the CCR5 gene.

The hunk in particular is responsible for producing receptors on T-cells. Without this, the T-cells in your body (imagine this) don't have those particular receptors. HIV requires these to bind to the cell. It doesn't "arrest" a virus... it in no way attacks the virus. The virus simply cannot bind to the mutated cells.

We tested this recently. It removed an HIV infection from the patient.

You missed again. We have pinpointed the mutation, what it does, how to use it and where it came from.

This is evolutionary biology.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jul, 2009 08:33 am
@Carico,
Carico;66901 wrote:
As I explained, since Darwin couldn't describe his main characters (the common ancestors) then his story never started at all. That's because since Darwin didn't know what or who man supposedly evolved from, then the story of evolution is nothing more than people going round and round in circles in their minds like a dog chasing its tail just to end right back up where they started from; "What's the origin of man?" :what:

Nobody knows because no one can know a character that an author never described in the first place. Wink

So the story of evolution has been a complete and total waste of time since it originated in the minds of men and is still happening in the imaginations of men with no conclusion since Darwin never described his main characters to begin with. :rollinglaugh: So they're as imaginary as each individual imagination. Thus the story of evolution is nothing but a fairy tale and a badly written one since it has no conclusion. Laughing


If you want my honest opinion. If you want to know how to debunk evolution, it's simple, find a Gazelle fossil in pre-Cambrian rock. This would demolish evolution. It doesn't even have to be a gazelle it could be any large mammal.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jul, 2009 08:24 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;67100 wrote:
If you want my honest opinion. If you want to know how to debunk evolution, it's simple, find a Gazelle fossil in pre-Cambrian rock. This would demolish evolution. It doesn't even have to be a gazelle it could be any large mammal.


Or a dog having human offspring. That would do it.
0 Replies
 
Carico
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jul, 2009 12:10 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;67082 wrote:
You again show your lack of knowledge.

CCR5delta32 isn't a gene. CCR5 is a gene. CCR5delta32 is the CCR5 gene with a hunk missing, hence delta (definition: deleted) 32 (length of deletion). It is a mutation of the CCR5 gene.

The hunk in particular is responsible for producing receptors on T-cells. Without this, the T-cells in your body (imagine this) don't have those particular receptors. HIV requires these to bind to the cell. It doesn't "arrest" a virus... it in no way attacks the virus. The virus simply cannot bind to the mutated cells.

We tested this recently. It removed an HIV infection from the patient.

You missed again. We have pinpointed the mutation, what it does, how to use it and where it came from.

This is evolutionary biology.


:eek: How do you know it's a mutation if there's a link missing? You can't. That's precisely my point. What they're doing is the same thing as looking at a human and claiming it once used to be an ape, then making up a story that ape genes simply mutated into human genes so humans are now mutants. :rollinglaugh: Sorry, stories from the imagination aren't facts. :rolleyes:

So again, since science is usually nothing more than speculation based on an observation, then they look at a cell, speculate that it used to be something else, then call it a mutation, then pass on their imagination as fact. All they know is that some people carry particular genes that are resistant to certain viruses and infections. That's all they know.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jul, 2009 02:26 am
@Carico,
Carico;67113 wrote:
:eek: How do you know it's a mutation if there's a link missing? You can't. That's precisely my point. What they're doing is the same thing as looking at a human and claiming it once used to be an ape, then making up a story that ape genes simply mutated into human genes so humans are now mutants. :rollinglaugh: Sorry, stories from the imagination aren't facts. :rolleyes:

So again, since science is usually nothing more than speculation based on an observation, then they look at a cell, speculate that it used to be something else, then call it a mutation, then pass on their imagination as fact. All they know is that some people carry particular genes that are resistant to certain viruses and infections. That's all they know.


You're missing again.

It is a mutation precisely because there is a piece missing. What happened is that portion of the gene didn't replicate properly... this happens more often than you'd think. There is no "missing link" (even you use THAT wrong), the deletion is a mutation of that gene. It differs from its original only in that respect... everything else works as it should.

This mutation just happens to do a real good job of keeping an HIV infection from starting.

You can't even get the definition of mutation properly. You're thinking fairy tales and Holllywood again.

By the by, "ape genes" and "human genes" are the same thing. The G, A, T and C are the exact same pieces in all life. How they are assembled makes a particular lifeform. Besides, chromosome 2 links us to apes. Research it.
0 Replies
 
JBeukema
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jul, 2009 01:35 pm
@Carico,
Carico;66901 wrote:
As I explained, since Darwin couldn't describe his main characters (the common ancestors) then his story never started at all. That's because since Darwin didn't know what or who man supposedly evolved from, then the story of evolution is nothing more than people going round and round in circles in their minds like a dog chasing its tail just to end right back up where they started from; "What's the origin of man?" :what:

Nobody knows because no one can know a character that an author never described in the first place. Wink

So the story of evolution has been a complete and total waste of time since it originated in the minds of men and is still happening in the imaginations of men with no conclusion since Darwin never described his main characters to begin with. :rollinglaugh: So they're as imaginary as each individual imagination. Thus the story of evolution is nothing but a fairy tale and a badly written one since it has no conclusion. Laughing


Are you mentally retarded, or do you just play an idiot on the internet?
0 Replies
 
JBeukema
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jul, 2009 01:36 pm
@Carico,
Want to debunk evolution? Find a flock of these....

http://freethoughtpedia.com/images/Crocoduck.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Evolution debunked
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 05:59:01