So, there are a variety of technologies that might be explored. Genetic modification might be limited to removing mutations known to cause serious medical problems. It might be extended to purposefully implanting mutations and alleles with beneficial effects into the children of those who choose to participate. We could look into, at some point, modifying man in more drastic methods to engineer our own form, be it by incorporating the DNA of other species or seeking to find a way to custom engineer ourselves using computers intent on decoding DNA. Should there be restrictions against 'aesthetic changes'?
We might look into cybernetics. The could be limited to repairing damaged bodies or extended to improving those who choose to participate (and can afford it, as costs will be prohibitive early on, in all probability).
What technologies and medicines should be explored and what limitations should be set in place?
Let us discuss that definition, then. Perhaps we should assemble a list of objectives we would like to see achieved and how we might measure success.
I propose::
-Identify hereditary genetic mutations that contribute to disease, including but not limited to
----Haemophilia
----Huntington's Disease
----Tay-Sachs
-----Neurofibromatosis
----Muscular dystrohy
----et al
-Identification, replication, and the distribution for optional inclusion of genetic mutations with significant discernible medical value and the potential to better the human condition, including but not limited to
the delta ccr5 mutation responsible for HIV resistance, following further study of its role and any possible side effects
-The study of medical treatments, genetic, chemical, neurological, and other, that might ease known medical conditions, including but not limited to searching for ways to improve the human ability to heal from injury and marrying electromechanical prosthetics to the neurological system to restore use of lost or damaged limbs, and slowing the rate of post-maturity senescence (aging) and body 'decay'.
[SIZE="4"]FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION:::
[/SIZE]
YouTube - The Ethical Use of Biotechnology: Debating the Science of Perfecting Humans
Quote:The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering with Michael Sandel and William Haseltine speaking at the 2007 Aspen Ideas Festival. Elliot Gerson moderates the discussion.
Eugenics is a dirty word. It is usually associated with forced sterilization, infanticide and all sorts of violations of human rights. But what about modern liberal consumer-driven eugenics? With the coercive and harmful aspects removed, is it still wrong?
Tell me what you think. Would you want it for your child?
YouTube - Is modern eugenics wrong? - Part 1 of 6
YouTube - Is modern eugenics wrong? - Part 2 of 6
YouTube - Is modern eugenics wrong? - Part 3 of 6
YouTube - Is modern eugenics wrong? - Part 4 of 6
YouTube - Is modern eugenics wrong? - Part 5 of 6
YouTube - Is modern eugenics wrong? - Part 6 of 6
YouTube - The Ethical Use of Biotechnology: Debating the Science of Perfecting Humans
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace