0
   

1,5 Million Year Old Footprints Refute Darwinism!!!

 
 
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2009 08:14 pm
1,5 MILLION YEAR OLD FOOTPRINTS IS A BRAND NEW, SHOCKING, SEVERE BLOW TO THE IMAGINARY EVOLUTION


The 21st century is the century when the collapse of Darwinism is declared. Following the unveiling of 100 million fossils declaring the collapse of Darwinism, the greatest blow to the theory is a newly found human foot print fossil. Contrary to all the Darwinist claims, this fossil indicates that CONTEMPORARY MAN WAS LIVING 1,5 MILLION YEARS AGO.

[CENTER]http://us1.harunyahya.com/Image/manzara/ayakizi.jpg[/CENTER]

Darwinist scientists who uncovered the fossil agree that the fossil they discovered in Kenya is THE SAME WITH THE CONTEMPORARY MAN. Among the foot prints discovered, there is also one belonging to a child. The measurements made according to the size of the foot print, gaps between fingers and the depth of the earth reveal that the particular feet print, which was discussed in Science magazine and then in news channels such as Reuters and BBC News, belongs to a human being of 1.79-1.80 (5 feet 9 inches). The very same measurements also make it possible to understand the weight, stride length and the gait. ALL THESE MEASUREMENTS MADE ON THE FOOTPRINT REVEALED THOSE OF THE CONTEMPORARY MAN.1

As is also understood from the footprint, the thumb of this person, AS IS THE CASE WITH CONTEMPORARY MAN, is parallel to other fingers. These prints had an arch in the foot THE WAY CONTEMPORARY MAN HAS and short fingers DEFINITELY CERTIFY UPRIGHT POSITION.2

David Braun, a researcher of the South Africa Cape Town University, states the following about the fossil:

?It was kind of creepy excavating these things to see all of a sudden something that looks so dramatically like something that you yourself could have made 20 minutes earlier in some kind of wet sediment just next to the site,?

Braun added:

?These could quite easily have been made on the beach today.?

This fact, which is openly confessed by Darwinist scientists and Darwinists publications, is not likely to be rejected. Claiming until presence that contemporary man appeared on Earth 200,000 years ago, Darwinists made up an imaginary scenario of evolution and made speculations upon it. However this foot print dating back to 1.5 million years, has the potency to remove all Darwinist speculations. There are millions of fossils refuting Darwinism. However, as is seen openly, even a single one of them has the potency to totally eliminate this obsolete theory.

It is High Time Darwinists Should Put an End to Homo Erectus Hoax

Despite this definite, clear and perfect fact, some of the Darwinist publications have not neglected to continue evolutionist propaganda, which they have made a tradition of, and claimed that these footprints belong to Homo Erectus. HOWEVER, THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE.

Homo Erectus story is the false ring required by the fraudulent sequence made up by Darwinists for the imaginary evolution of man. Darwinists deceived people for years by placing Austrolapitecus, which is in its real sense an ape lineage, in this imaginary sequence, and Homo Erectus, which is no different from contemporary man, between man and ape.

The most important references of evolutionists in calling Homo Erectus ?primitive? are its skull?s volume (900-1100 cc.), which is smaller than contemporary man?s average skull volume, and its thick eyebrow protrusion. However, there are also many people living in our day having the same average skull volume with Homo Erectus (for instance, pigmy) and there are also eyebrow protrusions in various races. (for instance Australian Aborigines). It is a known fact that intelligence changes not according to the brain?s volume but according to the organization within the brain. Consequently, it is not possible to label Homo Erectus as ?primitive.?

In this particular example it is clear that readers are face to face with Darwinist propaganda. The fossil in question is a footprint. We can understand the basic features of the living being mentioned above from the footprint and it provides important information. However, it is not possible to determine the skull volume of a human or the thickness of eyebrow protrusion from this footprint. As mentioned before, even if the living being possesses the features in question, this will not show that it is different from contemporary man. It will only show that it is the same with one of the races in our day, that is all.

Homo Erectus story is an outdated claim that is not even advocated by Darwinists themselves. Making up such a great lie even in the case of such an important footprint fossil related to the fraudulent nature of the story of the evolution of man, simply means to disdain readers and scientists, and is a grave accusation directed toward them. The scientific evidence refuting Darwinism will no longer be removed with the same fake methods.

Conclusion:

The process that began with the emergence of 100 million fossils proving Creation, which Darwinists strive to hide with care, is going on today with acceleration. The scenario of human evolution Darwinists try to inculcate in people?s minds for years by displaying fake skulls has ended in an amazing defeat. By the hands of Darwinist scientists, Allah unearthed an extraordinary evidence from the soil. In an undeniable way, Allah showed them that no living being, including human beings, has ever changed. Darwinist scientists have confessed this in Darwinist publications in their own words. Allah, with His name al-Jabbar (The Powerful, the Irresistible) made them confess Darwinism?s collapse. THIS IS AN INEVITABLE END OF DARWINISM. THIS IS THE PROMISE OF OUR LORD. The Glorious Allah will eliminate this deviant hoax and definitely solidify the truth.

... By His Words Allah wipes out the false and confirms the truth. He knows what the heart contains. (Surat ash-Shura, 24)

1http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
2http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
Mar 03, 2009
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,143 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2009 09:53 pm
@ahmetsecer,
You mean these?

Early Hominin Foot Morphology Based on 1.5-Million-Year-Old Footprints from Ileret, Kenya -- Bennett et al. 323 (5918): 1197 -- Science

The ones that say this?

"A comparison of the instep width relative to the width in the metatarsal head region shows that the upper prints at FwJj14E [Ileret] fall within the modern human range and are distinct from the relatively wider insteps characterizing the Laetoli prints (Fig. 4C)."

And...

"The angle of hallux abduction, relative to the long axis of the foot, is typically 14? compared to, and statistically distinct from (table S4), 8? for the modern reference prints and 27? for the Laetoli prints (Fig. 4A)."

Also...

"The interpretation of the Laetoli footprints has been and continues to be a matter of debate over whether they represent an essentially modern bipedal gait (S5-S9), a primitive gait (e.g., bent-hip, bent-knee) or unique form of gait (S10-S12), or whether the evidence to date is ambiguous (S13). Debate also continues over the interpretation of anatomy from the prints, with some researchers arguing that they point to a primitive foot structure bearing a slightly abducted hallux, relatively long, possibly curled lateral toes, and lacking both a medial longitudinal arch and evidence of a medial weight transfer (S10,S11,S14). Others instead argue that the Laetoli prints show evidence of a relatively modern human-like foot anatomy with evidence of a medial longitudinal arch (S5-S8), and these researchers point to the considerable variation in footprint structure, including variations in the degree of hallucal abduction and longitudinal arch height in the prints made by habitually shod and unshod modern humans (S6). Our study supports the hypotheses that the Laetoli prints were made by a foot whose hallux was much more adducted than in apes, but slightly and significantly more abducted than that of modern humans (Fig. 4A), with little positive evidence of medial weight transfer prior to push-off, or a longitudinal arch comparable to that seen in modern humans (Fig. S16). There is little doubt that compared to the modern great apes (S11, S15) the Laetoli prints and the hard tissue anatomy of contemporary hominins show evidence of a foot adapted for bipedalism including a more rigid tarsus but debate continues over whether the Laetoli footprints provide evidence of a modern human-like longitudinal arch (S6,S11)."

Creationist shams need to do their research Smile Nice try, though.
0 Replies
 
xexon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Apr, 2009 10:33 am
@ahmetsecer,
Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.


x
Grouch
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Apr, 2009 12:27 pm
@xexon,
xexon;64887 wrote:
Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.


x


That makes no ******* sense. :no:
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Apr, 2009 03:03 am
@xexon,
xexon;64887 wrote:
Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.


x


We know enough to produce medicines and design medical proceedurs which keep you alive. We know enough to maintain and increase agricultural output.

Your ego may need just a few notches taken out of it. Just because you don't understand the concept doesn't make it "dangerous". However fear is the first reaction most have to an unknown concept.
0 Replies
 
Numpty
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Apr, 2009 08:56 am
@xexon,
xexon;64887 wrote:
Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.


x


There is no puzzle. It has/is scientificlly proven through many many ways the fact of evolution is testable. There is no confusion about evolution. There is debate about the mechanisms for influencing, the generics regarding evolution are standard.

Egos come from those who believe in something they have no way of proving exists. Erm like you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 1,5 Million Year Old Footprints Refute Darwinism!!!
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/21/2026 at 03:34:17