1,5 Million Year Old Footprints Refute Darwinism!!!

Forums: Science, Technology
Email this Topic • Print this Page

1,5 MILLION YEAR OLD FOOTPRINTS IS A BRAND NEW, SHOCKING, SEVERE BLOW TO THE IMAGINARY EVOLUTION

The 21st century is the century when the collapse of Darwinism is declared. Following the unveiling of 100 million fossils declaring the collapse of Darwinism, the greatest blow to the theory is a newly found human foot print fossil. Contrary to all the Darwinist claims, this fossil indicates that CONTEMPORARY MAN WAS LIVING 1,5 MILLION YEARS AGO.

[CENTER]

http://us1.harunyahya.com/Image/manzara/ayakizi.jpg

[/CENTER]

Darwinist scientists who uncovered the fossil agree that the fossil they discovered in Kenya is THE SAME WITH THE CONTEMPORARY MAN. Among the foot prints discovered, there is also one belonging to a child. The measurements made according to the size of the foot print, gaps between fingers and the depth of the earth reveal that the particular feet print, which was discussed in Science magazine and then in news channels such as Reuters and BBC News, belongs to a human being of 1.79-1.80 (5 feet 9 inches). The very same measurements also make it possible to understand the weight, stride length and the gait. ALL THESE MEASUREMENTS MADE ON THE FOOTPRINT REVEALED THOSE OF THE CONTEMPORARY MAN.1

As is also understood from the footprint, the thumb of this person, AS IS THE CASE WITH CONTEMPORARY MAN, is parallel to other fingers. These prints had an arch in the foot THE WAY CONTEMPORARY MAN HAS and short fingers DEFINITELY CERTIFY UPRIGHT POSITION.2

David Braun, a researcher of the South Africa Cape Town University, states the following about the fossil:

... By His Words Allah wipes out the false and confirms the truth. He knows what the heart contains. (Surat ash-Shura, 24)

1http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
2http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE51P82420090227?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
Mar 03, 2009

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,020 • Replies: 5

No top replies

@ahmetsecer,

You mean these?

Early Hominin Foot Morphology Based on 1.5-Million-Year-Old Footprints from Ileret, Kenya -- Bennett et al. 323 (5918): 1197 -- Science

The ones that say this?

"A comparison of the instep width relative to the width in the metatarsal head region shows that the upper prints at FwJj14E [Ileret] fall within the modern human range and are distinct from the relatively wider insteps characterizing the Laetoli prints (Fig. 4C)."

And...

Also...

"The interpretation of the Laetoli footprints has been and continues to be a matter of debate over whether they represent an essentially modern bipedal gait (S5-S9), a primitive gait (e.g., bent-hip, bent-knee) or unique form of gait (S10-S12), or whether the evidence to date is ambiguous (S13). Debate also continues over the interpretation of anatomy from the prints, with some researchers arguing that they point to a primitive foot structure bearing a slightly abducted hallux, relatively long, possibly curled lateral toes, and lacking both a medial longitudinal arch and evidence of a medial weight transfer (S10,S11,S14). Others instead argue that the Laetoli prints show evidence of a relatively modern human-like foot anatomy with evidence of a medial longitudinal arch (S5-S8), and these researchers point to the considerable variation in footprint structure, including variations in the degree of hallucal abduction and longitudinal arch height in the prints made by habitually shod and unshod modern humans (S6). Our study supports the hypotheses that the Laetoli prints were made by a foot whose hallux was much more adducted than in apes, but slightly and significantly more abducted than that of modern humans (Fig. 4A), with little positive evidence of medial weight transfer prior to push-off, or a longitudinal arch comparable to that seen in modern humans (Fig. S16). There is little doubt that compared to the modern great apes (S11, S15) the Laetoli prints and the hard tissue anatomy of contemporary hominins show evidence of a foot adapted for bipedalism including a more rigid tarsus but debate continues over whether the Laetoli footprints provide evidence of a modern human-like longitudinal arch (S6,S11)."

Creationist shams need to do their research Smile

Nice try, though.

0 Replies

@ahmetsecer,

Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.

x

3 Replies

@xexon,

xexon;64887 wrote:

Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.

x

That makes no ******* sense. :no:

0 Replies

@xexon,

xexon;64887 wrote:

Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.

x

We know enough to produce medicines and design medical proceedurs which keep you alive. We know enough to maintain and increase agricultural output.

Your ego may need just a few notches taken out of it. Just because you don't understand the concept doesn't make it "dangerous". However fear is the first reaction most have to an unknown concept.

0 Replies

@xexon,

xexon;64887 wrote:

Humanity knows just enough about evolution as to be dangerous.

Big puzzle. Few pieces. Big ego.

x

There is no puzzle. It has/is scientificlly proven through many many ways the fact of evolution is testable. There is no confusion about evolution. There is debate about the mechanisms for influencing, the generics regarding evolution are standard.

Egos come from those who believe in something they have no way of proving exists. Erm like you.

0 Replies

1,5 Million Year Old Footprints Refute Darwinism!!!

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know