'BWAHAHAHAHA, wow, that was funny.'
Well, dammo, there's convincing then! Bloody bright, these Neanderthals!
There's nothing to "convince" in a person as far gone as you.
You'd be surprised how often I've been convinced by rational argument to change my opinion. Unfortunately it is dying out!
You want an example of "political correctness"? Affirmative Action is political correctness in action, and racist to boot. The hiring/admitting of minority workers based solely on the color of their skin is a prime example of political correctness. Calling the Mailman, a Mail Person because mailman is chauvinist, saying "Happy Holidays" instead of Merry Christmas so that you don't offend some overly sensitive weenies fragile sense of self.
This debate maybe linked to age. People born into Political Correctness can't compare it with a life without it. A fish doesn't know it's a fish until it breaches the water.
And, after 1970 school books began this Liberal assault on learning. I find myself being asked to offer book sources for what was so common place, it wasn't worthy of being written in book form.
Possibly for them, it is "normal" to refer to a Mail Person as such and Affirmative Action was just the way it has always been.
What do you think?
Prove it. Post the unequivocal proof that 97% of climatologist believe humans significantly contribute to global warming.
How many people are in the scientific community? And what percentage is 30,000?
And what percentage is 30,000 of scientist that study the climate?
Is ScienceDaily a good enough source for you?
Scientists Agree Human-induced Global Warming Is Real, Survey Says
According to AAAS, there were 5.8 million science and engineering researchers in 2006.
30,000 would be approximately 0.0051724% of the total scientific community
I would tell you that, except that 30,000 is already including scientists in other non-climate related fields of study. Which is exactly why it's a bull**** figure.
Sounds about right to me. Though that doesn't explain Holder not being able to bring himself to say that radical islam drove terrorist to their actions. But then again he isn't born into it, he is a part of it, as well as an apologist, and another prime example of "political correctness" in the extreme. The simple fact that he just would not admit it is proof positive.
Nope, not unequivocal. And ...2009? So much has happened since then it isn't even funny.
Prove it's a bull**** figure, don't just say it.