@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;61059 wrote:sabz - I appreciate that you're a science guy. I share your zeal for study. But, do not be blinded by your advocacy. There are immediate needs that deserve priority.
Alright, I'll give you that. I will admit that there are many things more important than a planetarium. However you've gotta admit that this isn't just some "overhead projector" and that it actually serves a beneficial, educational purpose. It's not wasted money, it's money better spent elsewhere at the time, but it's not a waste.
As an aside, the device this thing was supposed to replace (they didn't get the funding, BTW) is 40 years old, starting to fail and no longer supported by its manufacturer. You asked if it was outdated... the answer is "Yes, very."
To get an idea of why this thing costs three-large, download a copy of a program called Celestia (it's open-source) and check that out. Imagine that up on a planetarium dome. That's why.
Celestia: Home