0
   

Evolution Of 'Irreducible Complexity' Explained

Forums: Science, Technology
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Sabz5150
 
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2008 06:24 am
Evolution Of 'Irreducible Complexity' Explained

Using new techniques for resurrecting ancient genes, scientists have for the first time reconstructed the Darwinian evolution of an apparently "irreducibly complex" molecular system.

"So-called irreducible complexity was just a reflection of a limited ability to see how evolution works. By reaching back to the ancestral forms of genes, we were able to show just how this crucial hormone-receptor pair evolved."

How neat Smile
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 718 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2008 04:17 pm
@Sabz5150,
Has there actually been any 'irreducibly complex' systems found? I know the bacterial flagellum was supposed to be one of them but that was discard as well..
0 Replies
 
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 08:51 am
@Sabz5150,
Looks like you are selectively editing what you don't agree with? This thread seems rather short. How scientific of you. Can't handle others with opposing views seems, counter productive to the title of the site, don't you think? But you science guys know better right.
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:00 am
@Sabz5150,
If you have data with scientific fact pointing to these hypotheses, feel free to post it up.

Otherwise it's more of the same from you... zero real substance, 100% hot air.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:44 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56483 wrote:
If you have data with scientific fact pointing to these hypotheses, feel free to post it up.

Otherwise it's more of the same from you... zero real substance, 100% hot air.

Does that give you the right to delete it? Free speech is not allowed in here?
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:46 am
@Sabz5150,
This must be one of your example's of objectivity?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:46 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56498 wrote:
Does that give you the right to delete it? Free speech is not allowed in here?


Delete what? I have no moderation abilities.
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:48 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56499 wrote:
This must be one of your example's of objectivity?


You believe something with no evidence. You have no objectivity from the start... bias is automatic.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:53 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56501 wrote:
You believe something with no evidence. You have no objectivity from the start... bias is automatic.

You believe evolution just poof, appeared?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:56 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56505 wrote:
You believe evolution just poof, appeared?


How many times today are you going to show us your scientific ignorance?

Where does evolutionary science say "*poof*, appeared"? Absolutely nowhere.

Evolution DOES NOT deal with the origins of life.

Besides, isn't "*POOF*, APPEAR".... your belief? God just clapped his hands and life was here. I like how you are criticizing your own view. Makes my life easier.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:00 am
@Sabz5150,
Also, isn't Irreducible Complexity the idea that life could not have evolved and must have appeared fully formed?

As in *POOF*, appeared?
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:09 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56507 wrote:
How many times today are you going to show us your scientific ignorance?

Where does evolutionary science say "*poof*, appeared"? Absolutely nowhere.

Evolution DOES NOT deal with the origins of life.

Besides, isn't "*POOF*, APPEAR".... your belief? God just clapped his hands and life was here. I like how you are criticizing your own view. Makes my life easier.
Quote:
How many times today are you going to show us your scientific ignorance?
As many times as i like.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:09 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56508 wrote:
Also, isn't Irreducible Complexity the idea that life could not have evolved and must have appeared fully formed?

As in *POOF*, appeared?
What's your opinion of where it came from big shot?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 01:52 pm
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56513 wrote:
What's your opinion of where it came from big shot?


Ohhhhhhhhhh no, no, no "Big Shot".

The question is aimed at you. Time to answer. Unless you doubt your faith.

You doubt your faith, don't you? No surprise... with no evidence to back up a wild claim, anyone would doubt it.
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 04:39 pm
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56512 wrote:
As many times as i like.


If that ain't the truth...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

U.S. Lags World in Grasp of Genetics and Acceptance of Evolution - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion? - Discussion by wandeljw
New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
New species of hominid discovered - Question by FBM
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
More (much more) dinosaur soft tissue turning up - Discussion by gungasnake
Must Scientific Knowledge Be Considered Relative? - Discussion by wandeljw
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Evolution Of 'Irreducible Complexity' Explained
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 02:58:33
▲ ▼