0
   

Deleting of objectional materials dealing with science

 
 
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:51 am
Who's doing it? There is one thread that has been altered, is this managament or someone inflicting his view of science?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,013 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:53 am
@DiversityDriven,
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whine, whine, whine! Why don't you put this "objectional" material RIGHT HERE.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:07 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56504 wrote:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whine, whine, whine! Why don't you put this "objectional" material RIGHT HERE.
And this post is what? Your the king of whiners, you a lib remember. To answer, i'll put is where ever i want.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 01:49 pm
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56511 wrote:
And this post is what? Your the king of whiners, you a lib remember. To answer, i'll put is where ever i want.


Funny, I didnt make a topic crying about deleted posts.

Just more whining from you. Just like your PMs, you are completely full of crap.
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Apr, 2008 12:06 pm
@DiversityDriven,
So Sanchez, what thread was altered? What post was deleted?

Or are you just bearing false witness again?
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Apr, 2008 09:10 am
@DiversityDriven,
Two days later... still nothing.
0 Replies
 
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2008 10:39 am
@DiversityDriven,
knock knock
0 Replies
 
Silverchild79
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Apr, 2008 09:52 am
@DiversityDriven,
to my knowledge nothing has been altered
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Apr, 2008 10:19 am
@DiversityDriven,
I think what's going on is that there were two threads with similar titles and DD mistook one for another.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Apr, 2008 10:45 am
@DiversityDriven,
Could be.
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Apr, 2008 06:08 am
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;56995 wrote:
I think what's going on is that there were two threads with similar titles and DD mistook one for another.


That or he's just stirring the sh*t pot as usual.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Apr, 2008 09:17 pm
@DiversityDriven,
Your ridin in the sheit pot.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 06:59 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;57088 wrote:
Your ridin in the sheit pot.


I'm not the one making false accusations :no:
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 01:59 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;57059 wrote:
That or he's just stirring the sh*t pot as usual.


He's not that bad, really. Unless you're making unverifiable assumptions about his previous identity or identities.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 02:04 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;57115 wrote:
He's not that bad, really. Unless you're making unverifiable assumptions about his previous identity or identities.


Naah, this one identity is enough.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Deleting of objectional materials dealing with science
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 05:25:07