Sounds like you are offended by his sexual preference? I thought being gay was ok, i guess is your gay and repug it's not?

If only you could form sentences which made any sense.
I am not offended by his sexual preference. It doesn't matter if one is Repub or Dem...If you're gay, be gay...if you're gay, and lying about it...and married and got kids, and they don't know about it...you're reprehensible. I know that is like zooming over your head...get one of your posse to explain it to you.
He is perpetrating a fraud...not only to his family, but to his constituency, and the nation. That is the reason he should be condemned...not for his sexual preference...which, by the way, he has denied. A liar, and a hypocrite, to boot.

Nope. Sexuality is complicated. There are many married men who, deep down, feel gay impulses, which they've suppressed due to the influences of cultural upbringing. As they age, they find them hard to manage. Some succumb to temptation, while others don't. The Catholic priesthood is full of men who thought living the cloistered life would prevent them from acting on their homosexual appetites. Many discover that no, being a priest doesn't guarantee celibacy. Sexuality is murky stuff. It's a major, driving force in human behavior.

There's a few others that need to be under the buss too.

The United States Attorney's Office - District of New Jersey

09-06-07 -- TRENTON -- In a public corruption investigation that progressed from southern to northern New Jersey, five members of the same local Atlantic County school board, two state Assemblyman from Passaic and Essex Counties, the mayor of Passaic and one current and one former Passaic city council member, and the chief of staff to the Newark City Council president were arrested today and charged with taking cash bribes to influence the award of public contracts. Contact: Michael Drewniak, PIO, 973-645-2888.

Public Corruption News Release (.pdf)

Steele Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Rivera Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Hackett Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Soto Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Jackson Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Reid Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Adams Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Callaway & Mister Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

McCormick Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Pressley Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Velez Criminal Complaint (.pdf)

Guess what they all have in common? You guessed it, a capitol D in front of there name. Is that scandal enough or is it required to be sexual?[/QUOTE


Sexual....we were talking sex. I have no idea what pissant charges these people you listed have against them...but it pales in comparison to morally bankrupt Republicans......high profile Republicans...not some assemblymen, potato.

Nope. Sexuality is complicated. There are many married men who, deep down, feel gay impulses, which they've suppressed due to the influences of cultural upbringing. As they age, they find them hard to manage. Some succumb to temptation, while others don't. The Catholic priesthood is full of men who thought living the cloistered life would prevent them from acting on their homosexual appetites. Many discover that no, being a priest doesn't guarantee celibacy. Sexuality is murky stuff. It's a major, driving force in human behavior.

were he a Democrat, you be on him like white on rice. Hypocritical to say the least.

Quote:

Why you gotta make this a "white" thing?

aaronssongs;37405 wrote:

were he a Democrat, you be on him like white on rice. Hypocritical to say the least.

Quote:

Why you gotta make this a "white" thing?

Because there is a clear and not so inconspicuous "double standard"....why was it that Dennis Hastert, hemmed and hawwed, when asked, initially about Mark Foley???? Why did he claim to have no prior knowledge of his carrying ons???
Because just like "good ol' boys", Republicans refuse to cash in their own...even when it is obvious that the accused is "guilty as sin". Never....Bush can't think of any mistake that he's made, and Republicans are as white as snow (no pun intended)....
Y'all make it a "white thing" or a "black thing" or a "gay thing"....we all fall short of the glory...but y'all would never admit that.
You all make all kinds of accusations, asides, innuendo, and really just say any g.d. thing that comes to your mind (without thinking about the repercussions), and when called on it...it becomes the other person's issue...you never, ever take responsibility for your own s... Never!
Someone made a hideous racial slur against Whoopi Goldberg...just fell out of their mouth. Why? Because she had something controversial to say about the Vick incident...well, they used that comment to slime her. No big deal....just some "uppity" black actress/comedienne, with dred locks (which some folk see as "threatening"), who ought to keep her big mouth closed.
But then, after I pointed out that the comment was "racist"...all hell broke loose. It became about me, and how all my commentary is about "race and sexual orientation"...hot button topics for everybody else, but not me. It makes people uncomfortable...they don't want to look at their own issues...and how dare Aaron force us to do just that. I say, get over yourselves...and deal with your own issues...and quit pointing fingers.

crackface_mcgee;38194 wrote:

aaronssongs;37405 wrote:

were he a Democrat, you be on him like white on rice. Hypocritical to say the least.

Because there is a clear and not so inconspicuous "double standard"....why was it that Dennis Hastert, hemmed and hawwed, when asked, initially about Mark Foley???? Why did he claim to have no prior knowledge of his carrying ons???
Because just like "good ol' boys", Republicans refuse to cash in their own...even when it is obvious that the accused is "guilty as sin". Never....Bush can't think of any mistake that he's made, and Republicans are as white as snow (no pun intended)....
Y'all make it a "white thing" or a "black thing" or a "gay thing"....we all fall short of the glory...but y'all would never admit that.
You all make all kinds of accusations, asides, innuendo, and really just say any g.d. thing that comes to your mind (without thinking about the repercussions), and when called on it...it becomes the other person's issue...you never, ever take responsibility for your own s... Never!
Someone made a hideous racial slur against Whoopi Goldberg...just fell out of their mouth. Why? Because she had something controversial to say about the Vick incident...well, they used that comment to slime her. No big deal....just some "uppity" black actress/comedienne, with dred locks (which some folk see as "threatening"), who ought to keep her big mouth closed.
But then, after I pointed out that the comment was "racist"...all hell broke loose. It became about me, and how all my commentary is about "race and sexual orientation"...hot button topics for everybody else, but not me. It makes people uncomfortable...they don't want to look at their own issues...and how dare Aaron force us to do just that. I say, get over yourselves...and deal with your own issues...and quit pointing fingers.

Oh Jeez. I was kidding. I'm not even going to read your post.

aaronssongs;38203 wrote:

crackface_mcgee;38194 wrote:

Oh Jeez. I was kidding. I'm not even going to read your post.

Like I care. Folks don't like hearing "the truth"...makes them uncomfortable...you're feeling uncomfortable, aren't you? Of course you don't want to read my post....you'd have to admit that there is some truth to what I have said....which would fly in the face of many.
It's ok. Stick your head in the sand. Cover your ears. Shield your eyes....maybe it'll go away.

That's his thing- it all boils down to race or sexual orientaion.

crackface_mcgee;38230 wrote:

aaronssongs;38203 wrote:

Like I care. Folks don't like hearing "the truth"...makes them uncomfortable...you're feeling uncomfortable, aren't you? Of course you don't want to read my post....you'd have to admit that there is some truth to what I have said....which would fly in the face of many.
It's ok. Stick your head in the sand. Cover your ears. Shield your eyes....maybe it'll go away.

I didn't read it because it's really not important, and I know by now that you are SO incredibly far-left, obsessed, and in my opinion, derranged. If there was a hint of moderation in any of the opinions you spew on this site, then maybe you could be taken seriously. But you preach only to those on the far left who villianize all things right of the far left. I believe you help to turn away from your side anyone who may be on the fence on any issue. Actually, I appreciate it. But I'm not gonna read it because I know that I would not be enlightened, just nauseated.

aaronssongs;38246 wrote:

crackface_mcgee;38230 wrote:

I didn't read it because it's really not important, and I know by now that you are SO incredibly far-left, obsessed, and in my opinion, derranged. If there was a hint of moderation in any of the opinions you spew on this site, then maybe you could be taken seriously. But you preach only to those on the far left who villianize all things right of the far left. I believe you help to turn away from your side anyone who may be on the fence on any issue. Actually, I appreciate it. But I'm not gonna read it because I know that I would not be enlightened, just nauseated.

Baby, you got that right...I am "far left"....couldn't be more.
But the only deranged (would be the spelling) people are Republicans and conservatives...except for maybe Hagel and Spector, and Schwartzenegger.
I had thought John Warner to be salvageable, but as he just sided with Bush against the democrats, when he voted against the plan to regulate US Troop Deployment Cycles in Iraq in US Senate, he was the last hope of any Repubs for the likes of me....looks like you're still reading, though. LOL