1
   

Feminism And The Control Of Womanhood

 
 
z0z0
 
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 07:53 am
Feminism And The Control Of Womanhood
Nancy Levant -- Feminism and the Control of Womanhood

Nancy Levant
January 9, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

I received a note from a ?feminist? who was quite disturbed with my opinions about ?feminism.? Her arguments were dialectically predictable as she simply regurgitated the pat lines of the movement, but for the benefit of young women who grow up amidst the dialectic, I will respond with clarity.

The one-world government scenario is dialectically based upon economics, environment, and equity ? known as the Three E?s. These Three E?s involve global control of the common man?s labor and money, ?sustainable? nature, and forcing all commoners into financial sameness. These same intentions are also documented in the U.N. Agenda 21 game plan for our ?sustainable? environmental future.

The feminist movement was crafted by the one-world political initiative and invented to create and sustain global depopulation goals. That is and remains the primary mission of the feminist movement.

Women?s ?rights? are disallowed definition by culture, religion, personal opinion, or any other social definition minus the feminist movement. In today?s world, we have no choices as women, whatsoever, but to agree to the think tank morality written and coded by this global movement. The feminist movement is no different than the global environmental movement, the global healthcare movement, the global education movement, or the global economy movement. All are social re-engineering tactics used to forward the take over of all world governments, economies, and cultures, and to force all commoners into the custom-made livelihoods and service of corporate-based governors. According to this government, we have no choices but to accept them all.

The ?governors? are the world?s wealthiest industrialists and bankers. Their one-world government hands all power and control of people, land, water, food, human health, children and education, employment, militaries, and economic potential directly to themselves and their personal fortunes. Over and over and over again, when you tie corporate wealth and power to governing agencies, you have Fascism. However, the long-term goal of a one-world government has always been to bring Communism to fruition on a global scale. So, today, we see a hybrid Fascist-Communist system by Three E design, and it is bitterly obvious in every nation on the planet. Almost all global economies are crashing by design, and particularly America?s economy. Note that America?s elite pulled their investments out of the U.S. years ago.

The feminist piece of the global puzzle deals specifically with depopulation through women?s ?healthcare,? big pharma, and the ?mental health? industrial complex. Women?s rights are now defined by the right to abort, the right to be drafted, and the right to take drugs that will render women and children incapable of bearing children. And just as many women worldwide earned the right to own property, that right has now fallen to other plans, which state that no ?individual? may own private property.

Also, one must note that the industrial and banking powers that be are mostly men ? the men whose dynastic families created their one-world government of choice. And these same men also created the feminist movement in order to curb the tendencies of commoners to breed and out-number them billions to one. The feminist movement is based upon political lies and the control of reproduction. ?Sustainable? nature is also based upon enforcing a remarkable decline in birth rates. I assure you this enforcement will not fall upon the world?s elite.

Equally, and thanks to the help of the feminist movement, ?mental health? has taken center stage in the lives of women and children in the United States. It is estimated that 25 million American women are now taking ?anti-depressants.? In the 1980?s and 1990?s, it became chic to seek ?therapy.? Women ran in droves to see ?therapists? and to tell their social circles they were taking anti-depressants. The mental health complex has now arrived in every American school, and they are now arriving in America?s daycare centers. The main impetus for the mental health ?advocates? is to screen and profile America?s families to see if they are religious, procreating, and if they are mainstreaming into new government citizens. All children who fall short are then redirected to the mental health industries, which then feed the big pharma complex, which 1) drugs children, and 2) determines who will be ?fit? to reproduce in the future. Let us also wonder if the mass drugging of children ? and new vaccines specifically targeted to pubescent female children ? will not result in future ?problems? with reproductive health.

In today?s new world, women are also ?checked? for mental health issues during and following pregnancy. In a nutshell of truth, women are profiled for the number of pregnancies, the health of pregnancies and babies, and genetically data based. This we are to call ?liberation.?

Today?s ?liberated? women are still raising children - many of which are raising children alone ? and they are working one or two jobs to make end?s meet. Today?s ?liberated? women are obsessed with weight, beauty, divorce, money, spending money, and careers to make money. They are far less concerned with their children, who are now raised in state-controlled (government) daycare centers, federally controlled (government) public schools, and state controlled (government) universities. In other words, the government is raising our children in ways that the government sees fit ? the government of the world?s industrialists and world bankers. Your children are being raised by and into the new world order, while you are working to support the new world order rather than your children. Truth hurts, doesn?t it? Take a pill. You will feel much better ? or, perhaps, nothing much at all.

Let me give the women of the West a clue ? ?liberation? means that you are free ? free to think as you choose and free to create your life according to your efforts and your beliefs. I suggest to you that the ?liberation? you have achieved through the misguidance of the feminist movement is false. I suggest that Westernized women are often miserable, overworked, and suffering due to separation from their children. Think of it this way ? the feminist movement actually believed they could change the fundamental meaning and purpose of womanhood, biological and instinctual gendering, and that they could culturally remove children from mothers, and call it ?liberation.? You are equally liberated to destroy any children that you don?t want. Wow. I guess that means that you have a great deal of power. Congratulations. It is far greater to be a drugged laborer than a mother. Let us thank the feminist movement for making this clear to us dim-witted females.

If you are a woman in today?s new world, I suggest you read The Cultural Devastation of American Women. None of us have come unscathed through this new world culture, for it has been working on us for many, many decades. Once read, you will begin to decipher the facts from all the dialectic fiction. Read the other side for a change. Find out why you are, in fact, depressed and unhappy as contemporary women. Find out why your children are very much the same.

And to the world?s feminists ? I say this: You are the dumbest women who have ever walked the face of the Earth. Week by week, day by day, you are losing every right you thought you invented. You fell hook, line, and sinker into the dialectic, and you are nothing but dictator pawns to the larger mission of total control over people and freedom. What a shame when arrogance literally beats brains useless. What a crime and a shame when you brutally victimize the very people you claim to represent ? much like all other destroyers of human freedom. The day will come when you and your brothers in crime will be fully understood for your true missions. The day will come when YOU finally comprehend what you actually stood for ? the total denial of rights and freedom for all.

? 2007 Nancy Levant - All Rights Reserved
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,790 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
z0z0
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Jan, 2007 07:54 am
@z0z0,
Following the growth of the Femi-Nazi movement there was a clear drop in the birthrate of the First World Western Countries (Europe + North America).

Coincidence? Seems like women no longer want to be "females".
0 Replies
 
elfishmoonfeather
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 10:25 pm
@z0z0,
Sexist Pigs:

I ask you, If a boy (12-20) makes an inappropriate comment, the mother/father/adult says, "It's HORMONES"
If a girl (12-20) makes an inappropriate comment, the mother/father/adult says, "STOP IT, act more ladylike."

What, are we supposed to be able to control ourselves more than guys? Bullshit.

This is a typical example of sexism toward women, and without the feminism movement, we would be right back where we were, cooking and cleaning for the family.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 10:47 pm
@z0z0,
Quote:
What, are we supposed to be able to control ourselves more than guys?

You are the fairer sex. There is a big difference between a real Lady and a regular women. A lady carry's herself differently. When a gentleman holds the door for you, do you accept of do you demand your independence?
0 Replies
 
z0z0
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Jan, 2007 10:51 pm
@z0z0,
Feminism = Death of Chivalry

I open doors for people.
I hope that people open doors for me.

I do not open doors for women just because they are women.
I do not move chairs for women when they want to sit at a table.

Women can do whatever they want.

But ... they can never evade the fact they are FEMALES.

To tell you the truth I wish that I as a man could bear children.
0 Replies
 
elfishmoonfeather
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Jan, 2007 12:38 pm
@z0z0,
I didn't say women had to be ladies or men had to be gentlemen. As regular men and women, they should not be treated any differently, except in sexuality.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Jan, 2007 12:30 pm
@z0z0,
cynical, selfish and unnatural as an agenda and movement. Women do have,of course, basic human dignity in every instance, including the workforce and workplace. They have the same rights of self-actualization as anyone else. :headbang:
0 Replies
 
0Megabyte
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Apr, 2007 05:59 pm
@z0z0,
How about this, can everyone agree to this?

Unlike in the not-so-golden past of humanity, or in many places, the not-so-golden present, let's not treat women as chattel.

Agree? Good, I thought you would.

Now, I have a feeling we would all agree women should be allowed, say, to vote, to own property, to be paid the same amount as men for the same jobs, to have their choice in professions, to go to college, believe what they desire, have kids when they desire, to marry who they desire, live where they desire, do the things they desire, worship as they desire, and, you know, be treated as first-class citizens.

Now, same as above for men, also. (What? I'm lazy, and said all those things once already. )

Is that fine with everyone? Everybody gets the same freedoms, etc? I figure everyone agrees with that, right? I'd imagine you do, but do tell me if you disagree.

Now, our society, naturally, has a bunch of problems. But can we agree that freedom and political equality?

I dunno about what was being said before, I don't really care about dialectics and whatnot. But are there any problems with what I listed? Yes or no?
0 Replies
 
markx15
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 02:52 am
@z0z0,
No problems, but it might be easier to sumerize them maybe this: They have a right to Freedom, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, as long as it doesn't interfere with anyone else's.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 07:08 am
@z0z0,
As it says in the Constitution, Life, Liberty, and the persuit of Happyness.
0 Replies
 
Tulip cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 08:03 am
@z0z0,
geesh, I just find this type of writing a waste of energy, even to read it, and once l got the gist of it l stopped. I am a woman and have working in an industry where l have come across discrimination, heck my own father was a discriminator. I have reached this conclusion - we are all spiritual beings in vessels called our bodies. So black or white, male or female, we are all the same. I think that any movement for equal rights is valid, and important in shaping our world and evolving from the place of ignorance. There is always going to be those who take it to the enth degree and make 'ignorance' into more than it is.
It is simply ignorance that is programed into our minds that one physical appearance is better than another. That is all it is, because it has nothing to do with anger or shame or resentment. Those are all choices we make to react to an outside circumstance.
The simple truth is a spiritual one, not a physical one. So such a reaction as the one that started this thread is just ignorant of the truth.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 04:11 pm
@z0z0,
I think everyone has an equal chance, some just choose not to make something of it. That's what the orignal feminists and civil rights leaders were about, not these sloganeering "The white male is putting us down" 'civil rights activists.'
0 Replies
 
Tulip cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 04:43 pm
@z0z0,
Equality is sadly not happening for women, however, their is no point giving ignorance attention...like everything in life that presents challenges, when their is unequality and the path is more difficult, then it makes a winner stronger and more determined.
0 Replies
 
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 06:33 pm
@z0z0,
Well said , Tulip!
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 06:39 pm
@z0z0,
I think it's all good and well to say that about some Islamic country under sharia-law, but there is mostly de jure equality in the West. You can never pound prejudices out of people's minds. It would be severe indoctrination. Unfornutately, it seems as tough we've tried to simply balance out the prejudice by having it on both sides, which has been a massive failure. You can only make stereotypes undesirable in the public forum, which we've done to a fault on one side but not at all on the other side.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Feminism And The Control Of Womanhood
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/23/2026 at 04:35:19