4
   

Oz Election Thread #4 - Gillard's Labor

 
 
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2010 05:18 pm
Just throwing this cartoon in here, because it gave me a laugh. Former Victorian (Liberal) premier, Jeff Kennett, claimed this week that he'd been shot at during his term. He says he heard the "sound" of a bullet, which narrowly missed him. However, one of his professional bodyguards (who stayed very close!) says he might have been dreaming. If Jeff heard it, his minders would surely have heard it, too, yes?

During his term as premier, Jeff Kennett privatized or corporatized just about any publicly-own utility that moved! Schools, hospitals, new bits of freeways, etc, etc, etc ...you name it, it ended up in the hands of big business.
It was an extremely bleak time for many of us, I can tell you.

After his government was defeated, he went on to run Beyond Blue, to advocate for the sufferers of depression. (which was a very interesting , as he single-handedly depressed more Victorians during the term of his government than just about any one person in the whole history of the state! )

Anyway, to cut a long rave short, Jeff's mouth was NEVER known to be shut! Laughing


http://images.theage.com.au/2010/10/15/1988598/Tandberg-kennett-15-10-2010-600x400.gif
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2010 05:20 pm
Please pardon that digression.
I really couldn't help myself!
(Horrible, horrible man! Neutral )
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Oct, 2010 05:36 pm
Bob Ellis writes about interviewing Abbott - clearly he's anti-Julia and a little pro-Tony, some interesting factlets about Afghanistan in there too.
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/40182.html
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2010 06:55 pm
@hingehead,
Agreed, hinge. He's a lot kinder to Abbott than toward Gillard in this piece.
He appears to be saying that Abbott is more cultured (or something?) than Gillard, so seems worthier of some sort of grudging respect than she is. Have I got that wrong? Confused
I think the questions Ellis poses about our involvement in Afghanistan are valid ones, but all we're getting is the same old jargon from both Gillard & Abbott. Neither is addressing the important issues in parliament. The reality is we'll stay as long as the US stays. And I guess that's not a very easy position to defend.
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2010 08:08 pm
@msolga,
My recollection is that the Soviet system fell apart a couple of years after they withdrew from Afghanistan. Maybe fear of history repeating will keep the Yanks there for a while.

I haven't seen much coverage of the debate, except that Julia says we'll be there into the next decade, but only as fighting troops for the next four years.

Which looks like middle ground with Libs wanting more fighting troops over there, and the Greens wanting out.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Oct, 2010 03:08 am
Today's Moir (SMH).:

http://images.theage.com.au/2010/10/20/1998658/Moir_21_10-600x400.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Oct, 2010 03:00 pm
Just posted this morning.
I must say I'm surprised at the Lib's gains, though not at the Greens' improved position ... :


Quote:
New poll shows fall in support for Labor
Posted 1 hour 19 minutes ago

The Coalition is leading Labor on a two-party preferred basis, 51 per cent to 49 per cent.

The latest Nielsen poll shows that the Federal Government's primary vote has dropped by 4 per cent, to 34 per cent.

The Greens primary vote has increased by 2 per cent to 14 per cent.

The Coalition is leading Labor on a two-party preferred basis, 51 per cent to 49 per cent.

The poll also shows public support for Australia's involvement in Afghanistan is still lukewarm, with 49 per cent of people opposed.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/10/25/3046900.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2010 03:58 pm
Anyone else see John Howard on Q&A last night?
Any comments?
I didn't see it. Watching now.
(Link below):


Quote:

Howard faces Hicks, dodges shoes on Q&A

Updated 30 minutes ago

John Howard fronted an at times irate audience on ABC 1's Q&A program last night, facing questions on the major issues that defined his time as prime minister.

The wide-ranging interview focused heavily on the more controversial aspects of Mr Howard's tenure, with questions on the Iraq War, children overboard affair, Indigenous policy and his relationship with Peter Costello dominating the program.

At times the tension in the room was palpable, with an audience member throwing his shoes at Mr Howard while the former prime minister was defending his decision to send Australian troops to Iraq. ...<cont>

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/10/25/3047941.htm

Howard Q&A video:
http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s3041749.htm?clip=rtmp://cp44823.edgefcs.net/ondemand/flash/tv/streams/qanda/qanda_2010_ep38.flv
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2010 04:05 pm
@msolga,
I must admit I did not watch the full 53 minutes, focusing instead on the shoe thing. The guy did not throw very well, it seems to me.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2010 05:24 pm
@realjohnboy,
Yep. That guy was a definitely bad shot. Wink

But I have to say that I found the program fascinating, RJB. (Maybe you have to be Australian & to have been caught up with the politics of the time.) I also found it pretty aggravating quite a bit of the time. Found myself saying "But, but, but, BUT ...!" quite a bit.

The thing that struck me was that Howard has learnt absolutely nothing since being voted out of office. He has no regrets about anything, he cannot admit that he ever did a thing wrong. (Which probably explains why he was so resoundingly defeated at election, even lost his own seat ...)

He sat there and admitted that "the majority of Australians never supported the war in Iraq", but still believes he was right about involving us in that invasion. (Quite amazing, given everything we now know.) He still doesn't regret not saying "sorry" to the Stolen Generation of aboriginal Australians, he denies that "children over-board" was a deliberate lie, a scare campaign, which won him an election, he still denies responsibility for David Hicks languishing in Guantanamo Bay for 51/5 years, when he, (unlike the British did with their citizens) could have extracted him, if he wasn't such a sycophantic supporter of Bush & co. ... etc, etc, etc ...

As I say, it was a quite fascinating, but a maddening Q&A at the same time. A politician who hasn't learnt a solitary thing after 3 years out of office, believes everything he did as prime minister was correct & is completely unable or unwilling to regret or question a single thing that he did!









msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2010 06:12 pm
@msolga,
A letter to the editor from my morning paper today.
Pretty much the same as my thoughts on Howard's response to the question about our role in the Iraq invasion on Q&A last night.
I guess all those civilian deaths & the suffering of the Iraqi people are just collateral damage, minor details in Howard's bigger picture of his leadership? Neutral :


Quote:
No remorse on Iraq for man of steel

I CAN'T wait to read John Howard's memoir to see whether it will continue his obfuscation over the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

How opportune that the secret US field reports have come to light, providing graphic details of civilian deaths resulting from the invasion (WikiLeaks vows more revelations'', The Age, 25/10). From 2004 to 2009, violent civilian deaths exceeded 100,000. This figure is consistent with the latest data from Iraq Body Count, a London-based group founded in 2003 to ensure the human consequences of the intervention were not neglected. IBC's figures, a record of actual documented deaths, puts civilian deaths since March 2003 at more than 122,000, and total violent deaths at more than 150,000.

Despite this horrendous carnage, at no stage can I recall our ''man of steel'' expressing remorse or compassion for the Iraqi people - unlike when he invoked Australians to feel for the more than 3000 innocent victims of September 11, 2001. Howard seemed to suspend his capacity for disbelief after September 11, pledging absolute loyalty and slavish devotion to George Bush.

I suspect Howard's memoir will preach the same demagoguery and misinformation concerning Iraq, proof of his complicity in and unwillingness to confront the reality of the invasion. Iraq today is a country destroyed and demoralised by defeat and civil war, but unlike George Bush and Tony Blair, Howard, incredibly, is still to face political retribution for his folly.

Neil Hudson, Hawthorn


http://www.theage.com.au/national/letters/dodgy-builders-are-home-free-20101025-170sk.html
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Oct, 2010 11:56 pm
@msolga,
I couldn't bring myself to watch it. Glad to hear that he is still convinced he never got anything wrong, now I'll have no second thoughts about dancing on his grave.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 12:14 am
@hingehead,
It was actually very interesting, hinge. Seriously. (A number of those online text commentators described it as the best Q&A program of the year.)

(I didn't retch, or get violently ill, or anything! Wink )

And it was pretty amazing that David Hicks got to ask questions of Howard on the ABC! (Amongst other things.)

I do know how you feel, hinge.
I just think we can't afford to forget history.
Watching him last night, he was so much a leader of the past.

0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 06:34 am
Laughing

(actually I had a bit of sympathy with what he had to say. Call me strange.
So did the Greens. Call them strange, too! Wink )


http://images.theage.com.au/2010/11/01/2019244/petty-marx-600x400.jpg
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 06:48 am
@msolga,
One does wonder why banks around the world had to be bailed out while ours make massive profits.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 06:54 am
@hingehead,
Well obviously ours are far better, hinge!!! Wink
But our government did underwrite them & if they had had experienced any major debt problems it would have cost us ...

Do you like Petty's cartoon?
It made me laugh.
Talk about identity confusion!
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 07:33 am
Interesting.
A push to regain some of those lost left Labor supporters?
A push from the left of the party to wrestle back some control from the NSW Right?
Surely Labor has learned a thing or two since the last election?:


Quote:
Poll-driven Labor urged to return to basic values
Michelle Grattan
November 3, 2010/the AGE


FEDERAL cabinet minister Greg Combet has warned Labor not to subordinate good policy to focus group research and declared Labor must rebuild its reputation as ''the party of progress''.


''We have a responsibility to lead, not follow,'' he said.

Mr Combet, from the Left, was buying into a hot Labor debate. The Right of the NSW Labor Party in particular has been accused of being focus-group driven.

He said focus groups and polling had a role to play, noting they were crucial to the success of the union campaign against WorkChoices, which he spearheaded before the 2007 election.

''However, they cannot have primacy - they simply inform strategy and how to promote policies and win support for them. They cannot compel the party to abandon its values,'' he said, launching All That's Left: What Labor Should Stand For, by Nick Dyrenfurth and Tim Soutphommasane.

He said that at this year's election, the ALP received its fourth-lowest primary vote since the beginning of the two-party system in 1910. While the swing on primary votes to the Coalition was constrained to 1.5 per cent, Labor lost 4 per cent of its primary vote to the Greens. ''This has caused a significant amount of soul-searching - and it should.''

The criticism that Labor didn't stand for anything was unfair, but ''perhaps what we failed to do was to make sure that the people grasped what drives us, what our values are, and what differentiates us from both the Coalition and the Greens.

''Labor must rebuild its standing, its reputation as the party of progress, as the party that cares.'' In rebuilding, Labor had to draw on its core values - equity, social justice and compassion.

Mr Combet, the Minister for Climate Change, said Labor lost votes to the left, some caused by the deferral of the emissions trading scheme. ''This has brought into focus the tension between policy principles and pragmatic politics.''

Labor would operate a successful minority government if it was guided by enduring Labor values, he said. Three of its signature reforms showed Labor's commitment to those values: the national broadband network, the increase in compulsory superannuation to 12 per cent, and the response to climate change.

''If we are successful in implementing these reforms, then this government can rightly take its place among the great reformist Commonwealth governments, such as the governments of Fisher, Curtin, Chifley, Whitlam, Hawke and Keating. In the process, we will successfully reclaim ownership of the term reform for social democracy.'


http://www.theage.com.au/national/polldriven-labor-urged-to-return-to-basic-values-20101102-17ce7.html
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 07:34 am
@msolga,
It got a smile out of me, except I'm not a huge fan of Hockey's. Hey Olgs, I always appreciate your cartoon mining - have you ever found an online source for Rowe's cartoons - those little bizarrsterpieces?
http://www.slq.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/image/0016/152116/Rowe.jpg

I'm not sure even what paper's he's in.

I also like David Pope, because I knew him when he was nothing! Good union man.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 07:52 am
@hingehead,
Quote:
I'm not a huge fan of Hockey's.

No, me neither.
I would have thought Labor might have taken a bit of interest in the issue, though. It was good someone spoke up. Even if it was Hockey.
But I get mighty annoyed with the banks & their unreasonable rate rises. I would love to see a bit of genuine competition for a change. They've had a very easy ride since deregulation. (I still naively dream of the reestablishment of something resembling a "peoples bank". We wuz robbed! Wink )

Quote:
have you ever found an online source for Rowe's cartoons - those little bizarrsterpieces?

No. But I'm definitely interested.
Where did you find this one, hinge?

Quote:
I also like David Pope, because I knew him when he was nothing! Good union man.interested.

Tell me about (or show me) something by David Pope. If you can.
I'm interested in him, too.
I think our mainstream cartoonists seem to be getting rather tired & jaded. That's why I don't post nearly as much of their work these days. Or perhaps there's simply not the wealth of material as say, during Howard's term in office?
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2010 08:43 am
@msolga,
I found David Rowe by searching for him in Google Images

I found these Pope's the same way (apparently he uses 'Hinze' as a nom de plume. I hired him to do some cartoony posters for the library I worked back then. I think he was just starting to freelance (mid 90s) I think he did work for the Green Left Weekly or whatever the Workers Party organ was back then.

http://www.cartoonists.gr/UserFiles/Citation%20-%20David%20Pope_big.jpg

http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/David%20Pope%20Iraq%20cartoon%20Inkspot.jpg
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 03:39:04