@realjohnboy,
Quote:Far be it from me to judge, but it seems to me that the 30% is a decent deal. Rudd's 40% was probably a shot across the bow to get the mining companies attention.
Oh I think Rudd (plus the caucus, including Julia G, Wayne Swan, etc ..) was deadly serious, RJB.
Many Labor reforms depended on the anticipated mining tax revenue. (The trouble was, it wasn't sold at all well to the Oz electorate by Rudd & Swan. And also, there was a humongous "scare campaign" run by the mining companies. Which severely undermined Labor's chances at the coming election.) Adjustments will now have to be made.
Quote:Smaller firms are exempt.
The big companies have looked after their own interests in the very recent negations. Smaller companies have (apparently) copped a deal they may not be at all happy with. There has already been something of a backlash from the smaller companies. (which are by far the majority.) I'm not too clear on the details, but will check them out as they are made clearer.
Quote:It seems to me that Labor will now call an election sooner rather than later to try to ride the wave of this. When might that be?
Absolutely. Labor's best chance is an election ASAP! (It was necessary to clear the "mining tax" issue before the campaign, to avoid any further undermining influence from the extremely powerful mining interests. Now that they have a deal, Labor will announce an election for the soonest possible date. There is much talk of late August. I'd be surprised it we didn't have the election date before the weekend is over.