2
   

If you were a bookie... Polls and bets on the 2004 elections

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:12 am
ICR/International Communications Research poll. Sept. 24-28, 2004, compared to a little over two weeks ago:

2-way, likely voters:
Bush 51% (-1)
Kerry 43% (-1)

2-way, registered voters:
Bush 50% (+1)
Kerry 43% (-2)

3-way, likely voters:
Bush 51% (no ch.)
Kerry 41% (-3)
Nader 2% (-1)

3-way, registered voters:
Bush 48% (no ch.)
Kerry 41% (-3)
Nader 3% (no ch.)

Also available is a new Democracy Corps poll, but I can't read it (my computer won't reinstall Acrobat Reader). But Daly says it's:

Bush 49
Kerry 46

Previous one was Bush 49 / Kerry 49.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:26 am
georgeob1 wrote:
I believe the earlier piece you quoted, which purported to show that those with more education tend to favor Kerry in proportion to the amount of education they received, was presented by its author to advance his own beliefs, rather than as a dispassionate observation.

Unlikely. It's from the pollster's own press release. And Harris isn't known for any particular partisanness, as far as I know. (But they did get the 2000 race closer than anyone else.)

georgeob1 wrote:
A good deal depends on where, and in what disciplines, one takes his sample of educated people [..]

I would assume that polls usually ensure that their samples are regionally representative ... that the number of people they call in the West, South etc correlate with overall voter proportions. Don't know, actually - but one would bloody well hope so, no?

georgeob1 wrote:
[..] and as you know sampling error grows as one drills doun into subsets of the data taken.

That's a good point - subsets are notoriously less reliable than the overall numbers. I hope so, because personally I would consider it very bad news for the Democratic Party if this were true. One might derive a certain condescension from being the party of the higher educated, but that doesn't yield you much politically.

IMO, for the Democratic Party to lose its working class electorate (I know you don't use that term in America, but you know what I mean) is not just very tricky politically, it should also be reason to shame one's eyes out, as we say here.

georgeob1 wrote:
I have a PhD, and I most certainly do not favor John Kerry.

Heh. I'm afraid that doesn't signify much, statistically ... ;-)
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 04:49 am
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 4:05 am Post subject: ELECTORAL COLLEGE POLL TALLY

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest compilation of state by state electoral vote tally shows

Bush: 291
Kerry: 208
Undecided: 54

http://www.geocities.com/samboni1342/state_polls.htm

Hedgehog shows an even greater margin for Bush when Nader is included.

http://www.geocities.com/hedgehogreport/bushkerry2004state.html

I anticipate more undecideds will go for Bush after tonight's debate.

What do you think?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 05:34 am
I believe the debates are a bit of a wild card. Kerry has obviously been working hard on the logic of his opposition to Bush's foreign policies and adventures. He has, as a minimum, come up with some formulations less laughably self-serving and more persuasive than those he has used in the past. When he stops the narcissistic posturing he can also be quite effective as a debator. Bush, as we all know, is rhetorically challenged - at best he is OK in that area.

Despite the general slow, but steady decline in support for Kerry, it is reasonably likely that he could pick up some detrectable support as a result of the debates. Intuitively, I believe the erosion of Kerry's support has more or less levelled off, and he is at a new quasi equilibium about 5-6% behind Bush. Kerry could reduce that margin in the debates.

I still predict a Bush win with a 5% margin.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 05:47 am
We shall see Gbob.

So many watching the debate will form their opinion on not what the candidates say, but on how they say it.

Bush came across in the O'Reilly interviews as a man who knows and is comfortable with who he is and that he is certain of his course.

I am not sure Kerry is capable of that, but am sure his handlers are coaching him to come across as such. If he does, it will be a dramatic change for him.

My Mother-in-Law is a lifelong Republican, but she does not like Bush because he struts and smirks too much in her opinion.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 09:34 am
It was amusing and instructive hearing the Fox and Friends group interview the "Kerry stand in" who is helping coach Bush for the debate tonight. He envies the person operating as the Bush stand in as that person only had to prepare for one position on any given issue. The Kerry stand in had to study and prepare for up to eight different positions on some issues and at least more than one on all.

Fox and Friends made the point they had invited the Kerry campaign's Bush stand in to speak to the debates tonight too, but he declined.

After that one press conference in which the liberal media blindsided Bush badly, I don't think he'll let that happen in this debate. I look for him to be prepared and ready for anything Kerry can throw at him. I expect him to come across as more credible. I think the Bush team is pretty confident there too since they've agree to more debates than would normally be prudent for the sitting president.

I predict no worse than a draw; am guessing Bush will get the edge and that Bush will get a small bump upwards in the polls.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:04 am
Disregarding the MOE of individual polls, let alone of survey questions within them, one is struck by the overall tenor and clear trending both of the headline "Who's Ahead" numbers and of those internals, across all the major polls; Bush/Republicans continually increase most leads held since the conventions, and eat into leads held by Kerry/Democrats, while Kerry/Democrats have notched no gains, not even on internal questions for which Bush/Republicans have recorded softening.

Particularly interesting is that regarding Iraq/The War on Terror/Homeland Security, on which Kerry seems to have decided to focus, support for Bush/Republicans has been trending upward in the face of the all-but-incessant post-convention/pre-debate Kerry/Democrats attacks.

Equally interesting is that The Economy remains both the chief issue occupying voters' concerns and the issue on which Bush/Republicans show the most vulnerability, yet here too, while Bush/Republican support has fluctuated, even in some particulars in some polls softened, Kerry/Democrats have not picked up commensurate gains.

Perhaps most troubling for Kerry/Democrats is that on questions of character and leadership, Bush/Republicans continue to trend upward in support, at the expense of Kerry/Democrats. the "Negatives" for Kerry/Democrats trend upward, almost in lockstep with the upward trendings of Bush/Republican "Positives"

Considering The Battleground States, Kerry/Democrats not only have made no inroads into the 2000 Rebublican-leaning states, but have lost states that had leaned Gore, while in a number of states originally thought to have been safely Kerry/Democrat, Bush/Republicans have narrowed their disadvantage, putting some states into play, drawing even in others, and notching slim leads in a few.

Apart from the Top-of-The-Ticket Presidential Contest, there has been a trending in generic Congressional Preference which has not favored Kerry/Democrats. The Kerry/Democrats "Coat-tail Effect" not only appears to be non-existent, a number of Democratic legislative candidates, including perhaps most notably SD's Tom Daschle, have not embraced, or even have distanced themselves from, the Kerry campaign.

Finally, regarding prime demographics - age groups, gender split, education level, ethnicity, income level, religious preference, and conservative/liberal sentiment, among just about all others, it is evident Kerry/Democrats are losing ground both overall and as compared to the performance recorded by Gore/Democrats in the 2000 contest.

So, going into the first debate, the advantage, and the momentum, indisputably are to the Bush/Republicans side. Over the past year and more, Kerry has sought to introduce and to favorably define himself to The Electorate. Tonight, Mr. Kerry has 90 minutes in which to convince The Electorate the impression of him, and of his Party, The Electorate has gathered over the entire runup to this point is incorrect. While Bush need do no more tonight than reaffirm and maintain his standing in the mind of The Electorate, Kerry must substantially change the mind of The Electorate, redefine himself, and emerge a wholly different candidate than he so far has been perceived to be.

Yeah, sure. He can do that. I put the odds at somewhere between

http://www.scrubsrus.com/flying_pigs.jpg

and

http://www.netsearchmap.com/172.jpg

A closing note - Watch for the Mainstream Media to press, almost desperately so, the idea Kerry "Won" the debate. It is to their interest to maintain the concept of "Close Race" ... foregone conclusions don't sell headlines.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:06 am
Quote:
A closing note - Watch for the Mainstream Media to press, almost desperately so, the idea Kerry "Won" the debate. It is to their interest to maintain the concept of "Close Race" ... foregone conclusions don't sell headlines.


Great comment. Really sets you up for a win-win, doesn't it?

If Bush wins the debate, it's obvious that he meant to. If he loses, the media is only saying so to keep things close.

Nice out ya have there.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:12 am
Don't see that as an "Out" at all, Cyc ... I see it as reinforcement of the charge of Liberal Media Bias, and as symptomatic of the credibility decline suffered of late by Mainstream Media. They don't get it. Kerry/Democrats don't get it. The Electorate is not with them.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:13 am
Here's the real problem with Bush supporters.

The vast majority of them don't know what the hell they are voting for.

http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_04/html/new_9_29_04.html

(Empahsis is mine)
Quote:
Bush Supporters Misread Many of His Foreign Policy Positions

Kerry Supporters Largely Accurate

Swing Voters Also Misread Bush, But Not Kerry

As the nation prepares to watch the presidential candidates debate foreign policy issues, a new PIPA-Knowledge Networks poll finds that Americans who plan to vote for President Bush have many incorrect assumptions about his foreign policy positions. Kerry supporters, on the other hand, are largely accurate in their assessments. The uncommitted also tend to misperceive Bush's positions, though to a smaller extent than Bush supporters, and to perceive Kerry's positions correctly. Steven Kull, director of PIPA, comments: "What is striking is that even after nearly four years President Bush's foreign policy positions are so widely misread, while Senator Kerry, who is relatively new to the public and reputed to be unclear about his positions, is read correctly."

Majorities of Bush supporters incorrectly assumed that Bush favors including labor and environmental standards in trade agreements (84%), and the US being part of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (69%), the International Criminal Court (66%), the treaty banning land mines (72%), and the Kyoto Treaty on global warming (51%). They were divided between those who knew that Bush favors building a new missile defense system now (44%) and those who incorrectly believe he wishes to do more research until its capabilities are proven (41%). However, majorities were correct that Bush favors increased defense spending (57%) and wants the US, not the UN, to take the stronger role in developing Iraq's new government (70%).

Kerry supporters were much more accurate in assessing their candidate's positions on all these issues. Majorities knew that Kerry favors including labor and environmental standards in trade agreements (90%); the US being part of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (77%); the International Criminal Court (59%); the land mines treaty (79%); and the Kyoto Treaty on climate change (74%). They also knew that he favors continuing research on missile defense without deploying a system now (68%), and wants the UN, not the US, to take the stronger role in developing Iraq's new government (80%). A plurality of 43% was correct that Kerry favors keeping defense spending the same, with 35% assuming he wants to cut it and 18% to expand it.

Many of the uncommitted (those who say they are not very sure which candidate they will vote for) also misread Bush's position on most issues, though in most cases this was a plurality, not a majority. The uncommitted incorrectly believed that Bush favors including labor and environmental standards in trade agreements (69%), the US being part of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (51%), the International Criminal Court (47% to 31%), the land mines treaty (50%), and the Kyoto treaty on global warming (45% to 37%). Only 35% knew that Bush favors building a new missile defense system now, while 36% incorrectly believed he wishes to do more research until its capabilities are proven, and 22% did not give an answer. Only 41% knew that Bush favors increased defense spending, while 49% incorrectly assumed he wants to keep it the same (29%) or cut it (20%). A plurality of 46% was correct that Bush wants the US, rather than the UN, to take the stronger role in developing Iraq's new government (37% assumed the UN).

<< RESUME READING >>

The uncommitted were much more accurate in assessing Kerry's positions. Majorities knew that Kerry favors including labor and environmental standards in trade agreements (75%), and the US being part of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (60%), the land mines treaty (57%), and the Kyoto Treaty on global warming (54%), and wants the US, not the UN, to take the lead in developing Iraq's new government (71%). Pluralities correctly assumed that Kerry favors US participation in the International Criminal Court (49 to 30%) and that he favors doing more research until its effectiveness is proven (46%), with 26% assuming he does not want to build a system at all). Thirty-nine percent correctly assumed that he wants to keep defense spending the same, but 36% assumed that he wants to cut it.

PIPA selected these questions from those asked in polls by the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations which dealt with issues on which the presidential candidates have taken clear and documented positions.

Two other issues, on which neither candidate's position can be definitively established, were also explored. One was in regard to how the US should deal with the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Bush supporters were divided about whether Bush favored taking Israel's side (43%) or taking neither side (45%), while the uncommitted leaned toward the view that Bush favored taking neither side (47%) more than taking Israel's side (30%). Kerry voters mostly assumed that Kerry favored taking neither side (68%), as did swing voters (58%).

On the question of whether, as a general rule, the US should contribute troops to UN peacekeeping operations, Bush supporters assumed that Bush would favor doing so (78%) as did Kerry supporters (58%) and a majority of the uncommitted (60%). Kerry supporters (73%) also assume that he would favor contributing to peacekeeping as do a bare majority of the uncommitted (51%). However, a plurality of Bush supporters (48%) assumes that Kerry would prefer to leave the job to other countries.

The poll was conducted with a nationwide sample of 959 respondents over September 8-12. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.2-4.0%, depending on whether the question was administered to two-thirds or the entire sample. A report and the questionnaire can be found at www.pipa.org.

The poll was fielded by Knowledge Networks using its nationwide panel, which is randomly selected from the entire adult population and subsequently provided internet access. For more information about this methodology, go to www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp.

Funding for this research was provided by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.



It's no surprise to me that a majority of Bush supporters don't have a clue what Bush himself supports. This election is more like a high school popularity contest than it is a thoughtful, insightful process of picking a leader to run the country.

Great job, Republicans!

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:25 am
"Here's the real problem with Bush supporters.

The vast majority of them don't know what the hell they are voting for."

It is not rocket science. The majority of us, IMO, are voting for Bush because the Dems once again failed to provide what we view as a credible alternative in Flipflop Kerry.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:26 am
That doesn't change the fact that you are dealing with a voter base that doesn't have a clue what issues they are supporting.

That should tell you something about these people...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:27 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That doesn't change the fact that you are dealing with a voter base that doesn't have a clue what issues they are supporting.

That should tell you something about these people...

Cycloptichorn


Pure speculation...but you are entitled to do that.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:29 am
I disagree with both Larryand Cyclop here. I think the vast majority of Bush supporters know exactly what they want from the president and the government and know that Bush is aligned with at least some of what they want and is trustworthy to stay with a position once he adopts one.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:32 am
That directly contradicts the findings of the survey, Fox...

Larry, RTFA before you call it 'speculation' that many (if not a majority of) Bush supporters don't know what his own policies are.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:34 am
Different subject, not sure where to put it but here seems as good as anywhere -- Nader won't be in the race in Ohio. Too many signatures were forged. That could be big, IF Nader voters vote for Kerry. (Nader had been polling around 2%.)
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:35 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That directly contradicts the findings of the survey, Fox...

Larry, RTFA before you call it 'speculation' that many (if not a majority of) Bush supporters don't know what his own policies are.

Cycloptichorn


I know you believe the majority of the electorate to be uninformed. You may be right but I disagree with such a blanket indictment.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:35 am
http://www.columbusdispatch.com/election/election-president.php?story=dispatch/2004/09/29/20040929-A1-00.html
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:36 am
Cyc, "The Real Problem" is that Kerry/Democrats have not provided The Electorate with a preferable alternative, plain-and-simple. "Different" is not "Better", and for a challenger to unseat an incumbent, it is nescessary in the absolute to convey to The Electorate a clearly defined set of generally recognized and acknowledged ills attending upon the incumbent administration and to provide distinct, realistic, achievable remedies thereto. This Kerry/Democrats to this point have not done. Tonight they have the opportunity - likely their sole opportunity - to redress that failing, and to effect a paradigm shift in the course of The Electorate's sentiment over the next month. In 90 minutes, Kerry must undo over a year's worth of the impressions he has made on The Electorate, and translate that reversal into a commitment of The Electorate to vote FOR] Kerry as opposed to merely maintaining himself as championing those already given to the sentiment of "Anybody But Bush".
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 10:39 am
Forget about Kerry for the moment, Timber.

Kerry has nothing to do with the fact that the majority of Republicans don't know where their candidate stands on a wide range of foreign policy issues, according to the survey.

It is interesting that Kerry, who is seen as a flip-flopper by you, seems to have supporters who are much more able to identify his position.

This, of course, comes as no surprise to me. I'm not saying there aren't Bush supporters who know their stuff; but the majority of them just want to feel safe, because they are scared. Scared people. They couldn't give a damn about issues. It's sad, really.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Oz fest 2004 - Question by Love2is0evol
Human Events Names Man of the Year, 2004 - Discussion by gungasnake
Your 2004 mix tape - Discussion by boomerang
BUSH WON FAIR AND SQUARE... - Discussion by Frank Apisa
Weeping and gnashing of teeth - Discussion by FreeDuck
WOW! Why Andrew Sullivan is supporting John Kerry - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
Margarate Hassan - hostage in Iraq - Discussion by msolga
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 09/22/2024 at 12:26:49