1
   

Dialectics of existence

 
 
borisbv
 
Reply Tue 17 Mar, 2009 07:03 pm
Preface

Let me show my cards at once and explain the purpose of this work. My only goal is to prove that apart our world there exists another world, which is an absolute foundation for the universe and it has mind. I understand that it is a very easily statement but I am totally sure in this idea, and in order to prove it, it is necessary to define the very basic concepts.
First of all we need to define the concepts of dialectics and existence. According to dictionary, dialectics is a very awkward conception to be defined, its definition changed with the course of time – from defining it as a teaching about eternal formation and variability of existence (Heraclitus), skill of dialogue, achievement of truth by opposition of opinions (Socrates), method of separation and binding of concepts with the purpose of comprehension of ideal essence of things (Plato) according to ancient Greeks, doctrine of unity of oppositions according to medieval scientists and up to a method of reality perception and its revolutionary transformation as per Marx. So yet we do not have finally any exact definition of what dialectics is even from dictionary. In order to make a settlement with this issue, let’s take the golden mean – dialectics is a unity and interaction of oppositions.
Then we have the other issue, which looks easier to define (at least as per dictionary). “Existence is the philosophical category identifying reality existing objectively. It is not reduced only to material-objective world, existence possesses of various levels: organic and inorganic nature, biosphere, social being, objective-ideal life (values of culture, generally valid principles and categories of scientific knowledge, etc.), life of a person”. This definition is also not exact as the previous one, but for our purpose we may compose a basic definition – existence is a universal being which includes all forms of material and ideal displays of universal life.
Now, when all basic concepts are practically defined, let’s investigate everything step by step.



Contents

1. Universe, its properties and its paradoxes
2. Another world and its possible properties
3. Mysteries of life and evolution
4. Mind and dialectics of existence









1. Universe, its properties and its paradoxes

We live in a very strange and paradoxical world. First, we do not exist. How could it be so? Long time ago, in ancient Greece, Zeno of Elea claimed that nothing could really change or move; moreover nothing could exist because our world is a single whole. He claimed it since the unified thing cannot move or change. But the real world proves the opposite, so do we have an undecidable contradiction? In addition his teacher Parmenides insisted that there could not be non-existence at all, since it is not even imaginable. According to modern teachings, the foundation for entire matter in our world is the vacuum, which is also can be defined as nothing or non-existence. How can we solve these paradoxes?
Well, we have to admit that we live not only in paradoxical world but also in the world full of contradictions. And those contradictions have been noticed long time ago, already in ancient world. That’s why such philosophers as Parmenides and Zeno paid so much attention to paradoxes. They tried to explain them but failed. In later times scientists studied physical phenomena and considered that their absolute cause lies in divine sphere. Even modern materialistic science deals only with consequences of natural phenomena, and we cannot find any explanations of their origin in any scientific book. All we can be satisfied with is only descriptions of such natural phenomena as light, gravity, energy and so on. But what they really are - nobody can explain. Such situation exists long time and becomes worse more and more as scientific data accumulates. Now we have a very strange situation – a lot of scientific data, its description, but no slightest idea of its origin.
So we may conclude from the above that there exist limits for perception of some natural phenomena. Limitation of human knowledge implies in boundedness of sphere of cognizable material world. There are two main reasons for such limitation. First, deviation of truth in mind conclusion arises during extrapolation of known scientific conceptions of matter and energy transformations into such domains of time and space that are not accessible for analysis. Second, human thinking is limited by its own nature. Religious thinkers claim that human strive for logical explanation of all natural phenomena inevitably leads to moving off the truth and to belittling Creator’s role. According to religion God’s nature is inaccessible, concealed and unimaginable. But we may consider this assertion relating mostly to a spiritual side of human perception and there still might be a hope for a logical knowledge of universal laws. First of all it is necessary to define the limits of the universe itself.
What are the recognizable limits of the universe? Though the universe is considered limitless there are still limits for our attempts to research it. The limits for our penetration into secrets of the universe exist in two directions – in microcosm and in macrocosm. The biggest objects of macrocosm are the galaxies of many light years in diameter that scattered in space over billions of light years and exist billions of years. The smallest objects of microcosm are elementary particles that can be hardly registered due to their tiny dimensions and they exist just moments. As biggest objects so smallest ones constantly move, interact and located in vacuum. It is interesting coincidence and we may suppose that the universe has its limits just in vacuum. We may also surmise that the universe is closed in vacuum by itself like Mobius band. So in order to define limits of the universe we have to define the concept of vacuum.
What are the basic properties of vacuum? According to latest scientific data vacuum is the lowest energetic state of quantum field. The average number of particles - quanta of the field is equal to zero; although there may be produced virtual particles in vacuum, which affect physical processes (it is discovered in experiments). So we may suppose that the vacuum is not only a foundation for entire matter of the universe, but it is also the main source for production of matter, i.e. vacuum produces all necessary elementary particles for all substances of the world. At this point we have to pay attention to one more paradox or contradiction. And this contradiction is rather fundamental, because it relates to the problem mentioned above. We again cannot understand the origin of those forces that bring vacuum to produce particles. And if we trend to materialistic belief in accidental nature of universal processes, the problem of our world origin would never be solved. Let’s get rid of such belief as barren and false one at once and never use it hereinafter.
So if we agree that no processes in vacuum can occur accidentally we have to admit that they arise purposefully and deliberately. Indignant cry of materialists at its climax – it is impossible! But how can we explain all subsequent processes in the world? We’ve just touched the very initial process – birth of virtual particles that cannot be still registered by any instruments, but they evidently affect physical processes, which can be already registered. And as we continue that succession of subsequent natural processes we’ll get through formation of elementary particles, atoms, molecules, and inevitably come to the most complex and sophisticated process in the world – to the life. Again we are in doubt, because we still cannot tell anything definite of life. Science cannot define life itself at all; there is only definition for live forms but no slightest idea of life itself.
This situation with absence of definition for such fundamental natural phenomena as light, energy, gravity and life is not accidental. We will be never able to solve this problem and never guess any secrets of the universe if we would search for solution in our world. At first sight it is rather strange conclusion, but we have to remember that all processes of the universe start just in vacuum. Some may object to it – vacuum is the part of our world. It is so and it is not at the same time. We have one more paradox here. We may consider vacuum as a part of our world insofar as it is the space for all objects of the universe - from elementary particles to the galaxies, but vacuum itself cannot be defined as an object of the universe. Do you remember Zeno’s assertion that a single whole cannot exist? We may apply that assertion to vacuum realistically, because vacuum is a single whole, moreover it is not moving, but as we know from school program - matter cannot exist without movement. We have to admit that vacuum itself isn’t a matter and it is a very strange and mysterious entity. It isn’t an object or a matter, and maybe it is a field? But according to the above definition number of particles of quantum field in vacuum is equal to zero, i.e. nothing. So none of those concepts can be applied to vacuum. And now it is time to set up a new hypothesis.







2. Another world and its possible properties

Nobody likes hypotheses, especially if they are ill-founded. This is quite understandable, but we have to remember that entire progress of science was founded on nothing but hypotheses. We have a lot of problems in modern science, many paradoxes and contradictions hinder our progress to the truth, and we have to apply again the well-proven method of research – hypothesis, and let me assure you that my hypothesis won’t be ill-founded.
We have come to a deadlock at the end of the first part of our discussion and now we urgently need some help. This might be the hypothesis of another world. Materialists cry again – idealistic nonsense! We can reply to that cry at once – no, it is not. Why can we be so sure? It is rather simple – nothing and nobody may forbid the existence of one more dimension in addition to the three known ones. Such assumption is quite usual in mathematics, so why we cannot apply same idea to physical world. Some people still believe that time is the fourth dimension. Such fallacy may be disproved very easily. Though time is considered as a part of space-time continuum, it cannot be accounted the part of space as simple dimensional entity. The essence of time is process, without process there would never be any slightest idea of time. But vacuum itself is the space by its own nature, therefore it may be reasonably considered as a part of fourth dimension.
What advantage can we get from such assumption? There are many of them, and the most obvious and helpful is that the concept of fourth dimension in relation to vacuum allows considering it as the other world with its own laws. Why do we need it? Because we need to solve all listed above problems, which cannot be explained by any processes of our world. So we may consider vacuum as a part of another world with its own properties. What are these properties? Of course we may just suppose such properties because another world is still inaccessible for observation. All we can be surely certain of that the properties of another world shall be opposite to those of the universe.
We have already agreed that vacuum is a single whole, therefore the opposite of that property is the multiplicity of the universe, which is well known and nobody can argue about that. Multiplicity of the universe implies the presence of multiple objects that constantly move in space during time. So we may add to multiplicity of the universe its other properties – time and space that interact in the movement of matter but not equal to each other as we noted above. The opposite property to time and space can be their absence, so we may suppose that in another world of vacuum there is no time and space. Materialists would tear us into little pieces for such assumption, but let’s be specific. We know that vacuum is a single whole, which cannot move, and we also know that time can exist only in process, i.e. in movement, therefore there is no time in another world of vacuum.
And what about space? In fact, we have decided that vacuum is the space for all objects of the universe. Well, do we have one more paradox? It could be a paradox for our world but not for another one. In spite of the fact that we have decided that vacuum is the space for all objects of the universe we may also consider it as a non-space entity. How could coexist such opposite things? It is very easy – vacuum is not another world itself, it is just an intermediate stage between the universe and another world. That’s why vacuum can play such strange and contradictory role in display of properties of two opposite worlds.
In addition to such fantastic properties as absence of time and space we have to add another property of not less fantastic capacity. We know that vacuum also produces virtual particles by its own fluctuations and starts thereby all processes in the universe. We have decided that such processes starting in vacuum cannot be accidental, and they are surely purposeful and deliberate. How could those processes be purposeful and resultant without intelligent control? The answer for such basic question could be only one – it is impossible. If all processes of the universe start in the vacuum then the intelligent control over them shall originate from the vacuum as well. Therefore we may suppose that vacuum has one more fantastic property – ability to control starting process of all further events of the universe. How can we claim it is a question of all events of the universe? Because it is quite understandable – none of the processes in the universe can occur without use of substances consisting of molecules, atoms, elementary particles that originate, as we remember, from virtual particles born in vacuum fluctuations, so the whole process of universal life depends on vacuum and its fluctuations under intelligent control.
Now we need to understand how the entire emptiness, what the vacuum actually is, can produce not only any particles but make it also with such mighty intellect without creating chaos in all further cycles of substances transformations. But we need to comprehend it with regard to all aspects of universal life otherwise the least deviation from real picture of the world could make it a mess. In order to achieve this we should recognize that the vacuum has intellect in its own nature. This time materialists wouldn’t cry indignantly, they just note with ironical smile that such idea had already existed even in ancient Greece. Anaxagoras set up a hypothesis of imperishable elements – seeds of substances, and claimed that driving principle of world system is mind (Nus) that organizes elements. It is a very interesting idea but we need to advance using modern scientific data, which Anaxagoras of course did not have. First of all he did not know that only human beings and higher mammal posses intellect and there is no any other intelligent elements apart them in the universe. So why can we extend such ability to vacuum? Because vacuum is not the part of the universe and due to its properties listed above.
We have already decided that the vacuum itself is not the other world but it is an intermediate stage between both worlds. So we may suppose that vacuum belongs to all four dimensions, in three of which there exists the universe and the fourth one belongs to another world. Hence all those fantastic properties of the vacuum originate from and belong to another world and it is not surprising that we cannot register its existence in the universe by any means, because it does not exist for us. We may suspect of its presence by indirect attributes appeared in vacuum and becoming visible for us due to its being space for all objects of the universe. How intellectual control of another world acts through all levels of organized matter of the universe? We will be not able to understand it if we would start our investigation from the initial point of control – vacuum, we may just start our research from the other end of that series of another world’s intellectual control - from living beings.


3. Mysteries of life and evolution

We have already noted that science has not yet uncovered the mystery of life. The main problem of life mystery is impossibility to understand how all those different nonliving elements collect together in such amazing organized systems as living organisms. Until now scientists consider such organization of nonliving elements into living beings as a process of self-development. But in that case it should occur every time in the same order during the entire period of existence of live forms on the earth, i.e. for one billion years approximately. It means that birth, development and everyday existence of living beings must occur accidentally and purposefully simultaneously in evolutionary process.
Scientists may object to it – no, it is not a question of evolution, in fact modern live forms are the result of evolution, and the attributes of living organisms are transferred to its descendants through genetic code on its own. This is very smart idea but the problem is that genetic code cannot be transferred totally without deviations, and it means that evolution must continue without stopping, but we know that evolution has stopped and there are none of new live forms in nature, on the contrary there is constant decline in the number of species and that suggest only one deduction – evolution has not only stopped but it reversed backwards.
In order to understand such contradiction we have to understand first of all the contradictions of evolution itself. All species have been developed in the course of evolution during millions of years, but what was the initial force brought the entire process into necessary route of development? References of Darwinists to variability, heredity, and natural selection are explaining nothing in the key mystery – what was the initial force that activated all those processes? Materialists would insist again on self-development of living beings, but we know that development of all substances in the universe could occur only under intelligent control and the only being in the universe possessing highly developed intellect is a human being. As far as we know materialists do not believe in God, especially they would not believe in some individual’s ability for returning back to the start of evolution and activate all its processes. There is no need for that, moreover that superman should return to the very start of universe formation in order to prepare it for further evolution of living nature.
So we realize that all processes in the universe are connected with each other, and they cannot start and develop without constant intelligent control. Materialists may cry as long as they want of idealism and impossibility of such design of the world, but nobody will be able to suggest another type of the universe developing and existing at the same time without forming chaos. Thus we have to understand how these two mutually exclusive processes as development and stable existence can form the life of entire universe. We have to admit that such alternative processes can coexist only under outer super-intelligent control. Such outer intelligent control can co-ordinate all sophisticated processes in living organisms and same intelligent control managed the entire evolution of the universe brought to modern live forms as a result. The highest result of evolution is intelligent human being, and highest property of human being is his mind.



4. Mind and dialectics of existence

Mind is the biggest mystery of human being. There is no certain definition of mind in any scientific book. Most of the scientists admit with a deep regret that the mystery of human mind would never be solved. There are many reasons for such situation. First of all, we still cannot register human mind itself. We can register just very weak electric impulses coming from human brain, but it is not the mind – it is just the result of brain activity and we may say that this is only a shadow of mind and nothing more.
According to modern evolutionary science, thinking ability of human beings came to them again accidentally. Can you imagine so many accidentals? But scientists still insist that such mysterious and fantastic ability came to first human beings about forty thousand years ago accidentally as a result of evolution. We know that evolution is the purposeful process. So it means that human thinking ability has been already included in the process of evolution from the very beginning. Moreover, we also know that evolution of living matter itself was prepared by evolution of entire universe, which originates in its turn from vacuum fluctuations, and this long succession of events starts, as it was said, in another world with such fantastic property as mind.
So the circle is closed again, and we remember where was the same closing up of properties – in vacuum. Can we make one more supposition - that another world, being initial and final point of universal life and having intellectual might, provided human beings with mind purposefully and deliberately? We may answer to this question – yes, of course. Nothing can prevent us from such assertion, because the whole logical path of the above arguments results in this conclusion inevitably. Moreover, if we will accept such assertion as true and use it for solving most of modern science problems, we would be able to produce the picture of universal life much more founded and certain.
Well, what do we get as a result of all above discussions? We have a very interesting conclusion that apart our world there exists another world, which is an absolute foundation for the universe and it has mind. Another world exists in the fourth dimension and interacts with our world through the vacuum having very unusual and strange properties, which allow it to be the part of all four dimensions. All processes in the universe start in vacuum that produces virtual particles giving birth to real elementary particles and so on up to living organisms. So the entire life of the universe depends on vacuum fluctuations being of course intelligent and purposeful. The entire evolution of the universe leads inevitably to intelligent human beings, and we may contend that human being is the highest point of universal evolution. The highest property of human being is its mind. Another world, being starting point of universal development, has the same ability. So the world circle is closed up by its own, and therefore we may assert that the existence of both worlds occur due to their constant interaction and unity. And the eternal paradoxes and contradictions make up dialectics being the driving force for existence.

Boris Baksalyar
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 602 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Mar, 2009 06:22 pm
@borisbv,
Do any fishing in Turmenistan?
0 Replies
 
Theaetetus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Mar, 2009 06:33 pm
@borisbv,
This is rather dense and a lot to take in. I wouldn't know where to begin to comment. I will let it sink in a while...

By the way, this could use some spacing between paragraphs to make it easier to read.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Dialectics of existence
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 09:05:51