1
   

What is a reasonable profit?

 
 
Elmud
 
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2009 03:19 pm
Relating to business, I can only speak relative to construction related manufacturing. When estimating a service or product that you provide, there are four things to consider.

First, there are materials. This to me is the easy part. There are a certain amount of materials required to manufacture a product or to fulfill any service. You simply figure out how much materials are required, figure out the cost, and you have an exact amount of what the materials cost on a particular project.

Secondly, there is labor. This is not so easy. Labor is based on the amount of productivity accomplished in a certain amount of time. You estimate this time, and what it costs, on any particular project. The labor factor entails not only the hourly rate, but also things like workmans compensation insurance, the social security factor and health insurance of that is provided partially by the employer. So, if a man hour is say, $15.00 per hour, the actual cost may double. Depending on what percentage the workmans comp is, and other costs that are related to labor. Its not easy to establish a hard number for labor. Through time and experience you should have a good idea on how much time it takes to complete a job.

Thirdly, there is overhead. The cost of doing business. Utilities. Equiptment maintainance. Per diem costs if the job is out of town. Maybe if you have a good idea on the estimate of your labor, in regard to the time it takes to do a job, you can apply a percentage to the labor factor which will cover the cost of overhead. It is simply the amount of money that will be spent that is separate from materials and labor in completeing a project.

Fourthly, there is profit. What is a reasonable profit? What is it based on? Surely any business should be solvent, and there should be a surplus of funds to cover for any downtime. But, how much? Personally, I always considered that twenty percent was reasonable. You are already including your labor into the mix, so you are making a living. What are the reasons for profit, and what would you say is reasonable? And why?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 11,513 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
Alan McDougall
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 May, 2009 04:16 pm
@Elmud,
Elmud wrote:
Relating to business, I can only speak relative to construction related manufacturing. When estimating a service or product that you provide, there are four things to consider.

First, there are materials. This to me is the easy part. There are a certain amount of materials required to manufacture a product or to fulfill any service. You simply figure out how much materials are required, figure out the cost, and you have an exact amount of what the materials cost on a particular project.

Secondly, there is labor. This is not so easy. Labor is based on the amount of productivity accomplished in a certain amount of time. You estimate this time, and what it costs, on any particular project. The labor factor entails not only the hourly rate, but also things like workmans compensation insurance, the social security factor and health insurance of that is provided partially by the employer. So, if a man hour is say, $15.00 per hour, the actual cost may double. Depending on what percentage the workmans comp is, and other costs that are related to labor. Its not easy to establish a hard number for labor. Through time and experience you should have a good idea on how much time it takes to complete a job.

Thirdly, there is overhead. The cost of doing business. Utilities. Equiptment maintainance. Per diem costs if the job is out of town. Maybe if you have a good idea on the estimate of your labor, in regard to the time it takes to do a job, you can apply a percentage to the labor factor which will cover the cost of overhead. It is simply the amount of money that will be spent that is separate from materials and labor in completeing a project.

Fourthly, there is profit. What is a reasonable profit? What is it based on? Surely any business should be solvent, and there should be a surplus of funds to cover for any downtime. But, how much? Personally, I always considered that twenty percent was reasonable. You are already including your labor into the mix, so you are making a living. What are the reasons for profit, and what would you say is reasonable? And why?


As a Mechanical/Industrial Engineer during my working life I had to deal with the challenges you mentioned in your thread.

For any job you have to quote , so careful planning is needed, time, resources such as spares, tools labor and especially time,.

I made much use of the critical path method of preplanning a project and of course monitoring its progress from start to finish ,shuffle this to allow for that ect

You must set a labor rate for each category of workers before commencing a project. If you don't you could end up with cash flow problems

I was a planning engineer of power station boiler and turbine routine maintenance overhauls.

We build the whole project with all the factors mentioned by you, simulated on a computer critical path computer program and messed around with it virtually before commencing the huge job.

Only then six months before the project or so, did we create a budget and kept to it like clue.

Once you have a good budget you can set your profit margin and give your quote Twenty percent seems reasonable to me but then I do not reside where you do

If you re a large contractor then you should think about employing a planning engineer if you are small you can still do it yourselves , go and purchase a critical path program, now just one inexpensive CD and play around until you come up with the best fit

Profit is usually based on supply and demand, if you are the only one that can satisfy the customer in your region you can set your margin a little higher, but what is a moral profit is debatable
xris
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 04:32 am
@Alan McDougall,
It is difficult but market forces usually decide for you.It always amazes me how one craftsman can demand so much more than others.Why one drives a pickup truck and the other a Workman's limo.
It comes down to ethics again,can you charge that bit more? should you?
We are seeing so many craftsmen loosing their employment, market forces are driving down labour costs by competition.
Rainy days are here again...
Khethil
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 04:54 am
@xris,
What I've seen done a lot is a flat 20% markup (e.g., Labor Costs + 20%, Material Costs + 20%, etc). So what you'd end up with is a flat markup based on your expended resources.

What's fair? Gosh, I dunno - in my perfect world things wouldn't cost anything. If I make shoes, I'd do so and whoever needed them would get a pair. The breadmaker would make bread, but might be wearing a pair of shoes I made. The cable guy would just do his cable jobs (with a tummy full of bead from the bread maker and wearing a pair of my shoes) and on down the line.

No, I know this isn't realistic - but a cool idea I think nonetheless.
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 03:41 pm
@Khethil,
Khethil wrote:
What I've seen done a lot is a flat 20% markup (e.g., Labor Costs + 20%, Material Costs + 20%, etc). So what you'd end up with is a flat markup based on your expended resources.

What's fair? Gosh, I dunno - in my perfect world things wouldn't cost anything. If I make shoes, I'd do so and whoever needed them would get a pair. The breadmaker would make bread, but might be wearing a pair of shoes I made. The cable guy would just do his cable jobs (with a tummy full of bead from the bread maker and wearing a pair of my shoes) and on down the line.

No, I know this isn't realistic - but a cool idea I think nonetheless.

I like the idea of a barter system too K. Not realistic in this day and age but, I always admired that way of exchange.
Mr Fight the Power
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 07:23 pm
@Elmud,
First off, profit isn't really a "reasonable" thing. At least there isn't some reasonable flat rate of profit. Sure there may be reasonable calculations according to market data, but ultimately financial and economic calculations are dependent upon factors that are subjective and not reasonable. The consumer determines how much he is willing to pay, even though he must make reasonable calculations, largely because of values and desires that simply cannot be calculated reasonably. We don't eat, at least we usually don't eat because we reason that we should eat. We are just hungry.

Likewise, the supplier of products deals with certain opportunity costs, what he will have to give up to provide the products, which may be weighed reasonably against the gains of providing the products, but ultimately will be measured in "utiles" that are unreasonable.

Finally, the most important economic consideration, and it is the factor upon which capitalism hinges, is the level of risk aversion. It is simply impossible for us to be reasonable about risk aversion. We may be 100% positive of just how much risk we are taking part in, but no amount of calculation informs whether we want to take on that risk.

Ultimately, profit is what the supplier needs to expect in order to offset the risk he is taking on by the supplying the product, and there is simply no objective reasonable way to calculate this. Its intuitive.

Elmud wrote:
I like the idea of a barter system too K. Not realistic in this day and age but, I always admired that way of exchange.


I think that the barter system is entirely possible today, or at least something very similar, if it weren't for legal tender laws forcing us to use bad money.
0 Replies
 
validity
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 09:11 pm
@Elmud,
The question of what happens to the profit is built into my idea of what is reasonable. A billion dollar profit spent on community projects, is in I my books a reasonable profit. A billion dollar profit in the pockets of a few well off executives, when it could be spent on community projects, not so reasonable.
Didymos Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 09:37 pm
@validity,
I think that Validity is going in the right direction. MFtP, I see where you are coming from, but I think the initial question also contains some ethical concerns.

So, not only should we consider what the profit is used for, but also by what means the profit is achieved. What is the nature of the product, and so forth. Profit from dangerous toys is not reasonable profit, for example.

We might look at this as being bound up in the concept of "Right Livelihood"
Noble Eightfold Path - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
0 Replies
 
Mr Fight the Power
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 09:42 pm
@validity,
validity wrote:
The question of what happens to the profit is built into my idea of what is reasonable. A billion dollar profit spent on community projects, is in I my books a reasonable profit. A billion dollar profit in the pockets of a few well off executives, when it could be spent on community projects, not so reasonable.


Please explain why

---------- Post added at 11:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:42 PM ----------

Didymos Thomas wrote:
I think that Validity is going in the right direction. MFtP, I see where you are coming from, but I think the initial question also contains some ethical concerns.

So, not only should we consider what the profit is used for, but also by what means the profit is achieved. What is the nature of the product, and so forth. Profit from dangerous toys is not reasonable profit, for example.

We might look at this as being bound up in the concept of "Right Livelihood"
Noble Eightfold Path - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I am certainly approaching it from an economic point of view rather than an ethical point of view, and I will freely admit that some profit is unethical, profit from fraud, coercion, and violence, for example.

I think everyone on here from both ends of the spectrum can agree that certain banks are profiting in unfair, and, even though I hate to use the term in this context, unreasonable ways.

But I just want to defend the idea of profit in general, as it is a necessary factor in bringing products to market when and where they are needed. People often blast large profits, but they almost always fail to account for the risk involved in entrepreneurial effort.

Of course, we American's have devised a brilliant system where private profit is combined with public risk and little of what I have said really applies.
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 May, 2009 04:22 pm
@Elmud,
Ethics aside, has anyone ever heard the phrase, "a lot of a little, is better than a little of a lot." ? This use to be a practical business principle. A practical philosophy. Does that philosophy still apply?
0 Replies
 
validity
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 May, 2009 05:46 pm
@Mr Fight the Power,
Mr. Fight the Power wrote:
validity wrote:
The question of what happens to the profit is built into my idea of what is reasonable. A billion dollar profit spent on community projects, is in I my books a reasonable profit. A billion dollar profit in the pockets of a few well off executives, when it could be spent on community projects, not so reasonable.
Please explain why
A stable community provides a stable market. It would be in the interest of a company to ensure the longevity of its market by strengthing the community from which its profits are drawn.

Give back what you take.
0 Replies
 
Alan McDougall
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 May, 2009 07:30 am
@Elmud,
My grandson was involved in a skiing accident in America during 1998 he skied into a tree , injuring himself , quite badly in the abdominal region of his body

The cost for five days treatment, in a USA hospital, was $25 000, as he had no insurance my daughter his mother had to fork out R250 000 Rand the South African currency and convert it to US dollars and pay the medical expenses for him

In SA that would have cost $1 500 we still have some of the best doctors and hospitals in the world but they are all private just like the one in the US Now was the US price reasonable

Comparing $25 000 to $ 1 500 a $23 500 difference makes me think Americas are paying exorbitant fees for medical attention.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 May, 2009 08:22 am
@Alan McDougall,
Alan McDougall wrote:
My grandson was involved in a skiing accident in America during 1998 he skied into a tree , injuring himself , quite badly in the abdominal region of his body

The cost for five days treatment, in a USA hospital, was $25 000, as he had no insurance my daughter his mother had to fork out R250 000 Rand the South African currency and convert it to US dollars and pay the medical expenses for him

In SA that would have cost $1 500 we still have some of the best doctors and hospitals in the world but they are all private just like the one in the US Now was the US price reasonable

Comparing $25 000 to $ 1 500 a $23 500 difference makes me think Americas are paying exorbitant fees for medical attention.
Drugs in America are artificially high.Three time more expensive than Europe.I saw a programme about a Brit passing through America to start a charity in south America and realised the poor in America needed his help, more than the third world country he was planning to go to.I think we are so lucky we have a national health service.When peoples lives are at stake the profit motive seems rather callous to me.
Alan McDougall
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 May, 2009 02:10 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
Drugs in America are artificially high.Three time more expensive than Europe.I saw a programme about a Brit passing through America to start a charity in south America and realised the poor in America needed his help, more than the third world country he was planning to go to.I think we are so lucky we have a national health service.When peoples lives are at stake the profit motive seems rather callous to me.


That is what I think is unreasonable profit in the USA with one of the highest developed societies, you find doctors living like kings and the poor dying because they cant afford the high cost of medical insurance

(I am not sure if they have medical aid schemes like we do in South Africa) These schemes are very expensive in South Africa about $500/month for a family of two, me and my wife. So the average SA must use the still appalling state system, however quality medicine can be obtained free of charge in State clinics, it is the hospital system that is awful over here

Can the poor get free medicine from the state over in the USA??

The National Health system in England is one of the best, but here in South Africa it is so appallingly bad that a state hospital is a place to go and die,

But in the Apartheid Epoch the state hospital for the select few, that being the whites were good.

But I visted state hospitals for the African population then and the people there were all in a process of dying, for lack of any care, they just lay all over the wards, two in a single bed, many laying under beds. It reminded me of the hell Dante's Divine Comedy, it was disgusting filthy and I came out sick after seeing all this suffering

The reason I visted these hospitals , is that unlike many of my fellow privileged whites, I wanted to make a difference, help or pray or do at least something for these poor desperate folk

It is better now under the new SA regime but much must still be done to give adequate medical care to all South Africans.

Has this ever been achieved I any country I wonder Barack Obama has promised he will try to get affordable medical care for the whole USA peoples, maybe a pipe dream?

Medical doctors in the private sectors no matter where they reside are all are making immoral profits , that is my opinion
0 Replies
 
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 May, 2009 04:17 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
Drugs in America are artificially high.Three time more expensive than Europe.I saw a programme about a Brit passing through America to start a charity in south America and realised the poor in America needed his help, more than the third world country he was planning to go to.I think we are so lucky we have a national health service.When peoples lives are at stake the profit motive seems rather callous to me.
Things simply cost more than they're worth Xris. The worth, or value of something is determined by how much it cost to produce it. New homes, cost more than they're worth. New automoblies cost more than they're worth. Groceries cost more than they're worth. Clothing cost more than its worth. A bag of chips cost more than they're worth. A soda pop cost more than it is worth. Everything costs more than its worth. But, we have to have these things. We all are slaves to profit. Sad thing is, it is such a shortsighted way of doing business. If a person could take a little less, they would actually get a little more. Jmo.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 May, 2009 03:09 am
@Elmud,
Elmud wrote:
Things simply cost more than they're worth Xris. The worth, or value of something is determined by how much it cost to produce it. New homes, cost more than they're worth. New automoblies cost more than they're worth. Groceries cost more than they're worth. Clothing cost more than its worth. A bag of chips cost more than they're worth. A soda pop cost more than it is worth. Everything costs more than its worth. But, we have to have these things. We all are slaves to profit. Sad thing is, it is such a shortsighted way of doing business. If a person could take a little less, they would actually get a little more. Jmo.
I appreciate that but why should the same drugs cost three times more in America than Europe.It can only be government influence or lack of it.You can live without your car ,glass of beer or fancy furniture but not medical care.Our doctors are one of the highest paid professionals but any member of public can have free medical care through the national health system.I hope Obama manages to do the same for a America,judging by the extreme right wing views displayed here i have my doubts.I'm amazed how the far right opinions are in America.In the UK ide be classified as normal, on this forum i appear to be a left wing nutter.
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 May, 2009 02:50 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
I appreciate that but why should the same drugs cost three times more in America than Europe.It can only be government influence or lack of it.You can live without your car ,glass of beer or fancy furniture but not medical care.Our doctors are one of the highest paid professionals but any member of public can have free medical care through the national health system.I hope Obama manages to do the same for a America,judging by the extreme right wing views displayed here i have my doubts.I'm amazed how the far right opinions are in America.In the UK ide be classified as normal, on this forum i appear to be a left wing nutter.
Don't know Xris. Hopefully someone smarter than I will figure things out.
0 Replies
 
Khethil
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 May, 2009 03:43 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
I appreciate that but why should the same drugs cost three times more in America than Europe.It can only be government influence or lack of it.You can live without your car ,glass of beer or fancy furniture but not medical care.Our doctors are one of the highest paid professionals but any member of public can have free medical care through the national health system.I hope Obama manages to do the same for a America,judging by the extreme right wing views displayed here i have my doubts.I'm amazed how the far right opinions are in America.In the UK ide be classified as normal, on this forum i appear to be a left wing nutter.


Here, here.

Resistance to nationalized health care is; well, unbelievable. Any reference to this (or anything else that can be equated to 'big government') invokes the most immediate and caustic reactions. I know the sentiment - and share it to some extent - but to describe it to someone outside is very difficult to put into words. As far as nationalized healthcare goes, my take is this: Of all the functions of the government we enact, I can't think of one more WORTHY of our support than Us taking care of Our People's Health. But on this case, I too have been labeled a blood-sucking liberal and told to shut up.

Profit; reasonable profit. In some ways this almost sounds like an oxymoron given the disdain so many of us have against profiteers. It's been called both "The Entrepreneurial Spirit!" as often as "Scum-Sucking Pigdom!". We're divided on this account (as I'd suppose many nations are).

If we examine the question: What's reasonable profit? I still think the practice I replied to here is not only widely accepted, but proportionate to the value of the products/services furnished (as long as it's kept low - no higher than 30% I'd think). And yes; I too would LOVE to go back to barter if it were possible.

Thanks
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 May, 2009 04:58 pm
@Khethil,
Khethil wrote:
And yes; I too would LOVE to go back to barter if it were possible.

Thanks

Yeah. Bartering sounds like a good way to do things. But then, what would happen to the tax base? Well, its nice to dream.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What is a reasonable profit?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 03:51:07