@gabalus,
gabalus wrote:Fido
Of course I could take a language with lock, stock and barell but then I should stop my investigation. What I've understood from your question is that you don't know what scientific theory is. My question was targeted to the people working in a certain philosophical tradition, having some knowledge on the subject. The posts like yours miss the point. Probably you prefer different philosophical option them me, then we have nothing to talk about, unless you understand my question [the question which is full of asumption, which are obvious for me, the others who knew what I'm asking for].
I am not sure I know what anything is, but I am pretty sure I know what is going on... I have been reading an interesting book, but poking around in it, might be more accurate... It is called Critique of Scientific Reason by Kurt Hubner translated by Dixon and Dixon..And you may be right, that I do not understand wht scientific theory is, but I would say it is the theoretical formulation of a behavior that if tested mught be expressed as a law.. . My reply was by way of observation that things like language work when they work in spite of the fact that we do not know how they work... You don't have to be an auto mechanic to drive a car...Still it is nice if you know how to check the oil... I pick up books on syntax, and language, and rhetoric, and grammer....Can I say that I honestly understand them??? Not in the least... English is not native to any of my genetic stock..Like the Latin of which it may be 50% part, it is the language of conquerors...I know some French which gave me the insight that to have and to be help to conjugate all the verbs, so all of life might be reduce to what you are, or have...And now I am trying to learn Greek, but I know only how to recognize some words, and have a small list of cognates... I heard once, and it makes sense, that when we talk about talking it is called the second intention... What, then, is the first intention???