Is the theory of everything God?

Forums: Philosophy
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Einstein thought out his two great theories in his youth, namely: "his theory of relativity = e= mc (2) and his great general theory "while still in his youth"

Going beyond the great physicists of Sir Isaac Newton. Albert Einstein. He spent the last approx 30 years of his life in vain searching for one equation, one single force, from which all other forces and fundamental laws and energy of the universe emanated, he called it "the Grand Unified Field Force" or the "THEORY OF EVERYTHING" becoming fact

Einstein rejected quantum mechanics saying "god does not play dice with the universe". but he does play dice and he cheats

Another great /physicist/mathematic genius Richard Feynman of the The 20 century said, rightly, "no one understands quantum mechanics"

He was so right, if one claims that they fully understands quantum mechanics and superstring theory they are bending the truth

What was this unified field of forces from which all things in the universe emanated?

Thus TOE= God?

Maybe Einstein and other scientists did not know that the Theory of Everything could lead us to god or a better understanding of god. The god that science could accept

Maybe the universe is colossal thought of the ultimate alpha/omega mind of god?
__________________

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,138 • Replies: 23

No top replies

@Alan McDougall,

Theory of Everything would be closer to an equation/scientific theory explaining Being than God IMO, I could be wrong though.

0 Replies

@Alan McDougall,

Alan McDougall;137131 wrote:

Maybe the universe is colossal thought of the ultimate alpha/omega mind of god?
__________________

There you have it, Information Theory !

...You just have to take the mind out of it...as mind Causes thought through Thought, but "God" itself has no Cause...

"God" is "Thought" without Mind...aldo this "Thought" brings minds in it...

...minds emerge from "Thought" (LAW) but no "Thought" emerges from minds, if not through "Thought" itself ("God")...as minds apprehend "Though" (LAW) instead of truly Causing it...

"God" is LAW !
"God" is ORDER !
"God" is UNITY !
"God" is DEFINED !
"God" is ACCOMPLISHED !
"God" does n?t EVOLVE !
"God" does n?t THINK !
"God" is just,(one huge frozen)THOUGHT !

("God" and Being mean the same...)

1 Reply

@Alan McDougall,

Alan McDougall;137131 wrote:

What was this unified field of forces from which all things in the universe emanated?

Thus TOE= God?

Schmidhuber's version of Zuse's thesis moots what he facetiously calls The Great Programmer, I doubt that's what theists generally mean by god, though it would fill some of the prehistorical roles attributed to some gods: Theory of Everything - Digital Physics

0 Replies

@Alan McDougall,

There is no use trying to reach God, if there is one - and I'm not saying there is or isn't - through thinking about it. Doesn't work, just produces confusion and more talk.

The fact that nobody can work out how the universe works is actually not a bad thing. If we had it all worked out, there would be nothing left to discover. This would be awful. There is still plenty of room left for the imagination.

0 Replies

@Alan McDougall,

The theory of everything will not solve or give answers to any of the problems that plaque us on the forum: god, values, aesthetics, knowledge, truth, determinism, mind, etc.
3 of the 4 fundamental physical forces already have a combined theory. The TOE will just combine gravity-space-time with the other three (probably a quantum and indeterministic theory) and you will not even notice the difference when it comes to philosophical problems.

2 Replies

@prothero,

prothero;137211 wrote:

The theory of everything will not solve or give answers to any of the problems that plaque us on the forum: god, values, aesthetics, knowledge, truth, determinism, mind, etc.
3 of the 4 fundamental physical forces already have a combined theory. The TOE will just combine gravity-space-time with the other three (probably a quantum and indeterministic theory) and you will not even notice the difference when it comes to philosophical problems.

I completely agree. Science be praised but there's a blind spot at its center. To speak metaphorically, it's that same place where the optic nerve connects to the retina.

1 Reply

@Reconstructo,

Reconstructo;137312 wrote:

I completely agree. Science be praised but there's a blind spot at its center. To speak metaphorically, it's that same place where the optic nerve connects to the retina.

Maybe the Big Bang NO??

0 Replies

@prothero,

prothero;137211 wrote:

The theory of everything will not solve or give answers to any of the problems that plaque us on the forum: god, values, aesthetics, knowledge, truth, determinism, mind, etc.
3 of the 4 fundamental physical forces already have a combined theory. The TOE will just combine gravity-space-time with the other three (probably a quantum and indeterministic theory) and you will not even notice the difference when it comes to philosophical problems.

Mankind's knowledge is like an onion that we keep trying to peel away the layers. Humanity is a mere few thousand generations from coming down from the trees. Our "knowledge" is still very very primitive. We still don't know what keeps our butts tied down to the ground.
Is there an intelligent deity? of course we don't know for sure but in the absence of facts otherwise, I find it difficult to understand how any of the know and unknown just Universe(s) came about.

0 Replies

@Alan McDougall,

Einstein said a lot of fancy stuff, Iirc the general relativity theory was the thing which he spend 30 years trying to prove, which he failed doing.

1 Reply

@HexHammer,

HexHammer;159521 wrote:

Einstein said a lot of fancy stuff, Iirc the general relativity theory was the thing which he spend 30 years trying to prove, which he failed doing.

You are wrong his general theory was proved it was the Theory of Everything that eluded him for many years. He was searching TOE the Theory of Everything

0 Replies

@Alan McDougall,

Alan McDougall;137131 wrote:

Maybe the universe is colossal thought of the ultimate alpha/omega mind of god?

Personally, I like this concept a lot and I think it's a great post.

GOD - a force of conscious energy - is the creator of the universe and in-turn the reason for Big Bang to occur. The Big Bang was possible by a spark of thought, from GOD. Science exists because in GOD's stream of thought there is such things such as the laws of physics which can be observed in the physical world. Theories suggesting that parallel universes exist are due to other sparks of thought set-off, by GOD. Each spark and stream of thought has no time frame, although they exist infinitely and simultaneously, and at the same time can have never existed.

I can't suggest any literature or evidence to support my opinion because I'm looking for theories which support such ideas myself. It's still a work in progress for all the sciences.

Meditate on this, I will.

0 Replies

@Alan McDougall,

Yea, I like the concept too. I also like the concept that maybe I am God. Unfortunately, liking a concept doesn't make it any more true than false, so one would need to come up with a good argument here.

Also, Einstein didn't reject QM; much of his work lead to Schrodinger's Equation and other discoveries in modern physics. He just didn't "like" the concept...but he couldn't deny the fact that it worked.

1 Reply

@Pangloss,

Pangloss;159809 wrote:

Yea, I like the concept too. I also like the concept that maybe I am God. Unfortunately, liking a concept doesn't make it any more true than false, so one would need to come up with a good argument here.

Also, Einstein didn't reject QM; much of his work lead to Schrodinger's Equation and other discoveries in modern physics. He just didn't "like" the concept...but he couldn't deny the fact that it worked.

Your right, liking a concept doesn't make it any more true than false. How can you make an valid argument for a theory that can't be proven or disproved? Physics observes and measures only one perspective of a particular reality within the physical world. I like the concept that GOD is a creator of the universe, in such manner as I described, as it relates to my self-study including some personal experiences I've experienced recently. I'm not denying any falseness to such ideas and I'm not advocating truth behind it either.

Einstein believed that a GOD existed. As a physicist he had other forms of perception to observe GOD. The perception in conventional physics won't define answers about GOD. The fundamental rules, laws, boundaries and perspectives that exist in the world of that science obscure many other variables that can not be observed using physics, in the physical world today.

0 Replies

@Fil Albuquerque,

Fil. Albuquerque;137138 wrote:

There you have it, Information Theory !

...You just have to take the mind out of it...as mind Causes thought through Thought, but "God" itself has no Cause...

"God" is "Thought" without Mind...aldo this "Thought" brings minds in it...

...minds emerge from "Thought" (LAW) but no "Thought" emerges from minds, if not through "Thought" itself ("God")...as minds apprehend "Though" (LAW) instead of truly Causing it...

"God" is LAW !
"God" is ORDER !
"God" is UNITY !
"God" is DEFINED !
"God" is ACCOMPLISHED !
"God" does n?t EVOLVE !
"God" does n?t THINK !
"God" is just,(one huge frozen)THOUGHT !

("God" and Being mean the same...)

thx this means that every god worshiped on this planet is wrong.
or better said he maths used by the worshipers is wrong.

0 Replies

@Alan McDougall,

Alan McDougall;137131 wrote:

Einstein thought out his two great theories in his youth, namely: "his theory of relativity = e= mc (2) and his great general theory "while still in his youth"

Going beyond the great physicists of Sir Isaac Newton. Albert Einstein. He spent the last approx 30 years of his life in vain searching for one equation, one single force, from which all other forces and fundamental laws and energy of the universe emanated, he called it "the Grand Unified Field Force" or the "THEORY OF EVERYTHING" becoming fact

Einstein rejected quantum mechanics saying "god does not play dice with the universe". but he does play dice and he cheats

Another great /physicist/mathematic genius Richard Feynman of the The 20 century
said, rightly, "no one understands quantum mechanics"

He was so right, if one claims that they fully understands quantum mechanics and superstring theory they are bending the truth

What was this unified field of forces from which all things in the universe emanated?

Thus TOE= God?

Maybe Einstein and other scientists did not know that the Theory of Everything could lead us to god or a better understanding of god. The god that science could accept

Maybe the universe is colossal thought of the ultimate alpha/omega mind of god?
__________________

The theory of everything eh? Where all knowledge and all things first existed. I don't think it would be a theory is all existence and knowledge originated from it, it would just be truth. Then what Einstein was really looking for is the truth. It makes since that where wall knowledge came from would be from the truth and all other truths and lies came after. Then God is the truth since all existence and knowledge came from him.

1 Reply

@JPhil,

JPhil;160122 wrote:

The theory of everything eh? Where all knowledge and all things first existed. I don't think it would be a theory is all existence and knowledge originated from it, it would just be truth. Then what Einstein was really looking for is the truth. It makes since that where wall knowledge came from would be from the truth and all other truths and lies came after. Then God is the truth since all existence and knowledge came from him.

The only way to do that is by using open logic...

1 Reply

@longfun,

longfun;160230 wrote:

The only way to do that is by using open logic...

Hmm. what do you mean?

1 Reply

@JPhil,

JPhil;160439 wrote:

Hmm. what do you mean?

free or open logic is the logic behind for example
Empty set - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and
Open set - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
it Keeps all doors open, and the result is truly relative to the observer, change the observer and you change the outcome.
I mean if we find a theory of everything it will be a theory very usable in observed range, but only imaginary usefull in the unobserved range.
And the fun thing is that it will function outside our real.
ps. if a god exists it must be an empty set.

1 Reply

@longfun,

longfun;160581 wrote:

free or open logic is the logic behind for example
Empty set - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and
Open set - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
it Keeps all doors open, and the result is truly relative to the observer, change the observer and you change the outcome.
I mean if we find a theory of everything it will be a theory very usable in observed range, but only imaginary usefull in the unobserved range.
And the fun thing is that it will function outside our real.
ps. if a god exists it must be an empty set.

What do you mean by the god is the empty set?

1 Reply

Is the theory of everything God?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know