Why is there only something?

The problem with this question is that 'nothing' is in itself 'something'. If the sock drawer is empty, then inside it is nothing. Nothing has become something, because it is describing what IS in the drawer. This is either a fault in our logic or our language, but as it stands we can't really get around this question.

Nothing is not an empty space, it is the total absence of space, time energy forces energy when everything is removed then the indescribably lack of all existence happens

Absolute nothingness is a negation to which no word exist , how do you describe a state of non being?

That's what I was saying the problem is. Even an absence is a thing. And if there's something then there's not nothing. If we've got something or nothing then we've got (A v ~A), but even if we have ~A, that's still something. We can only have the 'or' operation with two things, necessarily qualifying 'nothing' as something if we look at it this way.