@Alan McDougall,
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:Hi I dont need to go to any human source to find out if reincarnation is true or not. The Divine Christ Jesus said it was not true and that is good enough for me
"IT IS APPOINTED ONCE TO DIE AND THEN THE JUDGEMENT"
There are so many things wrong with reincarnation that I feel it's one of the more puzzling beliefs out there.
I find this response puzzling since you say that jesus statement is good enough yet you continue to ask questions? Wouldn't that mean that his statement is not good enough for you?
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
1) First of all, to accept reincarnation, you have to accept dualism. After all, it is the soul that survives and merely changes bodies when the current host dies. ?
No, you do not need to accept dualism at all. In fact enlightenment is the absence of dual mind. There is nothing that survives, no soul, nothing eternal. Nirvana is a "blowing out" like the extinguished candle flame. The burning desire for existence is extinguished, no further lives will come. ONLY if you still reside within the mind of ignorance will you seek birth.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
2) Living creatures, reincarnation claims that a new baby that doesn't have the same biological materials, don't have any of the same memories, doesn't have any sort of viable link to an old lady recently deceased from a heart attack, is indeed that old lady. It's patently absurd.
Every moment, every thought, every second, you change and are not the same being you were that second ago. It is an illusion to think you are the same being. Your body tells you this fact. Your body is constantly renewing cells. So why call it the same body? Because we are attached to name and form.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
But let's assume that the soul does exist and inhabits a new body when the old one dies.
This is a wrong view or assumption.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
3) Why does the soul forget its past experiences? What would make the soul's memories stop when the old body dies?
Memories are contained within the brain. The only way that you can recall past lives is to have gone beyond. Where the past present and future are all the same.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
4) Why would the self - the soul - not be able to remember? Is the soul not the ultimate self? Why would a new body limit the self's ability to conjure its own memories?
Because there is no soul, that is why you do not recall your past lives.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
No, this has been tested. It is a receptor that fires twice while absorbing the impulse from the sense data giving the impression that you experience the same experience twice, but its only an echo like effect.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
5) I ask what is the mechanism is for memories to be blocked or let through?. If they are blocked, how are they getting through? Why can't they all get through?
The only thing that could get through would be karmic.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
6) And if your old memories are lost forever, then what is the point of being reincarnated?
There is no point, it happens because the desire for existence is strong. It is that desire that causes rebirth to happen.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
7) The point of reincarnation is to extend life, but if you can't retain memories or lessons or knowledge from those past lives, how exactly have you extended your life?
You haven't. Your actions are what result in shortening or lengthening of life.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
8) It's not much better than saying you achieve immortality by living on in the hearts and minds of your friends.
For most it seems better to have this than anything else. I never even have found a single christian that accepts their loved ones have ended up in hell. They all write it off and say they all have gone to heaven. Have you ever seen a priest at a funeral say that the person in the grave has gone to hell? No not once. Not even if they were a serial killer have you ever seen them say such a thing.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
9) I want to live forever by living forever. I don't want some memory or trace of me living on.
My question is why? The longer you live the more devalued life becomes. If we all lived for ever the value you place on things would drastically change. You would take people for granted. You would take everything you love in this finite life and take a big crap on it.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
10) Where were all the souls before the earth existed?
There is no such thing as a soul. In other words there is nothing that exists eternally that carries with it some individuality or personality.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
11) Where will they go when the earth is destroyed?
They have never come, nor will they ever go anywhere.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
12) Will they continue to exist and be sentient, to interact in soul-land?
nope.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
13) Then why come into bodies at all??? the spiritual body is much superior why leave it for bleak flesh and blood
Desire for existence.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
14) And then what if the ratio of bodies-to-souls is off, say more souls than bodies?
There is a body when there is desire for existence. No soul required.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
15) Do the souls just hang out in soul-land waiting for a new body to inhabit?
Nope.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
16) Or what if there are more bodies than souls? Are new souls born?
Nope.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
17) Or are there some people who are just automatons - functioning robots without souls at all? Could we tell the automatons apart from the real people?
Soulless yes. Automatons no.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
18) Now let's deal with animals, if you accept trans-special reincarnation. Clearly some animals have different sorts of mental functioning abilities.
Subject to the results of karma.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
19) We can reason better, rats can discern smells better, bats can hear well. Different animals can see in different colors, very much a mental process of the mind.
I would say more of functioning brain to organ. Just like blind humans don't see as well as humans who have sight. Test their hearing I bet it's different too.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
20) How does the soul make up for these things?
It doesn't because it would have to have faculties to. In other words if it existed it would be nothing different than your current body/mind. Meaning it would die.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
21) When we get transferred to a chicken, do we lose our ability to reason?
Yep.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
22) When we are transferred out of a wolf, do we lose the knowledge of how to hunt?
Do wolves know how to hunt? You relearn the skills of survival from your next parents.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
23) Are our souls restricted in what they can express on their host? And then of course, what's the cutoff point of creatures imbued with souls?
I don't understand the question. Do animals have the same capability to be reborn as humans? Yes.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
24) Do rats have souls? Bees? Roaches? Bacteria? Viruses? Replicating proteins like Mad Cow?
Nope, not even you have one.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
25) Even if you restrict reincarnation to just humans; at what point in the human evolutionary chain was the first soul imbued?
There was no thought behind it.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
26) How do we explain Hitler heck what karma was he working off???
He just had a lack of empathy for a certain group of people. Many leaders have a lack of empathy for people, it's why they make decisions that get many people killed.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
27) Now how about the idea that the creature you get to inhabit depends on how good you were in your past life. Who keeps track? Who is the great record-keeper that sends you to your new body? What criteria are used? Is it objective, could it be objective? Does it make mistakes? How does it force our souls into the hosts? Could the soul refuse? And you have to wonder; is your fate graded on a curve?
There is no record keeper, there is nothing keeping track. It is simply mind. Depending on your state of desire and clinging to existence at the time of death will determine how you are reborn if at all.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
28) What if everyone in one generation acts perfectly and kindly and loving to everyone?
You probably wouldn't want to leave it.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
29) Surely the less desirable bodies are still being born and need to be inhabited.
Need to be?
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
30)) Would a couple of hugs be the difference between a hawk and a slug?
I don't think slugs like hugs.
Alan McDougall;101207 wrote:
Etc , etc , etc adinfinitum adinfinitum
Some of your questions are considered by me to be null since you have to transcend the concept of an eternal essence or soul. The Buddha strongly refuted such a thing existing. He said if such a thing did exist you would never have an opportunity to transcend life and death. The fact that we have no soul allows us the chance to.
If you don't believe me. Pick up a copy of
what the buddha taught.