Remote viewing does it happen

The basic concept you are hitting on is paranormal, and usually science (at least) does not go into that area too much--perhaps mostly the skeptics do. I, for one, would at least like to see paranormal ideas and assertions tested better--control groups, blind and double blind tests, etc.

I have heard of the idea of our having lost some extra sense (having such sensory perception ability lying dormant--the author of The Mustard Seed had pushed such an idea--but I am not convinced of any worthy accuracy of that yet. The limbic system can very well be seen as much of the older brain, and it does rely heavily on pure sensory caused emotion--but what sensory input would bring information beyond the basic 5? How can that notion be tested? I'm not sure it can be . . .

Dowsers are used to find water but blind testing has proved on more than one occasion that just guessing can be just as successful.I would love for it to be proved but no one has succeeded so far.
The tests that have given positive results have been discounted by others because they believe the tester was influencing the results.
The American navy spent millions on experiments but eventually gave up on it.Sorry to be negative Alan..Xris

No problem xris this type of thing does not lend itself to careful observation, and statistical method.

Physicists and science have observed a type of quantum connectivity between all fundamental particles in the universe, called non- locality and interconnectedness. This is a scientific proved reality, they have observed for instance, that if one electron, shoots off an atom in an anti- clock direction, its counter part a billion light years apart somehow instantly becomes aware of this and shoots of its atom in a clockwise direction.

By extrapolation of course

This instantaneous communication seems to defy Einstein law that nothing can exceed the speed of light, including communication

This method is what science will do to create and design the quantum , it will process data at almost infinite speed. There are statements in the chambers of scientific thought that the quantum computer will be able to solve an equation, in ONE HOUR that would take all the computing power of the world a "50 billion" years to do, longer than the age of the universe mind boggling

I could give some links, but I dont think Justin likes us using links. check it out for yourself google quantum computer

This is solid science, not spooky esoteric rubbish. Science thinks this interconnectivity might explain much of the so called spiritual phenomenon scientifically and I agree with them

The basic concept you are hitting on is paranormal, and usually science (at least) does not go into that area too much--perhaps mostly the skeptics do. I, for one, would at least like to see paranormal ideas and assertions tested better--control groups, blind and double blind tests, etc.

I have heard of the idea of our having lost some extra sense (having such sensory perception ability lying dormant--the author of The Mustard Seed had pushed such an idea--but I am not convinced of any worthy accuracy of that yet. The limbic system can very well be seen as much of the older brain, and it does rely heavily on pure sensory caused emotion--but what sensory input would bring information beyond the basic 5? How can that notion be tested? I'm not sure it can be . . .

The ideas are fantastic the reality is a not so clear or so easily proven.Many make claims but few survive the examination......

The basic concept you are hitting on is paranormal, and usually science (at least) does not go into that area too much--perhaps mostly the skeptics do. I, for one, would at least like to see paranormal ideas and assertions tested better--control groups, blind and double blind tests, etc.

In addition to remote viewing the effectiveness of remote healing via group prayer has been evaluated via controlled experiments. Group prayer when non specific* has been found to be effective. This is well documented.

The prayer is NOT aimed at a specific disease but is for a general healing.

KaseiJin wrote:

The basic concept you are hitting on is paranormal, and usually science (at least) does not go into that area too much--perhaps mostly the skeptics do. I, for one, would at least like to see paranormal ideas and assertions tested better--control groups, blind and double blind tests, etc.

In addition to remote viewing the effectiveness of remote healing via group prayer has been evaluated via controlled experiments. Group prayer when non specific* has been found to be effective. This is well documented.

The prayer is NOT aimed at a specific disease but is for a general healing.

Like I previously stated, the paranormal as you call it does not lend its self the scientific empirical testing. Somehow the closer you monitor an experiment the less accurate it becomes

Strangly the more you try and stain to remote you the less accurate it becomes, the less you know about your target the better and more accurate the result. The less you try the better the result, sort of gain not strain , if you get my drift

Last night all I did was lay down , relax quietly in the dark and waited for a vision to appear on my eye lids.I call this eye lid visions and I am sure most people have had them at some time or the other.

I know the visions are not really on the eye lids but there is an illusion that your brain is projecting images directly onto your closed eyes.

I have experienced these eye lid vision in such detail that they appear much more vivid than a TV screen

---------- Post added at 02:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:16 PM ----------

xris wrote:

Another link to a book Alan "The swing of the wild pendulum" i think thats its name.Amazing book well worth reading.QM is all over it.One of those books that can change your concept on almost everything..

Hi xris I will try and get the book "Swing of the Pendulum" thank you for the suggestion , I will try the local library first

I believe the book you are looking for is called "Stalking the Wild Pendulum" by Itzak Benton. Another interesting book in similar vein is 'Nothing in this book is True" Both make interesting readng

---------- Post added at 02:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:16 PM ----------



Hi xris I will try and get the book "Swing of the Pendulum" thank you for the suggestion , I will try the local library first

I have experimented on another forum with remarkable results.

Can the theory, experimental design and results be presented here for discussion?

Yes I would like that and would also like members brave enough on this thread to give RV a bash to prove or disprove it between ourselves

The basic concept you are hitting on is paranormal, and usually science (at least) does not go into that area too much--perhaps mostly the skeptics do. I, for one, would at least like to see paranormal ideas and assertions tested better--control groups, blind and double blind tests, etc.

I have heard of the idea of our having lost some extra sense (having such sensory perception ability lying dormant--the author of The Mustard Seed had pushed such an idea--but I am not convinced of any worthy accuracy of that yet. The limbic system can very well be seen as much of the older brain, and it does rely heavily on pure sensory caused emotion--but what sensory input would bring information beyond the basic 5? How can that notion be tested? I'm not sure it can be . . .