Your examples are quotes from people that clearly only considered 0,1..1,0..logic possibilities, concluding that 0 and 1 were the same (This was their ASSUMPTION)………. they clearly never considered 0,0..1,1 logic possibilities concluding that 0 and 1 were different (ALTERNATIVE ASSUMPTION).
In sound philosophy, it is not about knowing what the difference is if 0,1 are different it is only about the possibility that they are different.
If there is an overall united theory that covers all sciences then, in my opinion, it is reasonable to assume that similar principles would be at play across the sciences and therefore it would be reasonable to look elsewhere to obtain an answer to the question of whether there is a difference between 0 and 1.
Now we know that with magnetism there are 4 off logic output combination possibilities -/-;-/+;+/-;+/+ as previously mentioned and we know that magnetism plays a part in the overall make up of the cosmos/nature……and we know that all 4 off + and - force combinations are not the same because if they were then all 4 off magnetic force combinations would give the same output and they don’t.
You require a + and - force on both sides of scientific equations in order to balance things out.
In other words, nature has divided + and - forces…..they are not the same.
Therefore whilst deliberating things, I believe it is wise to consider this and unwise to ignore it.