Axis Austin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Mar, 2009 01:45 pm
@Axis Austin,
Caner: I enjoyed your last post so no worries. As for God changing, I personally think that the time he spent with Moses in the desert shows him changing his mind multiple times. First he says he'll destroy the Israelites for their wicked ways, but then Moses placates him by telling how mighty he is to have taken them out from the Pharaoh's grasp and he doesn't destroy them. That's my personal conviction, but there are other examples as well.

Cyber: My question is how does/did God interact with creation if he sees all time at once. Are those interactions temporal? How could they not be?
Cyber Abyss
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Mar, 2009 05:19 pm
@Axis Austin,
How could you not touch anyone when you see pure objective time?

I dont think we can fathom how God does what he does.

Your looking to examine a specific power of God to show how illogical that ability is in the real world but God's power is infinite.
Axis Austin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Mar, 2009 10:13 pm
@Cyber Abyss,
Cyber Abyss wrote:
How could you not touch anyone when you see pure objective time?

I dont think we can fathom how God does what he does.

Your looking to examine a specific power of God to show how illogical that ability is in the real world but God's power is infinite.


Perhaps we can't fathom it, but we should certainly try. I personally am not content to just say we can't know God and leave it at that. I want to know him more than just about anything.

And no, I'm not trying to show that God's ability to interact with the world is illogical. I sincerely do think he interacts, but I think he does so temporally, not timelessly.
0 Replies
 
Resha Caner
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Mar, 2009 06:26 pm
@Axis Austin,
Axis Austin wrote:
Caner: I enjoyed your last post so no worries. As for God changing, I personally think that the time he spent with Moses in the desert shows him changing his mind multiple times. First he says he'll destroy the Israelites for their wicked ways, but then Moses placates him by telling how mighty he is to have taken them out from the Pharaoh's grasp and he doesn't destroy them. That's my personal conviction, but there are other examples as well.


Oh, but that's an easy one to explain (place emoticon thingy here). You've left out the tough ones - the toughest of all being Jesus himself.

One spin on "change" is that he doesn't change his "omni" characteristics. So, for example, he demands perfect justice and always will. Yet he loves us perfectly and always will. Whether Jesus' breakfast changed the chemical content of his stomach was not intended by the statement that God does not change.

So, you tell me. Is that a fair interpretation or not?
0 Replies
 
Axis Austin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Mar, 2009 02:08 pm
@Axis Austin,
Caner - Maybe he doesn't change his "omni" characteristics, or his essence doesn't change. But there could still be legitimate change, perhaps, more than just the chemical content of Jesus' stomach.

Perhaps he changes is mind, like I've mentioned about his interactions with Moses and the Israelites. But anyway...

If God is timeless, as you seem to advocate, how does he interact with creation? Can you be specific?

And what about time?
Resha Caner
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Mar, 2009 06:50 am
@Axis Austin,
Axis Austin wrote:
Perhaps he changes is mind, like I've mentioned about his interactions with Moses and the Israelites.


I don't think he did change his mind. As I said, he loves us, and he demands justice. Those two characteristics of God appear to be brought into conflict because of human will. But, what God says is that if Israel continues on its current course, justice demands they be punished. Then Moses acts as an intercessor (Hmm, a parallel to ...). God accepts the offering of the intercessor, and Israel is spared - for a time. Eternal redemption requires a perfect offering to meet the demand for justice.

Axis Austin wrote:
If God is timeless, as you seem to advocate, how does he interact with creation? Can you be specific?


I suggested the earlier analogy as a passive means of interaction - and agreed it's not completely satisfactory. At the other end is a physical incarnation (Jesus) so that God is "in time" to interact with us personally. In the middle are the angels. They are spiritual, and therefore "know" God with respect to the mission for which they were created - in a sense, they carry with them a piece of that "passive" (for lack of a better description) interaction. Angels then have the ability to enter time and interact with us. If you notice, God usually speaks through a prophet or angel, not directly. There are a few instances that seem to imply God is speaking directly, but maybe it is simply that the angel is not mentioned.

Axis Austin wrote:
And what about time?


I'm not sure what you're asking.
click here
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Mar, 2009 04:20 am
@Resha Caner,
Resha Caner wrote:

It relates through the single biggest flaw in my idea. Another problem that parallels questions of time is the idea of "something from nothing". How did God give the universe a beginning? It wasn't, and then it was. If there was nothing, where did the something come from? I have a friend who is much stronger in Hebrew than I, and he interprets the first verses of Genesis to mean the universe was literally created from "nothing" - an absolute nothing. Space was not here. Time was not here. Even nothing was not here. Maybe he's right.


I am in no way a Hebrew expert but I am curious to see how your friend translates the verse to "out of nothing". I did a bit of searching myself and it seems that people ascribe "out of nothing" as that is what makes sense. I do not know the accuracy of this though I did read that in the ancient language there is no word for "created out of nothing" so the term that is used must then be assumed to be 'out of nothing'. The question then becomes whether or not that is a proper assumption.

Also in the original Hebrew text you will find the word used for 'created' in 46 verses of the Bible. Quite obviously many of them do not refer to 'out of nothing' which would seem to strengthen the possibility that that is only an inference. In fact many times it is used in these verses it does not even use the word "create" in the English translations.

[INDENT]Gen. 1:1, 21, 27; 2:3, 4; 5:1, 2; 6:7; Exo. 34:10; Num. 16:30; Deu. 4:32; Jos. 17:15, 18; 1Sa. 2:29; Psa. 51:10; 89:12, 47; 102:18; 104:30; 148:5; Ecc. 12:1; Isa. 4:5; 40:26, 28; 41:20; 42:5; 43:1, 7, 15; 45:7, 8, 12, 18; 48:7; 54:16; 57:19; 65:17, 18; Jer. 31:22; Eze. 21:19, 30; 23:47; 28:13, 15; Amos 4:13; Mal. 2:10;

[/INDENT]
Axis Austin wrote:

Perhaps he changes is mind, like I've mentioned about his interactions with Moses and the Israelites. But anyway...


If we agree that God is all knowing then we would know that God knew that Moses was going to try and convince God to not kill his people. You would also know that God knows what we will be studying in the Bible thousands of years later.

Is it not possible that God did what he did so as to show another aspect of Moses as well as other things?

Not to mention he didn't break his covenant so there is no change their for sure.
0 Replies
 
hammersklavier
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Mar, 2009 09:13 am
@Axis Austin,
Axis Austin wrote:

I have a question about your claim that anything metaphysical, including God, is outside of time. What if God changes? You seem to think, based on your arguments though you don't actually say this, that God doesn't change. Suppose he does. Would he experience time, if change/time are necessarily wrapped up?

If God does not change, you argue that he can still interact. I have a little trouble buying into/understanding this. Yes, if God were timeless he could still do one unchanging act and only through that can the universe exist, perhaps. But how can he do different acts: speaking to Moses in the burning bush and later speaking to his son Jesus? Is he doing both of these, and every number of acts, all together, and we simply feel the affects at different times?

While I think that's a workable theory, for me personally it doesn't adequately portray God's immanence to humanity. I feel that to be truly present, he needs to actually interact (at different times) with us, not just act.

As for the time issue, I'd love to hear your thoughts on it. While I have a bit to discuss about God and time, I have little to discuss about time, but am deeply intrigued by it.

The Christian idea of God is that He is a separate being who created the Universe. If that is true, He cannot exist within the Universe and still claim infinitude (because, of course, any definable unit of space must be bounded, and therefore finite--with the largest degree of finitude and the smallest degree of infinitude both being aleph-null, IIRC). To claim infinitude, it seems to me, God must be more infinite than the Universe is, and therefore exist outside our universe. I cannot make any claim about the nature of Time where God dwells, but since time is a measurement of change, and change is a necessarily requirement of conscious existence, then God must have a time (tempo of change) of some sort, just not our time, and that insofar as we can perceive Him, we cannot even begin to conceive the workings of His existence, so, as far as our Universe is concerned, God exists and acts outside it, that is to say, outside time.

However, Axis, I have major problems with this theory of God, namely, that (1) if God exists in His own universe, who's to say there aren't any other beings with God's qualities running about in said universe (actually, it seems to me there must be), and if there are, how can he claim He is the only God without being deliberately deceptive (and therefore not all-good)?...and (2) if God exists in His own universe, how did that universe come about? For these reasons, I believe there cannot be any distinction between God and the Universe, that is to say, that although I have a Christian background, I have a decidedly non-Christian theology.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » God and Time
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 06:19:39