0
   

Another interesting event

 
 
xris
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Mar, 2010 03:32 pm
@HexHammer,
HexHammer;141668 wrote:
People with dementia have been reported to have moments of clarity. Dementia usually only eats up short term memory, whilst long term memory are less affected.

My own theory is that short term memory isn't 100% gone, but can have maybe ~0.5% left, and can thereby have sporadic functionality.
Im not doubting anything that may be said, only the principle that personal experience can not be dismissed with such ease. It requires us to acknowledge they have a profound effect. I have heard several well meaning normal intelligent individuals tell of their experience, I might classify as dubious in normal circumstances. I only say this because I have had experiences that have led me to adjust my reasoning. I would not ever expect them to influence others, only for them to acknowledge the effect.
0 Replies
 
Pyrrho
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Mar, 2010 09:55 pm
@xris,
xris;141662 wrote:
So where did I say it proves an after life?



I did not say that you did. The question is, why did you relate the story? And why are you upset that I stated that the story proves nothing? If it was not intended by you to prove anything, what is wrong with saying it proves nothing?


xris;141662 wrote:
You presume too much. You would wish me to make that claim, in reality, to satisfy your egotistic intentions.



Nonsense. I wish for you to be reasonable, and therefore I wish you to assert no such foolish thing.


xris;141662 wrote:
You want to ignore my reasons and make your own irrelevant reply.



Reasons for what? You have not really given any reason for telling the story.


xris;141662 wrote:
You want to dismiss it without interrogation, simply on the principle that it reminds you of other reports.



I did not dismiss the story. I have no problems with the idea that the story is true. So what? The story does not prove anything regarding religion, or the philosophy of religion. So why did you post it here?


xris;141662 wrote:
I tried to present it as a reasonable reason for the personal experience to be considered as life changing for those who experience them ,not your dismissal of the experience.



Why would it change anyone's life? In what way is the story supposed to change anyone's life? That a dying person with dementia says something about an afterlife is not exactly a surprising story.


xris;141662 wrote:
Try understanding that those who have them believe them and understand from a philosophical manner their reasoning.



You have not providing any philosophical reasoning of any kind. You have merely told a story. A story is not a philosophical argument. A story may be used as an example, or it may contain philosophical arguments, as with Plato's writings, but a story is not in itself a philosophical argument.


xris;141662 wrote:
Lets say I present a story that withstands all interrogation and no logical explaination remains....Now you are still entitled to have your disbelief but surely your able to debate how it can have an enormous influence on those who have them.



We are not dealing with anything that defies logical or rational explanation. We are dealing with the words of a dying person with dementia. Such a person might say anything. There is no great mystery to be explained in such a story.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Mar, 2010 09:53 am
@Pyrrho,
I think I have to give up with your intentions. Dont you understand the point of its telling was the effect on people not the truth of it. It is not proving anything nor am I trying to, do you understand that much? It is the truth for them or for me with my experiences. You can apply your logic as much as you like, its not relevant. Experiences go beyond reasonable logic , its for those who experience them. My only interest is telling you that its enough for those who are close to the event. Till you have for yourself an unexplained experience , you will not understand another interesting event. I dont believe the vast majority of others experiences but no one can disprove mine. What I do understand is others attitudes when they believe theirs..get it?
0 Replies
 
Jebediah
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Mar, 2010 10:57 am
@xris,
But xris, if you frame the thread like that, then what is there to say? People do have experiences that affect them profoundly. Beyond that, I think we can reasonably discuss why it affected them, and what alternative explanations we could have.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Mar, 2010 01:40 pm
@Jebediah,
Jebediah;141915 wrote:
But xris, if you frame the thread like that, then what is there to say? People do have experiences that affect them profoundly. Beyond that, I think we can reasonably discuss why it affected them, and what alternative explanations we could have.
You might think thats all, but cant you see further than that? We are made of experiences and it has a profound effect on humanity. Its easy do dismiss them and be logical but the experience can not always be described sufficiently by those who experience them.

Take one of mine, now Im not asking you believe it. I believe I dreamt the lottery numbers but was not convinced sufficiently at the time, I had..Now its not important that you believe me but the result of that dream changed my view of life completely. I know I had a dream of a future event , you cant change my mind. If you believed it, what would it do for you?
0 Replies
 
Jebediah
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Mar, 2010 02:05 pm
@xris,
Well, I once briefly believed I had a ghost in my house. It was quite interesting. After thinking it over I realized what had caused me to believe that. Should I have not thought it over? Some people have dreams that involve sleep paralysis etc, which create a very powerful perception of being haunted. Does the fact that the experience is powerful mean that they should accept it as truth?

I'm not dismissing them you know. I love ghost stories; I don't reject them because they interfere with some treasured scientific beliefs I have. But I have reasons for not believing in them, despite powerful experiences. Don't you think logic and reasoning can be powerful too?
xris
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Mar, 2010 02:23 pm
@Jebediah,
Jebediah;141956 wrote:
Well, I once briefly believed I had a ghost in my house. It was quite interesting. After thinking it over I realized what had caused me to believe that. Should I have not thought it over? Some people have dreams that involve sleep paralysis etc, which create a very powerful perception of being haunted. Does the fact that the experience is powerful mean that they should accept it as truth?

I'm not dismissing them you know. I love ghost stories; I don't reject them because they interfere with some treasured scientific beliefs I have. But I have reasons for not believing in them, despite powerful experiences. Don't you think logic and reasoning can be powerful too?
The difference is you dont believe you met a ghost and I know I had sleep paralysis nightmare. If you believed you had met a ghost , no matter how much logic you applied to the experience, it would still make a profound difference to your beliefs. You cant put logic into a profound experience no matter what others say or do. I penned four numbers out of six and wrote a 6 when a 9 was drawn. This is after waking up and searching for pen and paper. Now I know others wont believe me and logic tells me a million people may dream the lottery numbers every night but only a few by chance get them right. BUT that dream was almost a real experience to me...I say again you dont have to believe me but cant you see the reason why it had an affect on me.
Pyrrho
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Mar, 2010 08:10 am
@xris,
xris;141963 wrote:
The difference is you dont believe you met a ghost and I know I had sleep paralysis nightmare. If you believed you had met a ghost , no matter how much logic you applied to the experience, it would still make a profound difference to your beliefs. You cant put logic into a profound experience no matter what others say or do. I penned four numbers out of six and wrote a 6 when a 9 was drawn. This is after waking up and searching for pen and paper. Now I know others wont believe me and logic tells me a million people may dream the lottery numbers every night but only a few by chance get them right. BUT that dream was almost a real experience to me...I say again you dont have to believe me but cant you see the reason why it had an affect on me.



Your story of the lottery numbers reminded me of something else. There is a brilliant episode of the old Alfred Hitchcock Presents show entitled "Mail Order Prophet" (Season 3, Episode 2). In it, a guy receives a letter from some stranger claiming the ability to predict the future, like the outcome of elections and sporting events. For full effect, I recommend watching the episode:

IMDb Video: The Mail Order Prophet




****SPOILERS****

Do not continue reading if you want to watch the episode, as things are revealed below that will spoil some surprises.



The letter suggests that the guy bet on the outcome. And the prediction in the letter turns out to be right. And then he gets another letter, with another prediction. It, too, turns out to be right. The letters continue. And so the guy makes bets, and gets rich, as the predictions all turn out to be right.

The thing is, there is a logical explanation of it at the end of the show, even though most people will never guess how there could be. And yet there is one. Of course, such things have a strong psychological effect on people. But that is because many people do not think logically and rationally about things, and jump to conclusions simply because they do not know the answer or have any good evidence regarding how something happened.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Mar, 2010 12:05 pm
@Pyrrho,
Pyrrho;142178 wrote:
Your story of the lottery numbers reminded me of something else. There is a brilliant episode of the old Alfred Hitchcock Presents show entitled "Mail Order Prophet" (Season 3, Episode 2). In it, a guy receives a letter from some stranger claiming the ability to predict the future, like the outcome of elections and sporting events. For full effect, I recommend watching the episode:

IMDb Video: The Mail Order Prophet




****SPOILERS****

Do not continue reading if you want to watch the episode, as things are revealed below that will spoil some surprises.



The letter suggests that the guy bet on the outcome. And the prediction in the letter turns out to be right. And then he gets another letter, with another prediction. It, too, turns out to be right. The letters continue. And so the guy makes bets, and gets rich, as the predictions all turn out to be right.

The thing is, there is a logical explanation of it at the end of the show, even though most people will never guess how there could be. And yet there is one. Of course, such things have a strong psychological effect on people. But that is because many people do not think logically and rationally about things, and jump to conclusions simply because they do not know the answer or have any good evidence regarding how something happened.
Im sorry but you will have to explain the fictional story as its not available outside the US.
Night Ripper
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Mar, 2010 12:09 pm
@xris,
xris;140678 wrote:
My daughter in laws grandmother died last week. She was 96 and had suffered with dementia for the last six years, not even recognising her daughter for the last six months. The day before she died, she suddenly recognised her daughter again and told her daughter with great excitement and joy that she had just seen her mother and father who had told her not to worry, everything was going to be OK.

I know all the obvious answers but I cant help thinking another odd event that gets me wondering, yet again.


Yay! We will all live forever in a golden mansion with all our relatives. Well, that will be awkward for some people that remarried after their first spouse died. Which one do you live with in Heaven?
0 Replies
 
Jebediah
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Mar, 2010 12:32 pm
@xris,
xris;142226 wrote:
Im sorry but you will have to explain the fictional story as its not available outside the US.


I'm pretty sure it's based on reality. The explanation is that someone started off by sending out 2,000 letters, with 1,000 predicting outcome A and 1,000 predicting outcome B. Then the next week he does the same thing, but only sends letters to the people he sent correct predictions too. In this way, after a number of weeks there is still 1 person who has received a huge string of correct predictions.

Generally this was a scam, and they would start charging money for future tips. I think this is a good argument for not stopping at the "gets me wondering" stage. Yes, these experiences are interesting and they have a profound effect on people. But why wouldn't they want to examine them more closely? The truth can be just as interesting as an illusion.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Mar, 2010 01:10 pm
@Jebediah,
Jebediah;142233 wrote:
I'm pretty sure it's based on reality. The explanation is that someone started off by sending out 2,000 letters, with 1,000 predicting outcome A and 1,000 predicting outcome B. Then the next week he does the same thing, but only sends letters to the people he sent correct predictions too. In this way, after a number of weeks there is still 1 person who has received a huge string of correct predictions.

Generally this was a scam, and they would start charging money for future tips. I think this is a good argument for not stopping at the "gets me wondering" stage. Yes, these experiences are interesting and they have a profound effect on people. But why wouldn't they want to examine them more closely? The truth can be just as interesting as an illusion.
Thanks for that but I'm a bit bewildered on who actually sent me the dream. I wonder would you bet a pound or dollar on a dream about seeing the winner of a horse race? You have to be a darned determined skeptic to turn down that opportunity.

I can assure you I examined mine very closely, do you think something of this magnitude would be treated lightly? I never ever believed that the future was written, it gave me many sleepless nights pondering on its significance. BUT as I say, knowing my reaction to others experiences, I can appreciate your feelings about mine. I will say it again many logical reasonable individuals are experiencing certain events they feel they have reason to believe and find them life changing. The shame of it is I did not treat it seriously or I would be sunning myself on a tropical beach now...
Pyrrho
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Mar, 2010 01:33 pm
@xris,
xris;142245 wrote:
Thanks for that but I'm a bit bewildered on who actually sent me the dream. I wonder would you bet a pound or dollar on a dream about seeing the winner of a horse race? You have to be a darned determined skeptic to turn down that opportunity.

I can assure you I examined mine very closely, do you think something of this magnitude would be treated lightly? I never ever believed that the future was written, it gave me many sleepless nights pondering on its significance. BUT as I say, knowing my reaction to others experiences, I can appreciate your feelings about mine. I will say it again many logical reasonable individuals are experiencing certain events they feel they have reason to believe and find them life changing. The shame of it is I did not treat it seriously or I would be sunning myself on a tropical beach now...


Jebediah explained it basically correctly.

I did not mean that this example is the same as your dreams, which is why I prefaced it with saying that it "reminded me of something else" and did not say that it reminded me of something very like it. I am sorry if I was not clear enough on that point.

It is not, however, totally irrelevant, since it is an example of something having a very significant emotional effect on someone, regardless of what the true facts are, of which the person is unaware.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Mar, 2010 01:51 pm
@Pyrrho,
Pyrrho;142251 wrote:
Jebediah explained it basically correctly.

I did not mean that this example is the same as your dreams, which is why I prefaced it with saying that it "reminded me of something else" and did not say that it reminded me of something very like it. I am sorry if I was not clear enough on that point.

It is not, however, totally irrelevant, since it is an example of something having a very significant emotional effect on someone, regardless of what the true facts are, of which the person is unaware.
I did not take offence but just assume im not lying and I retold the story correctly, what would you conclude from it logically.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 10:54:27