@xris,
hi xris
i think the key thing is whether we are fighting for freedom of spiritual practice. At Avebury there is a kind of fight for our rights, but no bloodshed yet. Stonehenge is more of a problem. Its a tricky one because these sites are seen now as 'world heritage', whatever that means, and should thus be 'protected'. It isn't dogma though. Its beaurocracy.
As pagans we recognise nature to be enchanted .... the beaurocracy sees nothing in that light. It is a difficult thing to take on because it is couched in the likes of freedom of access, conservation, health and safety, historical artefact and entrance fees. Such concepts and practice are diffuse. They are regulatory yet for the benefit of all. The exact opposite of dogma ...... cold grey non commitment to any passionate belief.
When we practice ritual we reveal what is possible. If the people watching see quaint and charming video shots that add to the enjoyment of their day out then we cannot exert change and recognition. Ironically it is the occassional anger of annoyed locals that gives us something to work on. A platform to speak directly. That and when the likes of english heritage or the national trust and other land owners call in the police to get us removed.
Nature like everything else is beaurocracised. Ownership, access, tv nature programmes, preservation and so on. The machine and the language that it speaks. Cold and organised.
Its just that many other religions sit much more easily with beaurocracy because they themselves are highly organised and their beliefs are written down in holy texts that are central to their spiritual practice. God and allahs order and word.
...... pagans do not need texts or organised institution to express their enchanted vision and feeling for this realm. Nor do they need those things to protect paganism itself either. Spontaneity and being in nature is enough to recreate our spiritual path.